Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
The benefit provided to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by an acoustic beamforming microphone array was determined in a speech-on-speech masking experiment. Normal-hearing controls were tested as well. For the SNHL listeners, prescription-determined gain was applied to the stimuli,...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Trends in Hearing |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515593385 |
id |
doaj-46b82bd63c1f476d837f65bcc2763539 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-46b82bd63c1f476d837f65bcc27635392020-11-25T04:10:41ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652015-06-011910.1177/233121651559338510.1177_2331216515593385Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party ProblemGerald KiddChristine R. MasonVirginia BestJayaganesh SwaminathanThe benefit provided to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by an acoustic beamforming microphone array was determined in a speech-on-speech masking experiment. Normal-hearing controls were tested as well. For the SNHL listeners, prescription-determined gain was applied to the stimuli, and performance using the beamformer was compared with that obtained using bilateral amplification. The listener identified speech from a target talker located straight ahead (0° azimuth) in the presence of four competing talkers that were either colocated with, or spatially separated from, the target. The stimuli were spatialized using measured impulse responses and presented via earphones. In the spatially separated masker conditions, the four maskers were arranged symmetrically around the target at ±15° and ±30° or at ±45° and ±90°. Results revealed that masked speech reception thresholds for spatially separated maskers were higher (poorer) on average for the SNHL than for the normal-hearing listeners. For most SNHL listeners in the wider masker separation condition, lower thresholds were obtained through the microphone array than through bilateral amplification. Large intersubject differences were found in both listener groups. The best masked speech reception thresholds overall were found for a hybrid condition that combined natural and beamforming listening in order to preserve localization for broadband sources.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515593385 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gerald Kidd Christine R. Mason Virginia Best Jayaganesh Swaminathan |
spellingShingle |
Gerald Kidd Christine R. Mason Virginia Best Jayaganesh Swaminathan Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem Trends in Hearing |
author_facet |
Gerald Kidd Christine R. Mason Virginia Best Jayaganesh Swaminathan |
author_sort |
Gerald Kidd |
title |
Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem |
title_short |
Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem |
title_full |
Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem |
title_fullStr |
Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem |
title_sort |
benefits of acoustic beamforming for solving the cocktail party problem |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Trends in Hearing |
issn |
2331-2165 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
The benefit provided to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by an acoustic beamforming microphone array was determined in a speech-on-speech masking experiment. Normal-hearing controls were tested as well. For the SNHL listeners, prescription-determined gain was applied to the stimuli, and performance using the beamformer was compared with that obtained using bilateral amplification. The listener identified speech from a target talker located straight ahead (0° azimuth) in the presence of four competing talkers that were either colocated with, or spatially separated from, the target. The stimuli were spatialized using measured impulse responses and presented via earphones. In the spatially separated masker conditions, the four maskers were arranged symmetrically around the target at ±15° and ±30° or at ±45° and ±90°. Results revealed that masked speech reception thresholds for spatially separated maskers were higher (poorer) on average for the SNHL than for the normal-hearing listeners. For most SNHL listeners in the wider masker separation condition, lower thresholds were obtained through the microphone array than through bilateral amplification. Large intersubject differences were found in both listener groups. The best masked speech reception thresholds overall were found for a hybrid condition that combined natural and beamforming listening in order to preserve localization for broadband sources. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515593385 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT geraldkidd benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem AT christinermason benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem AT virginiabest benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem AT jayaganeshswaminathan benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem |
_version_ |
1724419724944605184 |