Sequential Load Transport in Grass-Cutting Ants (Atta vollenweideri): Maximization of Plant Delivery Rate or Improved Information Transfer?
Sequential transport of plant fragments was studied in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Two competing hypotheses concerning its occurrence were tested. Based on the “economic-transport hypothesis," sequential transport occurs because of a mismatch between load size and ant body size,...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Psyche: A Journal of Entomology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/643127 |
Summary: | Sequential transport of plant fragments was studied in the grass-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri. Two competing hypotheses concerning its occurrence were tested. Based on the “economic-transport hypothesis," sequential transport occurs because of a mismatch between load size and ant body size, and it is therefore considered a way to improve size-matching and so the plant delivery rate. Alternatively, the “information-transfer hypothesis" states that sequential transport improves the information flow during foraging. By transferring its load, a worker may return earlier to the foraging site so as to intensify
chemical recruitment. To distinguish between these two competing hypotheses, standardized paper fragments that differed either in
size or in quality were presented to workers of a field colony, and sequential transport was quantified. Neither an increase in
fragment mass nor in fragment length influenced the occurrence of transport chains. Sequential transport took longer than transport
by a single carrier. However, the occurrence of sequential transport increased with increasing fragment quality. High-quality
fragments were transferred more frequently and after shorter distances than less-attractive fragments. Taken together, these
results strongly support the hypothesis that sequential load transport has been favoured during evolution because of an
improvement in the information flow during foraging. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-2615 1687-7438 |