Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?

The ultimate goal of exploiting adult neurogenesis (AN) as a source of cell replacement is far from being achieved. In spite of many data gathered during the last two decades on homeostatic and reactive neurogenesis, it is evident that such knowledge is not sufficient for granting translational outc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo ePeretto, Luca eBonfanti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2014.00154/full
id doaj-46e5ad49d1e748c49cccdcf982c1209c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46e5ad49d1e748c49cccdcf982c1209c2020-11-24T22:51:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2014-06-01810.3389/fnins.2014.0015491994Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?Paolo ePeretto0Luca eBonfanti1University of TurinUniversity of TurinThe ultimate goal of exploiting adult neurogenesis (AN) as a source of cell replacement is far from being achieved. In spite of many data gathered during the last two decades on homeostatic and reactive neurogenesis, it is evident that such knowledge is not sufficient for granting translational outcomes. By asking the question whether AN research field has to be considered as a dead end in such a perspective, here we review some major unresolved issues: multifaceted evolutionary constraints emerged in mammals, stem/progenitor cell type/availability and tissue permissivity, the possible impact on other brain functions and/or interplay with other forms of plasticity, and relevance in humans. We suggest that full understanding of AN biological processes is an essential step to their possible exploitation for brain repair, and that further fundamental, multidisciplinary research is required before translational outcomes can be reached. Scientist's attitude and their communication skills are also important. To avoid overestimation of AN reparative potential, more distant goals of cell replacement should be kept clearly distinct from restorative approaches involving AN plasticity, both representing translational perspectives.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2014.00154/fullNeurodegenerative DiseasesRegenerative Medicinecell therapybrain evolutionbrain repairtherapeutic approaches
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paolo ePeretto
Luca eBonfanti
spellingShingle Paolo ePeretto
Luca eBonfanti
Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Regenerative Medicine
cell therapy
brain evolution
brain repair
therapeutic approaches
author_facet Paolo ePeretto
Luca eBonfanti
author_sort Paolo ePeretto
title Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
title_short Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
title_full Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
title_fullStr Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
title_full_unstemmed Major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
title_sort major unsolved points in adult neurogenesis: doors open on a translational future?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2014-06-01
description The ultimate goal of exploiting adult neurogenesis (AN) as a source of cell replacement is far from being achieved. In spite of many data gathered during the last two decades on homeostatic and reactive neurogenesis, it is evident that such knowledge is not sufficient for granting translational outcomes. By asking the question whether AN research field has to be considered as a dead end in such a perspective, here we review some major unresolved issues: multifaceted evolutionary constraints emerged in mammals, stem/progenitor cell type/availability and tissue permissivity, the possible impact on other brain functions and/or interplay with other forms of plasticity, and relevance in humans. We suggest that full understanding of AN biological processes is an essential step to their possible exploitation for brain repair, and that further fundamental, multidisciplinary research is required before translational outcomes can be reached. Scientist's attitude and their communication skills are also important. To avoid overestimation of AN reparative potential, more distant goals of cell replacement should be kept clearly distinct from restorative approaches involving AN plasticity, both representing translational perspectives.
topic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Regenerative Medicine
cell therapy
brain evolution
brain repair
therapeutic approaches
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2014.00154/full
work_keys_str_mv AT paoloeperetto majorunsolvedpointsinadultneurogenesisdoorsopenonatranslationalfuture
AT lucaebonfanti majorunsolvedpointsinadultneurogenesisdoorsopenonatranslationalfuture
_version_ 1725671015483179008