Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial

Abstract Aims Although the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death has been evaluated, its effects on functional capacity in patients with HF and ejection fraction (EF) >40% has yet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rolf Wachter, Sanjiv J. Shah, Martin R. Cowie, Peter Szecsödy, Victor Shi, Ghionul Ibram, Ziqiang Zhao, Jianjian Gong, Sven Klebs, Burkert Pieske
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-06-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12694
id doaj-4683247719b24b2881869e1698809369
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4683247719b24b2881869e16988093692020-11-25T04:12:22ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222020-06-017385686410.1002/ehf2.12694Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trialRolf Wachter0Sanjiv J. Shah1Martin R. Cowie2Peter Szecsödy3Victor Shi4Ghionul Ibram5Ziqiang Zhao6Jianjian Gong7Sven Klebs8Burkert Pieske9Clinic and Policlinic for Cardiology University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig GermanyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL USAFaculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute Imperial College London UKNovartis Basel SwitzerlandNovartis East Hanover EastHanover NJ USANovartis East Hanover EastHanover NJ USANovartis Shanghai ChinaNovartis East Hanover EastHanover NJ USANovartis Pharma GmbH Nuremberg GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum Charité University Medicine Berlin Berlin GermanyAbstract Aims Although the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death has been evaluated, its effects on functional capacity in patients with HF and ejection fraction (EF) >40% has yet to be determined. In addition, no prior studies have compared sacubitril/valsartan with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. We sought to compare the effect of ARNI to background‐medication‐based individualized comparators (BMICs) on N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), functional capacity [6 min walk distance (6MWD)], symptoms, and quality of life [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)] in patients with HF and EF >40% in a randomized clinical trial. Methods PARALLAX is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double‐blind multicentre clinical trial in patients with chronic symptomatic HF with EF >40%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV symptoms, elevated natriuretic peptides, and evidence of structural heart disease. Eligible patients are randomized to sacubitril/valsartan vs. BMIC for cardiovascular and related co‐morbidities. BMIC includes (i) enalapril, (ii) valsartan, and (iii) placebo depending on the type of medical therapy prior to enrolment. The primary endpoints are the change in plasma NT‐proBNP concentration from baseline to 12 weeks and the change from baseline in 6MWD distance at 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints assess quality of life and symptom burden. Conclusions PARALLAX will determine if sacubitril/valsartan compared with standard medical therapy for co‐morbidities improves NT‐proBNP levels, exercise capacity, quality of life, and symptom burden in HF patients with EF >40%.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12694Heart failure with preserved ejection fractionHeart failure with mid‐range ejection fractionFunctional capacityQuality of lifeNeprilysin inhibitionRandomized controlled trial
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rolf Wachter
Sanjiv J. Shah
Martin R. Cowie
Peter Szecsödy
Victor Shi
Ghionul Ibram
Ziqiang Zhao
Jianjian Gong
Sven Klebs
Burkert Pieske
spellingShingle Rolf Wachter
Sanjiv J. Shah
Martin R. Cowie
Peter Szecsödy
Victor Shi
Ghionul Ibram
Ziqiang Zhao
Jianjian Gong
Sven Klebs
Burkert Pieske
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
ESC Heart Failure
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction
Functional capacity
Quality of life
Neprilysin inhibition
Randomized controlled trial
author_facet Rolf Wachter
Sanjiv J. Shah
Martin R. Cowie
Peter Szecsödy
Victor Shi
Ghionul Ibram
Ziqiang Zhao
Jianjian Gong
Sven Klebs
Burkert Pieske
author_sort Rolf Wachter
title Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
title_short Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
title_full Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
title_fullStr Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
title_full_unstemmed Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
title_sort angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized raas blockade: design and rationale of the parallax trial
publisher Wiley
series ESC Heart Failure
issn 2055-5822
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Aims Although the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death has been evaluated, its effects on functional capacity in patients with HF and ejection fraction (EF) >40% has yet to be determined. In addition, no prior studies have compared sacubitril/valsartan with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. We sought to compare the effect of ARNI to background‐medication‐based individualized comparators (BMICs) on N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP), functional capacity [6 min walk distance (6MWD)], symptoms, and quality of life [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)] in patients with HF and EF >40% in a randomized clinical trial. Methods PARALLAX is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double‐blind multicentre clinical trial in patients with chronic symptomatic HF with EF >40%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV symptoms, elevated natriuretic peptides, and evidence of structural heart disease. Eligible patients are randomized to sacubitril/valsartan vs. BMIC for cardiovascular and related co‐morbidities. BMIC includes (i) enalapril, (ii) valsartan, and (iii) placebo depending on the type of medical therapy prior to enrolment. The primary endpoints are the change in plasma NT‐proBNP concentration from baseline to 12 weeks and the change from baseline in 6MWD distance at 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints assess quality of life and symptom burden. Conclusions PARALLAX will determine if sacubitril/valsartan compared with standard medical therapy for co‐morbidities improves NT‐proBNP levels, exercise capacity, quality of life, and symptom burden in HF patients with EF >40%.
topic Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction
Functional capacity
Quality of life
Neprilysin inhibition
Randomized controlled trial
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12694
work_keys_str_mv AT rolfwachter angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT sanjivjshah angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT martinrcowie angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT peterszecsody angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT victorshi angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT ghionulibram angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT ziqiangzhao angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT jianjiangong angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT svenklebs angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
AT burkertpieske angiotensinreceptorneprilysininhibitionversusindividualizedraasblockadedesignandrationaleoftheparallaxtrial
_version_ 1724415677237821440