Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning

As part of a long-term program to develop effective, research-based professional development programs for physics graduate student teaching assistants (TAs), we first identify their current classroom practices and why they engage in these practices. In this paper, we identify a set of teaching pract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renee Michelle Goertzen, Rachel E. Scherr, Andrew Elby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2010-04-01
Series:Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.010105
id doaj-46d948ff491b40bea7967e2d0bc66002
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46d948ff491b40bea7967e2d0bc660022020-11-25T02:46:35ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research1554-91782010-04-0161Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learningRenee Michelle GoertzenRachel E. ScherrAndrew ElbyAs part of a long-term program to develop effective, research-based professional development programs for physics graduate student teaching assistants (TAs), we first identify their current classroom practices and why they engage in these practices. In this paper, we identify a set of teaching practices we call “focusing on indicators,” which occurs when TAs use signs such as key words or diagrams as evidence that students understand the target idea; these indicators are more superficial than a detailed explanation. Our primary finding is that although the three TAs discussed here share a common behavior, the beliefs and motivations that underlie this behavior vary. We argue that TA professional development focused on changing these TAs’ focus-on-indicator behavior is unlikely to be effective. Instead, responsive TA professional development will need to address the TAs’ beliefs that guide the observed classroom behavior.http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.010105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renee Michelle Goertzen
Rachel E. Scherr
Andrew Elby
spellingShingle Renee Michelle Goertzen
Rachel E. Scherr
Andrew Elby
Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
author_facet Renee Michelle Goertzen
Rachel E. Scherr
Andrew Elby
author_sort Renee Michelle Goertzen
title Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
title_short Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
title_full Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
title_fullStr Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
title_full_unstemmed Tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: Similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
title_sort tutorial teaching assistants in the classroom: similar teaching behaviors are supported by varied beliefs about teaching and learning
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research
issn 1554-9178
publishDate 2010-04-01
description As part of a long-term program to develop effective, research-based professional development programs for physics graduate student teaching assistants (TAs), we first identify their current classroom practices and why they engage in these practices. In this paper, we identify a set of teaching practices we call “focusing on indicators,” which occurs when TAs use signs such as key words or diagrams as evidence that students understand the target idea; these indicators are more superficial than a detailed explanation. Our primary finding is that although the three TAs discussed here share a common behavior, the beliefs and motivations that underlie this behavior vary. We argue that TA professional development focused on changing these TAs’ focus-on-indicator behavior is unlikely to be effective. Instead, responsive TA professional development will need to address the TAs’ beliefs that guide the observed classroom behavior.
url http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.010105
work_keys_str_mv AT reneemichellegoertzen tutorialteachingassistantsintheclassroomsimilarteachingbehaviorsaresupportedbyvariedbeliefsaboutteachingandlearning
AT rachelescherr tutorialteachingassistantsintheclassroomsimilarteachingbehaviorsaresupportedbyvariedbeliefsaboutteachingandlearning
AT andrewelby tutorialteachingassistantsintheclassroomsimilarteachingbehaviorsaresupportedbyvariedbeliefsaboutteachingandlearning
_version_ 1715392614449020928