Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this ‘indeterminate MINOCA’ diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. F. S. Pustjens, A. Meerman, N. P. A. Vranken, A. W. Ruiters, B. Gho, M. Stein, M. Ilhan, L. Veenstra, P. Winkler, Á. Lux, S. Rasoul, A. W. J. van ‘t Hof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02176-2
id doaj-470ecab5e4b24a9785ff64f1c58b5cbc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-470ecab5e4b24a9785ff64f1c58b5cbc2021-08-01T11:05:51ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612021-07-0121111110.1186/s12872-021-02176-2Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort studyT. F. S. Pustjens0A. Meerman1N. P. A. Vranken2A. W. Ruiters3B. Gho4M. Stein5M. Ilhan6L. Veenstra7P. Winkler8Á. Lux9S. Rasoul10A. W. J. van ‘t Hof11Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreDepartment of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical CentreAbstract Background Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this ‘indeterminate MINOCA’ diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardiovascular events and presentations to the Cardiac Emergency Department (CED). Methods We retrospectively analysed all patients meeting the diagnostic MINOCA criteria presenting at a large secondary hospital between January 2017 and April 2019. Participants Patients were divided into the (1) ‘indeterminate MINOCA’, or (2) ‘MINOCA with diagnosis’ group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and any revascularisation procedure. Secondary outcomes were all recurrent visits at the CED, and MACE including unplanned cardiac hospitalisation. Results In 62/198 (31.3%) MINOCA patients, a conclusive diagnosis was found (myocardial infarction, (peri)myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, or miscellaneous). MINOCA patients with a confirmed diagnosis were younger compared to those with an indeterminate diagnosis (56.7 vs. 62.3 years, p = 0.007), had higher maximum troponin-T [238 ng/L vs. 69 ng/L, p < 0.001] and creatine kinase (CK) levels [212U/L vs. 152U/L, p = 0.007], and presented more frequently with electrocardiographic signs of ischaemia (71.0% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.002). Indeterminate MINOCA patients more often showed recurrent CED presentations (36.8% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.048), however the occurrence of cardiovascular events was equal (8.8 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.86). Multivariable analysis showed that elevated levels of troponin-T and CK, ST-segment deviation on electrocardiography, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion abnormalities, and performance of additional examination methods were independent predictors for finding the underlying MINOCA cause. Conclusions Only in one-third of MINOCA patients a conclusive diagnosis for the acute presentation was identified. Recurrent CED visits were more often observed in the indeterminate MINOCA group, while the occurrence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups. Trial registration Retrospectively registeredhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02176-2MINOCAAcute coronary syndromeOutcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. F. S. Pustjens
A. Meerman
N. P. A. Vranken
A. W. Ruiters
B. Gho
M. Stein
M. Ilhan
L. Veenstra
P. Winkler
Á. Lux
S. Rasoul
A. W. J. van ‘t Hof
spellingShingle T. F. S. Pustjens
A. Meerman
N. P. A. Vranken
A. W. Ruiters
B. Gho
M. Stein
M. Ilhan
L. Veenstra
P. Winkler
Á. Lux
S. Rasoul
A. W. J. van ‘t Hof
Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
MINOCA
Acute coronary syndrome
Outcome
author_facet T. F. S. Pustjens
A. Meerman
N. P. A. Vranken
A. W. Ruiters
B. Gho
M. Stein
M. Ilhan
L. Veenstra
P. Winkler
Á. Lux
S. Rasoul
A. W. J. van ‘t Hof
author_sort T. F. S. Pustjens
title Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_short Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_full Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_sort importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (minoca): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this ‘indeterminate MINOCA’ diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardiovascular events and presentations to the Cardiac Emergency Department (CED). Methods We retrospectively analysed all patients meeting the diagnostic MINOCA criteria presenting at a large secondary hospital between January 2017 and April 2019. Participants Patients were divided into the (1) ‘indeterminate MINOCA’, or (2) ‘MINOCA with diagnosis’ group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and any revascularisation procedure. Secondary outcomes were all recurrent visits at the CED, and MACE including unplanned cardiac hospitalisation. Results In 62/198 (31.3%) MINOCA patients, a conclusive diagnosis was found (myocardial infarction, (peri)myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, or miscellaneous). MINOCA patients with a confirmed diagnosis were younger compared to those with an indeterminate diagnosis (56.7 vs. 62.3 years, p = 0.007), had higher maximum troponin-T [238 ng/L vs. 69 ng/L, p < 0.001] and creatine kinase (CK) levels [212U/L vs. 152U/L, p = 0.007], and presented more frequently with electrocardiographic signs of ischaemia (71.0% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.002). Indeterminate MINOCA patients more often showed recurrent CED presentations (36.8% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.048), however the occurrence of cardiovascular events was equal (8.8 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.86). Multivariable analysis showed that elevated levels of troponin-T and CK, ST-segment deviation on electrocardiography, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion abnormalities, and performance of additional examination methods were independent predictors for finding the underlying MINOCA cause. Conclusions Only in one-third of MINOCA patients a conclusive diagnosis for the acute presentation was identified. Recurrent CED visits were more often observed in the indeterminate MINOCA group, while the occurrence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups. Trial registration Retrospectively registered
topic MINOCA
Acute coronary syndrome
Outcome
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02176-2
work_keys_str_mv AT tfspustjens importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ameerman importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT npavranken importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT awruiters importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT bgho importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mstein importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT milhan importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lveenstra importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pwinkler importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alux importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT srasoul importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT awjvanthof importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1721246295617699840