Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.

The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, (Homoptera: Aphididae) releases the volatile sesquiterpene (E)-beta-farnesene (EBF) when attacked by a predator, triggering escape responses in the aphid colony. Recently, it was shown that this alarm pheromone also mediates the production of the winged dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eduardo Hatano, Grit Kunert, Wolfgang W Weisser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-06-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20585639/?tool=EBI
id doaj-46b23773777c45a6b27b23a7c0b78d23
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46b23773777c45a6b27b23a7c0b78d232021-03-03T19:54:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-06-0156e1118810.1371/journal.pone.0011188Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.Eduardo HatanoGrit KunertWolfgang W WeisserThe pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, (Homoptera: Aphididae) releases the volatile sesquiterpene (E)-beta-farnesene (EBF) when attacked by a predator, triggering escape responses in the aphid colony. Recently, it was shown that this alarm pheromone also mediates the production of the winged dispersal morph under laboratory conditions. The present work tested the wing-inducing effect of EBF under field conditions. Aphid colonies were exposed to two treatments (control and EBF) and tested in two different environmental conditions (field and laboratory). As in previous experiments aphids produced higher proportion of winged morphs among their offspring when exposed to EBF in the laboratory but even under field conditions the proportion of winged offspring was higher after EBF application (6.84+/-0.98%) compared to the hexane control (1.54+/-0.25%). In the field, the proportion of adult aphids found on the plant at the end of the experiment was lower in the EBF treatment (58.1+/-5.5%) than in the control (66.9+/-4.6%), in contrast to the climate chamber test where the numbers of adult aphids found on the plant at the end of the experiment were, in both treatments, similar to the numbers put on the plant initially. Our results show that the role of EBF in aphid wing induction is also apparent under field conditions and they may indicate a potential cost of EBF emission. They also emphasize the importance of investigating the ecological role of induced defences under field conditions.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20585639/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eduardo Hatano
Grit Kunert
Wolfgang W Weisser
spellingShingle Eduardo Hatano
Grit Kunert
Wolfgang W Weisser
Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Eduardo Hatano
Grit Kunert
Wolfgang W Weisser
author_sort Eduardo Hatano
title Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
title_short Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
title_full Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
title_fullStr Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
title_full_unstemmed Aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
title_sort aphid wing induction and ecological costs of alarm pheromone emission under field conditions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-06-01
description The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris, (Homoptera: Aphididae) releases the volatile sesquiterpene (E)-beta-farnesene (EBF) when attacked by a predator, triggering escape responses in the aphid colony. Recently, it was shown that this alarm pheromone also mediates the production of the winged dispersal morph under laboratory conditions. The present work tested the wing-inducing effect of EBF under field conditions. Aphid colonies were exposed to two treatments (control and EBF) and tested in two different environmental conditions (field and laboratory). As in previous experiments aphids produced higher proportion of winged morphs among their offspring when exposed to EBF in the laboratory but even under field conditions the proportion of winged offspring was higher after EBF application (6.84+/-0.98%) compared to the hexane control (1.54+/-0.25%). In the field, the proportion of adult aphids found on the plant at the end of the experiment was lower in the EBF treatment (58.1+/-5.5%) than in the control (66.9+/-4.6%), in contrast to the climate chamber test where the numbers of adult aphids found on the plant at the end of the experiment were, in both treatments, similar to the numbers put on the plant initially. Our results show that the role of EBF in aphid wing induction is also apparent under field conditions and they may indicate a potential cost of EBF emission. They also emphasize the importance of investigating the ecological role of induced defences under field conditions.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20585639/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardohatano aphidwinginductionandecologicalcostsofalarmpheromoneemissionunderfieldconditions
AT gritkunert aphidwinginductionandecologicalcostsofalarmpheromoneemissionunderfieldconditions
AT wolfgangwweisser aphidwinginductionandecologicalcostsofalarmpheromoneemissionunderfieldconditions
_version_ 1714825046451552256