Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem

The benefit provided to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by an acoustic beamforming microphone array was determined in a speech-on-speech masking experiment. Normal-hearing controls were tested as well. For the SNHL listeners, prescription-determined gain was applied to the stimuli,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerald Kidd, Christine R. Mason, Virginia Best, Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-06-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515593385
id doaj-46b82bd63c1f476d837f65bcc2763539
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46b82bd63c1f476d837f65bcc27635392020-11-25T04:10:41ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652015-06-011910.1177/233121651559338510.1177_2331216515593385Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party ProblemGerald KiddChristine R. MasonVirginia BestJayaganesh SwaminathanThe benefit provided to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by an acoustic beamforming microphone array was determined in a speech-on-speech masking experiment. Normal-hearing controls were tested as well. For the SNHL listeners, prescription-determined gain was applied to the stimuli, and performance using the beamformer was compared with that obtained using bilateral amplification. The listener identified speech from a target talker located straight ahead (0° azimuth) in the presence of four competing talkers that were either colocated with, or spatially separated from, the target. The stimuli were spatialized using measured impulse responses and presented via earphones. In the spatially separated masker conditions, the four maskers were arranged symmetrically around the target at ±15° and ±30° or at ±45° and ±90°. Results revealed that masked speech reception thresholds for spatially separated maskers were higher (poorer) on average for the SNHL than for the normal-hearing listeners. For most SNHL listeners in the wider masker separation condition, lower thresholds were obtained through the microphone array than through bilateral amplification. Large intersubject differences were found in both listener groups. The best masked speech reception thresholds overall were found for a hybrid condition that combined natural and beamforming listening in order to preserve localization for broadband sources.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515593385
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerald Kidd
Christine R. Mason
Virginia Best
Jayaganesh Swaminathan
spellingShingle Gerald Kidd
Christine R. Mason
Virginia Best
Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Gerald Kidd
Christine R. Mason
Virginia Best
Jayaganesh Swaminathan
author_sort Gerald Kidd
title Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
title_short Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
title_full Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
title_fullStr Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem
title_sort benefits of acoustic beamforming for solving the cocktail party problem
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2015-06-01
description The benefit provided to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) by an acoustic beamforming microphone array was determined in a speech-on-speech masking experiment. Normal-hearing controls were tested as well. For the SNHL listeners, prescription-determined gain was applied to the stimuli, and performance using the beamformer was compared with that obtained using bilateral amplification. The listener identified speech from a target talker located straight ahead (0° azimuth) in the presence of four competing talkers that were either colocated with, or spatially separated from, the target. The stimuli were spatialized using measured impulse responses and presented via earphones. In the spatially separated masker conditions, the four maskers were arranged symmetrically around the target at ±15° and ±30° or at ±45° and ±90°. Results revealed that masked speech reception thresholds for spatially separated maskers were higher (poorer) on average for the SNHL than for the normal-hearing listeners. For most SNHL listeners in the wider masker separation condition, lower thresholds were obtained through the microphone array than through bilateral amplification. Large intersubject differences were found in both listener groups. The best masked speech reception thresholds overall were found for a hybrid condition that combined natural and beamforming listening in order to preserve localization for broadband sources.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515593385
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldkidd benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem
AT christinermason benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem
AT virginiabest benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem
AT jayaganeshswaminathan benefitsofacousticbeamformingforsolvingthecocktailpartyproblem
_version_ 1724419724944605184