The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution

Agricultural water pollution in Finland is mainly caused by nutrient losses from fields. Nutrient losses can be mitigated, e.g., by changing management practices and by plant rotation. Adoption of the necessary measures may be voluntary, but economic incentives can also be used. Nutrient losses can...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asko Miettinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 1993-12-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/72508
id doaj-469976850e8745b7adfdaa6324bfb024
record_format Article
spelling doaj-469976850e8745b7adfdaa6324bfb0242020-11-24T22:40:48ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18951993-12-0126The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollutionAsko Miettinen0Water and Environment Research Institute, P.O. Box 250, FIN-00101 Helsinki, FinlandAgricultural water pollution in Finland is mainly caused by nutrient losses from fields. Nutrient losses can be mitigated, e.g., by changing management practices and by plant rotation. Adoption of the necessary measures may be voluntary, but economic incentives can also be used. Nutrient losses can be regulated, e.g., by incentives to decrease the use of fertilizers. Economic incentives include a change in product prices, an input tax or an input quota. So far an input tax has been applied in Finnish agriculture. The effectiveness and feasibility of these policy measures on the farm can be assessed by calculating the change in farm profit and nutrient losses. The input quota was found to be the least-cost measure at the farm level when the marginal abatement costs of measures were compared on a grain farm growing barley. Alternative policy measures caused bigger losses in profit on the farm and the reduction in nitrogen leakage was smaller.https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/72508
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Asko Miettinen
spellingShingle Asko Miettinen
The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
Agricultural and Food Science
author_facet Asko Miettinen
author_sort Asko Miettinen
title The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
title_short The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
title_full The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
title_fullStr The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
title_sort effectiveness and feasibility of economic incentives of input control in the mitigation of agricultural water pollution
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
series Agricultural and Food Science
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
publishDate 1993-12-01
description Agricultural water pollution in Finland is mainly caused by nutrient losses from fields. Nutrient losses can be mitigated, e.g., by changing management practices and by plant rotation. Adoption of the necessary measures may be voluntary, but economic incentives can also be used. Nutrient losses can be regulated, e.g., by incentives to decrease the use of fertilizers. Economic incentives include a change in product prices, an input tax or an input quota. So far an input tax has been applied in Finnish agriculture. The effectiveness and feasibility of these policy measures on the farm can be assessed by calculating the change in farm profit and nutrient losses. The input quota was found to be the least-cost measure at the farm level when the marginal abatement costs of measures were compared on a grain farm growing barley. Alternative policy measures caused bigger losses in profit on the farm and the reduction in nitrogen leakage was smaller.
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/72508
work_keys_str_mv AT askomiettinen theeffectivenessandfeasibilityofeconomicincentivesofinputcontrolinthemitigationofagriculturalwaterpollution
AT askomiettinen effectivenessandfeasibilityofeconomicincentivesofinputcontrolinthemitigationofagriculturalwaterpollution
_version_ 1725703175325876224