Use of ordinal multi-criteria methods in the analysis of the Formula 1 World Championship

• Main Authors: João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Mello, Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro Gomes, Eliane Gonçalves Gomes, Maria Helena Campos Soares de Mello
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas
• Series: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
• Subjects: Borda method; Condorcet method; Copeland method
• Online Access: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-39512005000200004&lng=en&tlng=en

Sporting activities apply various multi-criteria (and multi-decision maker) methods in their championship regulations. In the majority of cases, the organizers are not aware that they are using them and indeed often apply them incorrectly. Variations of the Borda voting and lexicographic methods are among those most widely used. In the case of the Formula 1 World Championship, a variation of the Borda method is employed. This article shows that some of the problems that occurred during recent seasons are a result of the use of this method with consequent aggravation of the inherent distortions. Furthermore, the use of the Condorcet method is suggested as an alternative. Its limitations are shown, as well as how to overcome them by employing the Copeland method. Lastly, an analysis of the results of the 2002 championship is conducted.