A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming
A number of quantitative studies of pair programming (the practice of two programmers working together using just one computer) have partially conflicting results. Qualitative studies are needed to explain what is really going on. We support such studies by taking a grounded theory (GT) approach...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Jyväskylä
2008-01-01
|
Series: | Human Technology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://humantechnology.jyu.fi/articles/volume4/2008/salinger-plonka-prechelt.pdf |
id |
doaj-467c0d5b986141e3a2b857e9a754d344 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-467c0d5b986141e3a2b857e9a754d3442020-11-25T01:56:00ZengUniversity of JyväskyläHuman Technology1795-68892008-01-014192510.17011/ht/urn.200804151350A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair ProgrammingStephan Salinger0Laura Plonka1Lutz Prechelt2Freie Universität BerlinFreie Universität BerlinFreie Universität BerlinA number of quantitative studies of pair programming (the practice of two programmers working together using just one computer) have partially conflicting results. Qualitative studies are needed to explain what is really going on. We support such studies by taking a grounded theory (GT) approach for deriving a coding scheme for the objective conceptual description of specific pair programming sessions independent of a particular research goal. The present article explains why our initial attempts at using GT failed and describes how to avoid these difficulties by a predetermined perspective on the data, concept naming rules, an analysis results metamodel, and pair coding. These practices may be helpful in all GT situations, particularly those involving very rich data such as video data. We illustrate the operation and usefulness of these practices by real examples derived from our coding work and present a few preliminary hypotheses regarding pair programming that have surfaced.http://humantechnology.jyu.fi/articles/volume4/2008/salinger-plonka-prechelt.pdfpair programminggrounded theorycoding scheme developmentqualitative data analysisvideo data |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephan Salinger Laura Plonka Lutz Prechelt |
spellingShingle |
Stephan Salinger Laura Plonka Lutz Prechelt A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming Human Technology pair programming grounded theory coding scheme development qualitative data analysis video data |
author_facet |
Stephan Salinger Laura Plonka Lutz Prechelt |
author_sort |
Stephan Salinger |
title |
A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming |
title_short |
A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming |
title_full |
A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming |
title_fullStr |
A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Coding Scheme Development Methodology Using Grounded Theory For Qualitative Analysis Of Pair Programming |
title_sort |
coding scheme development methodology using grounded theory for qualitative analysis of pair programming |
publisher |
University of Jyväskylä |
series |
Human Technology |
issn |
1795-6889 |
publishDate |
2008-01-01 |
description |
A number of quantitative studies of pair programming (the practice of two programmers working together using just one computer) have partially conflicting results. Qualitative studies are needed to explain what is really going on. We support such studies by taking a grounded theory (GT) approach for deriving a coding scheme for the objective conceptual description of specific pair programming sessions independent of a particular research goal. The present article explains why our initial attempts at using GT failed and describes how to avoid these difficulties by a predetermined perspective on the data, concept naming rules, an analysis results metamodel, and pair coding. These practices may be helpful in all GT situations, particularly those involving very rich data such as video data. We illustrate the operation and usefulness of these practices by real examples derived from our coding work and present a few preliminary hypotheses regarding pair programming that have surfaced. |
topic |
pair programming grounded theory coding scheme development qualitative data analysis video data |
url |
http://humantechnology.jyu.fi/articles/volume4/2008/salinger-plonka-prechelt.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephansalinger acodingschemedevelopmentmethodologyusinggroundedtheoryforqualitativeanalysisofpairprogramming AT lauraplonka acodingschemedevelopmentmethodologyusinggroundedtheoryforqualitativeanalysisofpairprogramming AT lutzprechelt acodingschemedevelopmentmethodologyusinggroundedtheoryforqualitativeanalysisofpairprogramming AT stephansalinger codingschemedevelopmentmethodologyusinggroundedtheoryforqualitativeanalysisofpairprogramming AT lauraplonka codingschemedevelopmentmethodologyusinggroundedtheoryforqualitativeanalysisofpairprogramming AT lutzprechelt codingschemedevelopmentmethodologyusinggroundedtheoryforqualitativeanalysisofpairprogramming |
_version_ |
1724982311861092352 |