Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication, impacting short- and long-term patient outcomes. Although the application of the classification systems for AKI has improved diagnosis, early clinical recognition of AKI is still challenging, as increments in serum creatinine may be late and low ur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camila Lima, Etienne Macedo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Disease Markers
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4907024
id doaj-46e1d9ac9d264450a207ce51c3083a31
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46e1d9ac9d264450a207ce51c3083a312020-11-25T02:28:47ZengHindawi LimitedDisease Markers0278-02401875-86302018-01-01201810.1155/2018/49070244907024Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney InjuryCamila Lima0Etienne Macedo1Internal Medicine Department, Nephrology Division, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilInternal Medicine Department, Nephrology Division, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication, impacting short- and long-term patient outcomes. Although the application of the classification systems for AKI has improved diagnosis, early clinical recognition of AKI is still challenging, as increments in serum creatinine may be late and low urine output is not always present. The role of urinary biochemistry has remained unclear, especially in critically ill patients. Differentiating between a transient and persistent acute kidney injury is of great need in clinical practice, and despite studies questioning their application in clinical practice, biochemistry indices continue to be used while we wait for a novel early injury biomarker. An ideal marker would provide more detailed information about the type, intensity, and location of the injury. In this review, we will discuss factors affecting the fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) and fractional excretion of urea (FeU). We believe that the frequent assessment of urinary biochemistry and microscopy can be useful in evaluating the likelihood of AKI reversibility. The availability of early injury biomarkers could help guide clinical interventions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4907024
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camila Lima
Etienne Macedo
spellingShingle Camila Lima
Etienne Macedo
Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury
Disease Markers
author_facet Camila Lima
Etienne Macedo
author_sort Camila Lima
title Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury
title_short Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury
title_full Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury
title_fullStr Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury
title_full_unstemmed Urinary Biochemistry in the Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury
title_sort urinary biochemistry in the diagnosis of acute kidney injury
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Disease Markers
issn 0278-0240
1875-8630
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication, impacting short- and long-term patient outcomes. Although the application of the classification systems for AKI has improved diagnosis, early clinical recognition of AKI is still challenging, as increments in serum creatinine may be late and low urine output is not always present. The role of urinary biochemistry has remained unclear, especially in critically ill patients. Differentiating between a transient and persistent acute kidney injury is of great need in clinical practice, and despite studies questioning their application in clinical practice, biochemistry indices continue to be used while we wait for a novel early injury biomarker. An ideal marker would provide more detailed information about the type, intensity, and location of the injury. In this review, we will discuss factors affecting the fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) and fractional excretion of urea (FeU). We believe that the frequent assessment of urinary biochemistry and microscopy can be useful in evaluating the likelihood of AKI reversibility. The availability of early injury biomarkers could help guide clinical interventions.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4907024
work_keys_str_mv AT camilalima urinarybiochemistryinthediagnosisofacutekidneyinjury
AT etiennemacedo urinarybiochemistryinthediagnosisofacutekidneyinjury
_version_ 1724836428656934912