Does a selection of contractors in a public tender constitute an infringement of a prohibition of competition restricting agreements? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 April 2007 – STALEXPORT – TRANSROUTE (Ref. No. III SK 3/07)

Does a selection of contractors in a public tender constitute an infringement of a prohibition of competition restricting agreements? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 April 2007 – STALEXPORT – TRANSROUTE (Ref. No. III SK 3/07)

The judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 April 2007 (Ref. No. III SK 3/07) must be supported. Assessed was primarily the relationship between Polish legislation concerning toll motorways and road traffic and the former Act of 15 December 2000 on competition and consumer protection (hereafter, Competi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Rafał Poździk
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	University of Warsaw 2008-11-01
Series:	Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Online Access:	https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2008_1_1/R-Pozdzik.pdf

Similar Items

What does an obligation to purchase “green energy” mean? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 5 July 2007 – Green energy (Ref. No. III SK 13/07)
by: Filip Elżanowski
Published: (2008-11-01)

Does an undertaking’s reputation affect its market power on the relevant market? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 2 April 2009 – PPKS (Ref. No. III SK 30/08)
by: Rafał Stankiewicz
Published: (2010-11-01)

Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)
by: Anna Piszcz
Published: (2010-11-01)

Prohibition of cockfighting. Case note on the judgment 163/2018 of National Supreme Court of Justice (Mexico)
by: Brenda Yesenia Olalde Vázquez
Published: (2019-01-01)

Wide scope of administrative discretion justified by features of telecommunications market. Case comment to the judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 2 April 2009 – Telekomunikacja Polska SA v the President of the Electronic Communications Office (Ref. No. III SK 28/08)
by: Małgorzata Kozak
Published: (2010-11-01)

Contractor's mistakes during tendering
by: Adnan, H, et al.
Published: (2018)

Contractor's mistakes during tendering
by: Adnan, H., et al.
Published: (2018)

The control of Polish courts over the infringements of procedural rules by the national competition authority. Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 August 2009 – Marquard Media Polska (Ref. No. III SK 5/09)
by: Maciej Bernatt
Published: (2010-11-01)

What is the link between Article 6 Section 3a of the Energy Law Act and Article 490 of the Civil Code regarding the right of a grid operator to suspend the supply of electricity? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court Judgment of 5 June 2007 – GZE (Ref No. III SK 11/07)
by: Michał Będkowski-Kozioł
Published: (2008-11-01)

A courier service as a postal universal service – can a court asses the correctness of a legal qualification of a service of a courier company that was not contested by the company in an earlier decision taken by the postal regulator? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 April 2007 – Courier services (Ref. No. III SK 2/07)
by: Agata Jurkowska
Published: (2008-11-01)

Freedom of competition or environmental safety – what should a municipality prioritize?Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 3 March 2010 – Katowice Commune(Ref. No. III SK 37/09)
by: Bartosz Targański
Published: (2011-11-01)

A Study on Inducing Infringement of Indirect Patent Infringement, Mainly Focusing on The Judgment of The Infringing Intention of Infringer
by: Chang Jin Li, et al.
Published: (2015)

Coordinated information retrieval for building contractors' tendering
by: Betts, M. P.
Published: (1987)

Contractors' bidding behaviour and tender price prediction
by: McCaffer, Ronald
Published: (1976)

CRITICAL GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 29 AUGUST 2019 (FILE REF. NO. I OSK 657/19)
by: Stanisław Bułajewski
Published: (2020-07-01)

Critical gloss to the judgment of the SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT of 18 November 2020 (file ref. No. I OSK 1927/18)
by: Marcin Adamczyk
Published: (2021-07-01)

When will the imposition of the requirement to co-finance the construction of necessary facilities constitute an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 5 January 2007 – Kolej Gondolowa (Ref. No. III SK 17/06)
by: Konrad Kohutek
Published: (2008-11-01)

Study on judgment of patent validity and infringement in Taiwan
by: Shun-hsin Wu, et al.
Published: (2013)

