The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods
<p>Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise is the most...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Wind Energy Science |
Online Access: | https://www.wind-energ-sci.net/5/199/2020/wes-5-199-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-4747fe6041e54e4d9b78e63101533338 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4747fe6041e54e4d9b78e631015333382020-11-25T03:34:48ZengCopernicus PublicationsWind Energy Science2366-74432366-74512020-02-01519922310.5194/wes-5-199-2020The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methodsJ. C. Y. Lee0P. Stuart1A. Clifton2M. J. Fields3J. Perr-Sauer4L. Williams5L. Cameron6T. Geer7P. Housley8National Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USARenewable Energy Systems, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, England, UKStuttgart Wind Energy, Institute of Aircraft Design and Manufacture, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, GermanyNational Wind Technology Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USAComputational Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USAComputational Science Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USARenewable Energy Systems, Kings Langley, Hertfordshire, England, UKDNV GL, Portland, Oregon 97204, USASSE plc, Glasgow, Scotland, UK<p>Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise is the most recent intelligence-sharing exercise of the Power Curve Working Group, which aims to advance the modeling of turbine performance. The goal of the exercise is to search for modeling methods that reduce error and uncertainty in power prediction when wind shear and turbulence digress from design conditions. Herein, we analyze data from 55 wind turbine power performance tests from nine contributing organizations with statistical tests to quantify the skills of the prediction-correction methods. We assess the accuracy and precision of four proposed trial methods against the baseline method, which uses the conventional definition of a power curve with wind speed and air density at hub height. The trial methods reduce power-production prediction errors compared to the baseline method at high wind speeds, which contribute heavily to power production; however, the trial methods fail to significantly reduce prediction uncertainty in most meteorological conditions. For the meteorological conditions when a wind turbine produces less than the power its reference power curve suggests, using power deviation matrices leads to more accurate power prediction. We also determine that for more than half of the submissions, the data set has a large influence on the effectiveness of a trial method. Overall, this work affirms the value of data-sharing efforts in advancing power curve modeling and establishes the groundwork for future collaborations.</p>https://www.wind-energ-sci.net/5/199/2020/wes-5-199-2020.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. C. Y. Lee P. Stuart A. Clifton M. J. Fields J. Perr-Sauer L. Williams L. Cameron T. Geer P. Housley |
spellingShingle |
J. C. Y. Lee P. Stuart A. Clifton M. J. Fields J. Perr-Sauer L. Williams L. Cameron T. Geer P. Housley The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods Wind Energy Science |
author_facet |
J. C. Y. Lee P. Stuart A. Clifton M. J. Fields J. Perr-Sauer L. Williams L. Cameron T. Geer P. Housley |
author_sort |
J. C. Y. Lee |
title |
The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods |
title_short |
The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods |
title_full |
The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods |
title_fullStr |
The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods |
title_sort |
power curve working group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Wind Energy Science |
issn |
2366-7443 2366-7451 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
<p>Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference
power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting
turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range
of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise
is the most recent intelligence-sharing exercise of the Power Curve Working
Group, which aims to advance the modeling of turbine performance. The goal
of the exercise is to search for modeling methods that reduce error and
uncertainty in power prediction when wind shear and turbulence digress from
design conditions. Herein, we analyze data from 55 wind turbine power
performance tests from nine contributing organizations with statistical tests
to quantify the skills of the prediction-correction methods. We assess the
accuracy and precision of four proposed trial methods against the baseline
method, which uses the conventional definition of a power curve with wind
speed and air density at hub height. The trial methods reduce
power-production prediction errors compared to the baseline method at high
wind speeds, which contribute heavily to power production; however, the
trial methods fail to significantly reduce prediction uncertainty in most
meteorological conditions. For the meteorological conditions when a wind
turbine produces less than the power its reference power curve suggests,
using power deviation matrices leads to more accurate power prediction. We
also determine that for more than half of the submissions, the data set has a
large influence on the effectiveness of a trial method. Overall, this work
affirms the value of data-sharing efforts in advancing power curve modeling
and establishes the groundwork for future collaborations.</p> |
url |
https://www.wind-energ-sci.net/5/199/2020/wes-5-199-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jcylee thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT pstuart thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT aclifton thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT mjfields thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT jperrsauer thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT lwilliams thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT lcameron thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT tgeer thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT phousley thepowercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT jcylee powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT pstuart powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT aclifton powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT mjfields powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT jperrsauer powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT lwilliams powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT lcameron powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT tgeer powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods AT phousley powercurveworkinggroupsassessmentofwindturbinepowerperformancepredictionmethods |
_version_ |
1724557368006541312 |