A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”

This paper offers a critical commentary of Ambedkar's posthumously published "The Philosophy of Hinduism," which was discovered shortly after his death.  Given previous, considerable contributions in the fields of law, economics, political and social theory, the work appears to be the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rajesh Sampath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Brandeis University Library 2020-02-01
Series:Caste
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.library.brandeis.edu/index.php/caste/article/view/141
id doaj-4697a03cf4224df6b727cd122cd704ce
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4697a03cf4224df6b727cd122cd704ce2021-05-27T16:47:10ZengBrandeis University LibraryCaste2639-49282020-02-0111172810.26812/caste.v1i1.141141A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”Rajesh SampathThis paper offers a critical commentary of Ambedkar's posthumously published "The Philosophy of Hinduism," which was discovered shortly after his death.  Given previous, considerable contributions in the fields of law, economics, political and social theory, the work appears to be the beginnings of what remains an incomplete treatise on a new area of investigation for Ambedkar.  In this work, Ambedkar tackles the murky and opaque sub-field of philosophy, namely the philosophy of religion.  This paper unpacks some of Ambedkar's key insights on the nature of the philosophy of religion to test what elements - considered from a philosophical point view - constitute a religion.  Furthermore, given the historical paradigmatic shifts in the nature of religion from antiquity to modernity, Ambedkar identifies two conceptual revolutions from which he will introduce two criteria - utility and justice - to evaluate the nature of Hinduism as a religion.  Given his life-long quest to understand Hinduism and caste, ultimately, Ambedkar's goal to overcome what he says is the systemic and structural inequality of caste in the Indian social order leads him to certain negative conclusions: namely whether Hinduism can be characterized as a religion if in fact modern religions must have a foundation in some intrinsic dimension of social justice.  This paper constitutes Part I of a longer commentary.  The aspiration is that a longer Part II will ultimately extend Ambedkar's philosophical investigation into new domains for which he did not have the opportunity to explore.https://journals.library.brandeis.edu/index.php/caste/article/view/141ambedkarhinduismphilosophy of religionsocial justice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rajesh Sampath
spellingShingle Rajesh Sampath
A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”
Caste
ambedkar
hinduism
philosophy of religion
social justice
author_facet Rajesh Sampath
author_sort Rajesh Sampath
title A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”
title_short A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”
title_full A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”
title_fullStr A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”
title_full_unstemmed A Commentary on Ambedkar’s Posthumously Published “Philosophy of Hinduism”
title_sort commentary on ambedkar’s posthumously published “philosophy of hinduism”
publisher Brandeis University Library
series Caste
issn 2639-4928
publishDate 2020-02-01
description This paper offers a critical commentary of Ambedkar's posthumously published "The Philosophy of Hinduism," which was discovered shortly after his death.  Given previous, considerable contributions in the fields of law, economics, political and social theory, the work appears to be the beginnings of what remains an incomplete treatise on a new area of investigation for Ambedkar.  In this work, Ambedkar tackles the murky and opaque sub-field of philosophy, namely the philosophy of religion.  This paper unpacks some of Ambedkar's key insights on the nature of the philosophy of religion to test what elements - considered from a philosophical point view - constitute a religion.  Furthermore, given the historical paradigmatic shifts in the nature of religion from antiquity to modernity, Ambedkar identifies two conceptual revolutions from which he will introduce two criteria - utility and justice - to evaluate the nature of Hinduism as a religion.  Given his life-long quest to understand Hinduism and caste, ultimately, Ambedkar's goal to overcome what he says is the systemic and structural inequality of caste in the Indian social order leads him to certain negative conclusions: namely whether Hinduism can be characterized as a religion if in fact modern religions must have a foundation in some intrinsic dimension of social justice.  This paper constitutes Part I of a longer commentary.  The aspiration is that a longer Part II will ultimately extend Ambedkar's philosophical investigation into new domains for which he did not have the opportunity to explore.
topic ambedkar
hinduism
philosophy of religion
social justice
url https://journals.library.brandeis.edu/index.php/caste/article/view/141
work_keys_str_mv AT rajeshsampath acommentaryonambedkarsposthumouslypublishedphilosophyofhinduism
AT rajeshsampath commentaryonambedkarsposthumouslypublishedphilosophyofhinduism
_version_ 1721425415943225344