Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparable health measures across different sets of populations are essential for describing the distribution of health outcomes and assessing the impact of interventions on these outcomes. Self-reported health (SRH) is a commonly us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahal Ajay, Chen Bradley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-11-01
Series:Population Health Metrics
Online Access:http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/8/1/30
id doaj-469e3fed00e0429fbb441066dd456674
record_format Article
spelling doaj-469e3fed00e0429fbb441066dd4566742020-11-24T21:44:56ZengBMCPopulation Health Metrics1478-79542010-11-01813010.1186/1478-7954-8-30Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey dataMahal AjayChen Bradley<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparable health measures across different sets of populations are essential for describing the distribution of health outcomes and assessing the impact of interventions on these outcomes. Self-reported health (SRH) is a commonly used indicator of health in household surveys and has been shown to be predictive of future mortality. However, the susceptibility of SRH to influence by individuals' expectations complicates its interpretation and undermines its usefulness.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This paper applies the empirical methodology of Lindeboom and van Doorslaer (2004) to investigate elderly health in India using data from the 52<sup>nd </sup>round of the National Sample Survey conducted in 1995-96 that includes both an SRH variable as well as a range of objective indicators of disability and ill health. The empirical testing was conducted on stratified homogeneous groups, based on four factors: gender, education, rural-urban residence, and region.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We find that region generally has a significant impact on how women perceive their health. Reporting heterogeneity can arise not only from cut-point shifts, but also from differences in health effects by objective health measures. In contrast, we find little evidence of reporting heterogeneity due to differences in gender or educational status within regions. Rural-urban residence does matter in some cases. The findings are robust with different specifications of objective health indicators.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our exercise supports the thesis that the region of residence is associated with different cut-points and reporting behavior on health surveys. We believe this is the first paper that applies the Lindeboom-van Doorslaer methodology to data on the elderly in a developing country, showing the feasibility of applying this methodology to data from many existing cross-sectional health surveys.</p> http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/8/1/30
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahal Ajay
Chen Bradley
spellingShingle Mahal Ajay
Chen Bradley
Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data
Population Health Metrics
author_facet Mahal Ajay
Chen Bradley
author_sort Mahal Ajay
title Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data
title_short Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data
title_full Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data
title_fullStr Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the health of the Indian elderly: evidence from National Sample Survey data
title_sort measuring the health of the indian elderly: evidence from national sample survey data
publisher BMC
series Population Health Metrics
issn 1478-7954
publishDate 2010-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparable health measures across different sets of populations are essential for describing the distribution of health outcomes and assessing the impact of interventions on these outcomes. Self-reported health (SRH) is a commonly used indicator of health in household surveys and has been shown to be predictive of future mortality. However, the susceptibility of SRH to influence by individuals' expectations complicates its interpretation and undermines its usefulness.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This paper applies the empirical methodology of Lindeboom and van Doorslaer (2004) to investigate elderly health in India using data from the 52<sup>nd </sup>round of the National Sample Survey conducted in 1995-96 that includes both an SRH variable as well as a range of objective indicators of disability and ill health. The empirical testing was conducted on stratified homogeneous groups, based on four factors: gender, education, rural-urban residence, and region.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We find that region generally has a significant impact on how women perceive their health. Reporting heterogeneity can arise not only from cut-point shifts, but also from differences in health effects by objective health measures. In contrast, we find little evidence of reporting heterogeneity due to differences in gender or educational status within regions. Rural-urban residence does matter in some cases. The findings are robust with different specifications of objective health indicators.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our exercise supports the thesis that the region of residence is associated with different cut-points and reporting behavior on health surveys. We believe this is the first paper that applies the Lindeboom-van Doorslaer methodology to data on the elderly in a developing country, showing the feasibility of applying this methodology to data from many existing cross-sectional health surveys.</p>
url http://www.pophealthmetrics.com/content/8/1/30
work_keys_str_mv AT mahalajay measuringthehealthoftheindianelderlyevidencefromnationalsamplesurveydata
AT chenbradley measuringthehealthoftheindianelderlyevidencefromnationalsamplesurveydata
_version_ 1725907721314631680