‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research

Poor study reproducibility is a concern in translational research. As a solution, it is recommended to increase sample size (N), i.e., add more subjects to experiments. The goal of this study was to examine/visualize data multimodality (data with >1 data peak/mode) as cause of study irreproducibi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abigail R. Basson, Fabio Cominelli, Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Personalized Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/3/234
id doaj-46e9d09dcff04fb18494396be6d7b041
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46e9d09dcff04fb18494396be6d7b0412021-03-24T00:02:31ZengMDPI AGJournal of Personalized Medicine2075-44262021-03-011123423410.3390/jpm11030234‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal ResearchAbigail R. Basson0Fabio Cominelli1Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios2Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USADivision of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USAPoor study reproducibility is a concern in translational research. As a solution, it is recommended to increase sample size (N), i.e., add more subjects to experiments. The goal of this study was to examine/visualize data multimodality (data with >1 data peak/mode) as cause of study irreproducibility. To emulate the repetition of studies and random sampling of study subjects, we first used various simulation methods of random number generation based on preclinical published disease outcome data from human gut microbiota-transplantation rodent studies (e.g., intestinal inflammation and univariate/continuous). We first used unimodal distributions (one-mode, Gaussian, and binomial) to generate random numbers. We showed that increasing N does not reproducibly identify statistical differences when group comparisons are repeatedly simulated. We then used multimodal distributions (>1-modes and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods of random sampling) to simulate similar multimodal datasets A and B (<i>t</i>-test-<i>p</i> = 0.95; N = 100,000), and confirmed that increasing N does not improve the ‘reproducibility of statistical results or direction of the effects’. Data visualization with violin plots of categorical random data simulations with five-integer categories/five-groups illustrated how multimodality leads to irreproducibility. Re-analysis of data from a human clinical trial that used maltodextrin as dietary placebo illustrated multimodal responses between human groups, and after placebo consumption. In conclusion, increasing N does not necessarily ensure reproducible statistical findings across repeated simulations due to randomness and multimodality. Herein, we clarify how to quantify, visualize and address disease data multimodality in research. Data visualization could facilitate study designs focused on disease subtypes/modes to help understand person–person differences and personalized medicine.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/3/234violin plotsrandom samplinganalytical reproducibilitymicrobiomefecal matter transplantationdata disease subtypes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abigail R. Basson
Fabio Cominelli
Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios
spellingShingle Abigail R. Basson
Fabio Cominelli
Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios
‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
Journal of Personalized Medicine
violin plots
random sampling
analytical reproducibility
microbiome
fecal matter transplantation
data disease subtypes
author_facet Abigail R. Basson
Fabio Cominelli
Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios
author_sort Abigail R. Basson
title ‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
title_short ‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
title_full ‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
title_fullStr ‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
title_full_unstemmed ‘Statistical Irreproducibility’ Does Not Improve with Larger Sample Size: How to Quantify and Address Disease Data Multimodality in Human and Animal Research
title_sort ‘statistical irreproducibility’ does not improve with larger sample size: how to quantify and address disease data multimodality in human and animal research
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Personalized Medicine
issn 2075-4426
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Poor study reproducibility is a concern in translational research. As a solution, it is recommended to increase sample size (N), i.e., add more subjects to experiments. The goal of this study was to examine/visualize data multimodality (data with >1 data peak/mode) as cause of study irreproducibility. To emulate the repetition of studies and random sampling of study subjects, we first used various simulation methods of random number generation based on preclinical published disease outcome data from human gut microbiota-transplantation rodent studies (e.g., intestinal inflammation and univariate/continuous). We first used unimodal distributions (one-mode, Gaussian, and binomial) to generate random numbers. We showed that increasing N does not reproducibly identify statistical differences when group comparisons are repeatedly simulated. We then used multimodal distributions (>1-modes and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods of random sampling) to simulate similar multimodal datasets A and B (<i>t</i>-test-<i>p</i> = 0.95; N = 100,000), and confirmed that increasing N does not improve the ‘reproducibility of statistical results or direction of the effects’. Data visualization with violin plots of categorical random data simulations with five-integer categories/five-groups illustrated how multimodality leads to irreproducibility. Re-analysis of data from a human clinical trial that used maltodextrin as dietary placebo illustrated multimodal responses between human groups, and after placebo consumption. In conclusion, increasing N does not necessarily ensure reproducible statistical findings across repeated simulations due to randomness and multimodality. Herein, we clarify how to quantify, visualize and address disease data multimodality in research. Data visualization could facilitate study designs focused on disease subtypes/modes to help understand person–person differences and personalized medicine.
topic violin plots
random sampling
analytical reproducibility
microbiome
fecal matter transplantation
data disease subtypes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/3/234
work_keys_str_mv AT abigailrbasson statisticalirreproducibilitydoesnotimprovewithlargersamplesizehowtoquantifyandaddressdiseasedatamultimodalityinhumanandanimalresearch
AT fabiocominelli statisticalirreproducibilitydoesnotimprovewithlargersamplesizehowtoquantifyandaddressdiseasedatamultimodalityinhumanandanimalresearch
AT alexanderrodriguezpalacios statisticalirreproducibilitydoesnotimprovewithlargersamplesizehowtoquantifyandaddressdiseasedatamultimodalityinhumanandanimalresearch
_version_ 1724205471138578432