Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados

From the experience of sharing a research agenda between the Centre for Public Policy Research at the University of São Paulo and the Institute of Local Government Studies at the University of Birmingham, this paper discusses the challenges that political scientists and public managers have to face...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Maria Assumpção-Rodrigues, José Veríssimo Romão Netto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Confins 2019-03-01
Series:Confins
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/confins/18995
id doaj-4745c91b26524bdf898859fcca83254a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4745c91b26524bdf898859fcca83254a2020-11-25T01:08:20ZengConfinsConfins1958-92122019-03-0110.4000/confins.18995Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situadosMarta Maria Assumpção-RodriguesJosé Veríssimo Romão NettoFrom the experience of sharing a research agenda between the Centre for Public Policy Research at the University of São Paulo and the Institute of Local Government Studies at the University of Birmingham, this paper discusses the challenges that political scientists and public managers have to face in order to standardize concepts such as quality of democracy, and institutional flexibility / incompleteness and / or rigidity. It argues not only that these concepts must be historically contextualized but, most importantly, that such contextualization must pay greater attention to the relationship between the quality of democracy and institutional designs. Otherwise, the comparative analysis will not be fruitful in bringing into light the differences (and similarities) that characterize the cases studied.http://journals.openedition.org/confins/18995quality of democracyinstitutional flexibilityincompletenessrigidity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marta Maria Assumpção-Rodrigues
José Veríssimo Romão Netto
spellingShingle Marta Maria Assumpção-Rodrigues
José Veríssimo Romão Netto
Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
Confins
quality of democracy
institutional flexibility
incompleteness
rigidity
author_facet Marta Maria Assumpção-Rodrigues
José Veríssimo Romão Netto
author_sort Marta Maria Assumpção-Rodrigues
title Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
title_short Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
title_full Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
title_fullStr Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
title_full_unstemmed Flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
title_sort flexibilidade institucional e qualidade da democracia:sobre a comparação de conceitos historicamente construídos e geograficamente situados
publisher Confins
series Confins
issn 1958-9212
publishDate 2019-03-01
description From the experience of sharing a research agenda between the Centre for Public Policy Research at the University of São Paulo and the Institute of Local Government Studies at the University of Birmingham, this paper discusses the challenges that political scientists and public managers have to face in order to standardize concepts such as quality of democracy, and institutional flexibility / incompleteness and / or rigidity. It argues not only that these concepts must be historically contextualized but, most importantly, that such contextualization must pay greater attention to the relationship between the quality of democracy and institutional designs. Otherwise, the comparative analysis will not be fruitful in bringing into light the differences (and similarities) that characterize the cases studied.
topic quality of democracy
institutional flexibility
incompleteness
rigidity
url http://journals.openedition.org/confins/18995
work_keys_str_mv AT martamariaassumpcaorodrigues flexibilidadeinstitucionalequalidadedademocraciasobreacomparacaodeconceitoshistoricamenteconstruidosegeograficamentesituados
AT joseverissimoromaonetto flexibilidadeinstitucionalequalidadedademocraciasobreacomparacaodeconceitoshistoricamenteconstruidosegeograficamentesituados
_version_ 1725183050029989888