The Relevance of History to Philosophy of Science
I argue for the possibility of historicized philosophy of science, and then respond to three criticisms of view: 1) history of science provides too few case examples to be useful to philosophy, 2) philosophy based on history is prone to reflexive inconsistency and 3) history of science exhibits an i...
Main Author: | Robert HUDSON |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of the Basque Country
2010-01-01
|
Series: | THEORIA : an International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ehu.es/ojs/index.php/THEORIA/article/view/538 |
Similar Items
-
What is the “reflexive historicizing of communication”? A philosophical approach
by: Wendland Michał
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Soldiering Archaeology: Pitt Rivers and ‘Militarism’
by: Christopher Evans
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Revelation in Nicolas Berdyaev’s Religious Philosophy
by: McKinlay Brian
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Can Philosophy of Science Inquire into History?
by: David Černín
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Pitts, Digging for Richard: How Archaeology Found the King (Thames & Hudson, 2014)
by: Andrew Pickering
Published: (2016-12-01)