Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting

This article draws on ethnographic data to explore lived experiences and narratives of mitigation unfolding in a toxic waste site in Endicott, New York, the birthplace of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and the location of a contentious U.S. EPA Superfund Site. It introduces the po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter C. Little
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Arizona Libraries 2013-12-01
Series:Journal of Political Ecology
Online Access:https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21765
id doaj-46d5f0fcc9194c959451f386fee910d7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46d5f0fcc9194c959451f386fee910d72020-11-24T22:15:43ZengUniversity of Arizona LibrariesJournal of Political Ecology1073-04512013-12-0120121723710.2458/v20i1.2176521158Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster settingPeter C. Little0University of Louisville, USAThis article draws on ethnographic data to explore lived experiences and narratives of mitigation unfolding in a toxic waste site in Endicott, New York, the birthplace of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and the location of a contentious U.S. EPA Superfund Site. It introduces the political ecology of mitigation concept and showcases how this critical approach to toxics repair can inform contemporary environmental social science discussions of environmental contamination and risk society. Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation, it is argued, calls for an ethnographic approach cognizant of politics of knowledge and expertise that invoke competing visions of mitigation in general and the efficacy of mitigation technologies and science in particular. Mitigation decisions are political and not simply scientific decisions. The political ecology of mitigation explored here pays close attention to the practices and processes through which toxics mitigation is wielded and negotiated. It shows how such practices and processes may inform contemporary perspectives on toxic neoliberal environments and ecologies. Key words: political ecology, toxics mitigation, IBM, neoliberalism, ethnographyhttps://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21765
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter C. Little
spellingShingle Peter C. Little
Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
Journal of Political Ecology
author_facet Peter C. Little
author_sort Peter C. Little
title Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
title_short Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
title_full Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
title_fullStr Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
title_full_unstemmed Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
title_sort envisioning the political ecology of mitigation in a microelectronic disaster setting
publisher University of Arizona Libraries
series Journal of Political Ecology
issn 1073-0451
publishDate 2013-12-01
description This article draws on ethnographic data to explore lived experiences and narratives of mitigation unfolding in a toxic waste site in Endicott, New York, the birthplace of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and the location of a contentious U.S. EPA Superfund Site. It introduces the political ecology of mitigation concept and showcases how this critical approach to toxics repair can inform contemporary environmental social science discussions of environmental contamination and risk society. Envisioning the political ecology of mitigation, it is argued, calls for an ethnographic approach cognizant of politics of knowledge and expertise that invoke competing visions of mitigation in general and the efficacy of mitigation technologies and science in particular. Mitigation decisions are political and not simply scientific decisions. The political ecology of mitigation explored here pays close attention to the practices and processes through which toxics mitigation is wielded and negotiated. It shows how such practices and processes may inform contemporary perspectives on toxic neoliberal environments and ecologies. Key words: political ecology, toxics mitigation, IBM, neoliberalism, ethnography
url https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/JPE/article/view/21765
work_keys_str_mv AT peterclittle envisioningthepoliticalecologyofmitigationinamicroelectronicdisastersetting
_version_ 1725793652944404480