NIETZSCHE AND HABERMAS IN THE TISSUE OF THE DIALECTICS OF ENLIGHTENMENT NIETZSCHE E HABERMAS NO TECIDO DA DIALÉTICA DO ESCLARECIMENTO

• Main Author: Barbara Lucchesi Ramacciotti
• Format: Article
• Language: deu
• Published: Universidade Federal de Goiás 2011-12-01
• Series: Philósophos : Revista de Filosofia
• Subjects: Esclarecimento; razão instrumental; vontade de verdade.
• Online Access: http://www.revistas.ufg.br/index.php/philosophos/article/view/15175

&lt;p&gt;In this article we will examine some connections between criticism of Adorno and Horkheimer to instrumental reason limited to the book Dialectic of Enlightenment and the genealogical critique of Nietzsche to the "will to truth ", a theme explored in several books. Then resume the reading of Habermas in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity on a Nietzsche’s radical critique to modern rationality, in order to examine two points: 1) What arguments support the thesis of inconsistency and lack of foundation of Nietzsche's genealogical critique? 2) why Habermas claims that the heirs of Nietzschean critique repeat this inconsistency, including the very critical of Adorno and Horkheimer? We intend to demonstrate, unlike Habermas, Adorno and Horkheimer in demythologization program of instrumental reason resume Nietzschean critical project aiming to build a new positive and demythologized meaning for enlightenment.&lt;/p&gt;<br>&lt;p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm; line-height: 150%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;Neste artigo examinaremos algumas conexões entre a crítica de Adorno e Horkheimer à razão instrumental circunscrita ao livro &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dialética do Esclarecimento&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt; e a crítica genealógica de Nietzsche à "vontade de verdade", tema explorado em vários livros&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;. &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;Em seguida retomaremos a leitura de Habermas em &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;O Discurso Filosófico da Modernidade &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;sobre a crítica radical nietzschiana à racionalidade moderna, com o objetivo de examinar dois pontos: 1) quais argumentos sustentam a tese da inconsistência e da falta de fundamento da crítica genealógica nietzschiana? 2) por que Habermas afirma que os herdeiros da crítica nietzschiana repetem essa inconsistência, incluindo a própria crítica de Adorno e Horkheimer? Pretendemos demonstrar, ao contrário de Habermas, que Adorno e Horkheimer no programa de desmitologização da razão instrumental retomam o projeto crítico nietzschiano com o objetivo&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;construir um novo sentido positivo e desmitificado para o esclarecimento. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;