Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices

This paper explores the embedding of data producing technologies in people's everyday lives and practices. It traces how repeated encounters with digital data operate to naturalise these entities, while often blindsiding their agentive properties and the ways they get implicated in processes of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gavin JD Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:Big Data & Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717751551
id doaj-46b332071371474aa84dbb9f592740c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46b332071371474aa84dbb9f592740c72020-11-25T03:51:59ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172018-01-01510.1177/2053951717751551Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practicesGavin JD SmithThis paper explores the embedding of data producing technologies in people's everyday lives and practices. It traces how repeated encounters with digital data operate to naturalise these entities, while often blindsiding their agentive properties and the ways they get implicated in processes of exploitation and governance. I propose and develop the notion of ‘data doxa’ to conceptualise the way in which digital data – and the devices and platforms that stage data – have come to be perceived in Western societies as normal, necessary and enabling. The ‘data doxa’ concept also accentuates the enculturation of many individuals into a data sharing habitus which frames digital technologies in simplistic terms as (a) panaceas for the problems associated with contemporary life, (b) figures of progress and convenience, and (c) mediums of knowledge, pleasure and identity. I suggest that three types of data-based relations contribute to the formation of this doxic sensibility: fetishisation, habit and enchantment. Each of these relations come to mediate public understandings of digital devices and the data they generate, obscuring the multifaceted nature and hidden depths of data and their propensity to double up as technologies of exposure and discipline. As a result of this situation, imaginative educational programs and revamped regulatory frameworks are urgently needed to inform individuals about the contribution of data to the leveraging of value and power in today's digital economies, but also to protect them from experiencing data-based harms.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717751551
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gavin JD Smith
spellingShingle Gavin JD Smith
Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices
Big Data & Society
author_facet Gavin JD Smith
author_sort Gavin JD Smith
title Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices
title_short Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices
title_full Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices
title_fullStr Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices
title_full_unstemmed Data doxa: The affective consequences of data practices
title_sort data doxa: the affective consequences of data practices
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Big Data & Society
issn 2053-9517
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper explores the embedding of data producing technologies in people's everyday lives and practices. It traces how repeated encounters with digital data operate to naturalise these entities, while often blindsiding their agentive properties and the ways they get implicated in processes of exploitation and governance. I propose and develop the notion of ‘data doxa’ to conceptualise the way in which digital data – and the devices and platforms that stage data – have come to be perceived in Western societies as normal, necessary and enabling. The ‘data doxa’ concept also accentuates the enculturation of many individuals into a data sharing habitus which frames digital technologies in simplistic terms as (a) panaceas for the problems associated with contemporary life, (b) figures of progress and convenience, and (c) mediums of knowledge, pleasure and identity. I suggest that three types of data-based relations contribute to the formation of this doxic sensibility: fetishisation, habit and enchantment. Each of these relations come to mediate public understandings of digital devices and the data they generate, obscuring the multifaceted nature and hidden depths of data and their propensity to double up as technologies of exposure and discipline. As a result of this situation, imaginative educational programs and revamped regulatory frameworks are urgently needed to inform individuals about the contribution of data to the leveraging of value and power in today's digital economies, but also to protect them from experiencing data-based harms.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717751551
work_keys_str_mv AT gavinjdsmith datadoxatheaffectiveconsequencesofdatapractices
_version_ 1724485073424613376