Tender Conspiracy Under KPPU Decision and Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Act
by: Udin Silalahi, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

A Departure from a Formalistic Approach in the Assessment of Restrictive Vertical Agreements in Favour of a More EconomicsBased Approach? Case Comment to the Supreme Court Judgment of 15 May 2014 (Ref. No. III SK 44/13)
by: Małgorzata Sieradzka
Published: (2015-08-01)

The Future of Broadcast Television: Online Streaming Infringement and the U.S. Supreme Court
by: Cuttner, Elizabeth
Published: (2014)

Judicial Review of Contractor Selecting Decisions of Government Procurement Agency — Focus on Tendering Specifications and Qualifications of Tenderers
by: SHIH,HSIN-YU, et al.
Published: (2019)

The combination of DEA and AHP approach in the selection of contractors participating in tenders
by: A. Hoseinpoor, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Lack of a Price Reduction Despite a Decrease in Service Quality as an Unfair Price and Abuse of a Dominant Position. Case Comment to the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 13 July 2012, Autostrada Malopolska (Ref. No. III SK 44/11)
by: Elżbieta Krajewska
Published: (2013-11-01)

Due Process Rights in Polish Antitrust Proceedings. Case comment to the Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 3 October 2013 – PKP Cargo S.A. v. President of the Office of Competition and Consumers Protection (Ref. No. III SK 67/12)
by: Dariusz Aziewicz
Published: (2015-08-01)

The legal status of an undertaking – should local governments be treated more favourably in relation to the penalties for breaching Polish antitrust law? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 5 January 2007 – City Ostrołęka (Ref. No. III SK 16/06)
by: Maciej Bernatt
Published: (2008-11-01)

Which authority is competent to decide when a power company is abusing monopolistic power: the President of the UOKiK or the President of the URE?Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of April 2, 2009 – ENION S.A.(Ref. No III SK 36/08).
by: Aleksander Maziarz
Published: (2011-08-01)

How contractors take account of risk in the tender process : theory and practice
by: Laryea, Samuel
Published: (2008)

Judgment-Rationale Inconsistency In The U.S. Supreme Court
by: Hitt, Matthew P.
Published: (2014)

The Study on Cross Strait Patent Infringement Judgment of Civil Suit
by: Chiu, Chih Chu, et al.
Published: (2011)

Models of Contractor Selection and Bid Price Evaluation for Most Advantageous Tendering Method
by: Lin, Chun-Chang, et al.
Published: (2008)

Collaboration between project owners and contractors during the tender process in the construction industry
by: Karlsson, Andreas, et al.
Published: (2018)

THE SUPREME COUNCIL of BESSARABIA BETWEEN AUGUST 1816 – APRIL 1818
by: Alexei AGACHI
Published: (2018-04-01)

Automatic Extraction of Gist of Chinese Judgments of the Supreme Court
by: Chen, Kuan-Chun, et al.
Published: (2018)

Intersection between the activities of two regulators – shall prior actions taken by the National Telecoms Regulator exclude the ability to intervene by the Competition Authority?Case comments to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 17 March 2010 –Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. (Ref. No. III SK 41/09)
by: Szymon Syp
Published: (2011-11-01)

Jurisdiction and the Recognition • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Transnational Patents Infringement Disputes.
by: Tsai, Minying, et al.
Published: (2011)

The prohibition of wearing veil in public schools in Egypt: an analysis of the Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court jurisprudence
by: Mohamed A. Arafa
Published: (2017-02-01)

The very relevant market.Case comment to the judgment of the Court of Appeals in Warsaw of 22 April 2010 – Interchange fee(Ref. No. VI ACa 607/09)
by: Katarzyna Tosza
Published: (2011-11-01)

Evaluating the Impact of Risk on Contractor’s Tender Figure in Public Buildings Projects in Northern Nigeria
by: L. O. Oyewobi, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Contractor's perception of the use of statistical approach in the tender evaluation at the Public Works Department, Malaysia
by: Halil, F.M
Published: (2007)