Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis

Digital and intelligent buildings are critical to realizing efficient building energy operations and a smart grid. With the increasing digitalization of processes throughout the life cycle of buildings, data exchanged between stakeholders and between building systems have grown significantly. Howeve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Pritoni, Drew Paine, Gabriel Fierro, Cory Mosiman, Michael Poplawski, Avijit Saha, Joel Bender, Jessica Granderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/2024
id doaj-469a6c63b4ae49bda0adfd561144b758
record_format Article
spelling doaj-469a6c63b4ae49bda0adfd561144b7582021-04-06T23:05:22ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-04-01142024202410.3390/en14072024Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case AnalysisMarco Pritoni0Drew Paine1Gabriel Fierro2Cory Mosiman3Michael Poplawski4Avijit Saha5Joel Bender6Jessica Granderson7Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USALawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USAElectrical Engineering & Computer Sciences Department, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USANational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USAPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USANational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401, USABuilding Automation and Control Systems Integration Group, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USALawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADigital and intelligent buildings are critical to realizing efficient building energy operations and a smart grid. With the increasing digitalization of processes throughout the life cycle of buildings, data exchanged between stakeholders and between building systems have grown significantly. However, a lack of semantic interoperability between data in different systems is still prevalent and hinders the development of energy-oriented applications that can be reused across buildings, limiting the scalability of innovative solutions. Addressing this challenge, our review paper systematically reviews metadata schemas and ontologies that are at the foundation of semantic interoperability necessary to move toward improved building energy operations. The review finds 40 schemas that span different phases of the building life cycle, most of which cover commercial building operations and, in particular, control and monitoring systems. The paper’s deeper review and analysis of five popular schemas identify several gaps in their ability to fully facilitate the work of a building modeler attempting to support three use cases: energy audits, automated fault detection and diagnosis, and optimal control. Our findings demonstrate that building modelers focused on energy use cases will find it difficult, labor intensive, and costly to create, sustain, and use semantic models with existing ontologies. This underscores the significant work still to be done to enable interoperable, usable, and maintainable building models. We make three recommendations for future work by the building modeling and energy communities: a centralized repository with a search engine for relevant schemas, the development of more use cases, and better harmonization and standardization of schemas in collaboration with industry to facilitate their adoption by stakeholders addressing varied energy-focused use cases.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/2024smart buildingsemantic modelontologymetadataenergy auditfault detection and diagnostics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Pritoni
Drew Paine
Gabriel Fierro
Cory Mosiman
Michael Poplawski
Avijit Saha
Joel Bender
Jessica Granderson
spellingShingle Marco Pritoni
Drew Paine
Gabriel Fierro
Cory Mosiman
Michael Poplawski
Avijit Saha
Joel Bender
Jessica Granderson
Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis
Energies
smart building
semantic model
ontology
metadata
energy audit
fault detection and diagnostics
author_facet Marco Pritoni
Drew Paine
Gabriel Fierro
Cory Mosiman
Michael Poplawski
Avijit Saha
Joel Bender
Jessica Granderson
author_sort Marco Pritoni
title Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis
title_short Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis
title_full Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis
title_fullStr Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Metadata Schemas and Ontologies for Building Energy Applications: A Critical Review and Use Case Analysis
title_sort metadata schemas and ontologies for building energy applications: a critical review and use case analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Digital and intelligent buildings are critical to realizing efficient building energy operations and a smart grid. With the increasing digitalization of processes throughout the life cycle of buildings, data exchanged between stakeholders and between building systems have grown significantly. However, a lack of semantic interoperability between data in different systems is still prevalent and hinders the development of energy-oriented applications that can be reused across buildings, limiting the scalability of innovative solutions. Addressing this challenge, our review paper systematically reviews metadata schemas and ontologies that are at the foundation of semantic interoperability necessary to move toward improved building energy operations. The review finds 40 schemas that span different phases of the building life cycle, most of which cover commercial building operations and, in particular, control and monitoring systems. The paper’s deeper review and analysis of five popular schemas identify several gaps in their ability to fully facilitate the work of a building modeler attempting to support three use cases: energy audits, automated fault detection and diagnosis, and optimal control. Our findings demonstrate that building modelers focused on energy use cases will find it difficult, labor intensive, and costly to create, sustain, and use semantic models with existing ontologies. This underscores the significant work still to be done to enable interoperable, usable, and maintainable building models. We make three recommendations for future work by the building modeling and energy communities: a centralized repository with a search engine for relevant schemas, the development of more use cases, and better harmonization and standardization of schemas in collaboration with industry to facilitate their adoption by stakeholders addressing varied energy-focused use cases.
topic smart building
semantic model
ontology
metadata
energy audit
fault detection and diagnostics
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/2024
work_keys_str_mv AT marcopritoni metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT drewpaine metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT gabrielfierro metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT corymosiman metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT michaelpoplawski metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT avijitsaha metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT joelbender metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
AT jessicagranderson metadataschemasandontologiesforbuildingenergyapplicationsacriticalreviewandusecaseanalysis
_version_ 1721537096755183616