The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods

<p>Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise is the most...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. C. Y. Lee, P. Stuart, A. Clifton, M. J. Fields, J. Perr-Sauer, L. Williams, L. Cameron, T. Geer, P. Housley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-02-01
Series:Wind Energy Science
Online Access:https://www.wind-energ-sci.net/5/199/2020/wes-5-199-2020.pdf
id doaj-4747fe6041e54e4d9b78e63101533338
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4747fe6041e54e4d9b78e631015333382020-11-25T03:34:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsWind Energy Science2366-74432366-74512020-02-01519922310.5194/wes-5-199-2020The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methodsJ. C. Y. Lee0P. Stuart1A. Clifton2M. J. Fields3J. Perr-Sauer4L. Williams5L. Cameron6T. Geer7P. Housley8National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USARenewable Energy Systems, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, England, UKStuttgart Wind Energy, Institute of Aircraft Design and Manufacture, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, GermanyNational Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USAComputational Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USAComputational Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USARenewable Energy Systems, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, England, UKDNV GL, Portland, Oregon 97204, USASSE plc, Glasgow, Scotland, UK<p>Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise is the most recent intelligence-sharing exercise of the Power Curve Working Group, which aims to advance the modeling of turbine performance. The goal of the exercise is to search for modeling methods that reduce error and uncertainty in power prediction when wind shear and turbulence digress from design conditions. Herein, we analyze data from 55 wind turbine power performance tests from nine contributing organizations with statistical tests to quantify the skills of the prediction-correction methods. We assess the accuracy and precision of four proposed trial methods against the baseline method, which uses the conventional definition of a power curve with wind speed and air density at hub height. The trial methods reduce power-production prediction errors compared to the baseline method at high wind speeds, which contribute heavily to power production; however, the trial methods fail to significantly reduce prediction uncertainty in most meteorological conditions. For the meteorological conditions when a wind turbine produces less than the power its reference power curve suggests, using power deviation matrices leads to more accurate power prediction. We also determine that for more than half of the submissions, the data set has a large influence on the effectiveness of a trial method. Overall, this work affirms the value of data-sharing efforts in advancing power curve modeling and establishes the groundwork for future collaborations.</p>https://www.wind-energ-sci.net/5/199/2020/wes-5-199-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. C. Y. Lee
P. Stuart
A. Clifton
M. J. Fields
J. Perr-Sauer
L. Williams
L. Cameron
T. Geer
P. Housley
spellingShingle J. C. Y. Lee
P. Stuart
A. Clifton
M. J. Fields
J. Perr-Sauer
L. Williams
L. Cameron
T. Geer
P. Housley
The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
Wind Energy Science
author_facet J. C. Y. Lee
P. Stuart
A. Clifton
M. J. Fields
J. Perr-Sauer
L. Williams
L. Cameron
T. Geer
P. Housley
author_sort J. C. Y. Lee
title The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
title_short The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
title_full The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
title_fullStr The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
title_full_unstemmed The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
title_sort power curve working group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Wind Energy Science
issn 2366-7443
2366-7451
publishDate 2020-02-01
description <p>Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise is the most recent intelligence-sharing exercise of the Power Curve Working Group, which aims to advance the modeling of turbine performance. The goal of the exercise is to search for modeling methods that reduce error and uncertainty in power prediction when wind shear and turbulence digress from design conditions. Herein, we analyze data from 55 wind turbine power performance tests from nine contributing organizations with statistical tests to quantify the skills of the prediction-correction methods. We assess the accuracy and precision of four proposed trial methods against the baseline method, which uses the conventional definition of a power curve with wind speed and air density at hub height. The trial methods reduce power-production prediction errors compared to the baseline method at high wind speeds, which contribute heavily to power production; however, the trial methods fail to significantly reduce prediction uncertainty in most meteorological conditions. For the meteorological conditions when a wind turbine produces less than the power its reference power curve suggests, using power deviation matrices leads to more accurate power prediction. We also determine that for more than half of the submissions, the data set has a large influence on the effectiveness of a trial method. Overall, this work affirms the value of data-sharing efforts in advancing power curve modeling and establishes the groundwork for future collaborations.</p>
url https://www.wind-energ-sci.net/5/199/2020/wes-5-199-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jcylee thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT pstuart thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT aclifton thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT mjfields thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT jperrsauer thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT lwilliams thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT lcameron thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT tgeer thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT phousley thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT jcylee powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT pstuart powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT aclifton powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT mjfields powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT jperrsauer powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT lwilliams powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT lcameron powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT tgeer powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
AT phousley powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods
_version_ 1724557368006541312