Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage
This study seeks to evaluate the response of 17 yellow Quality Protein Maize (QPM) inbred line seedlings to drought stress (DS), using different morphophysiological traits (plant height (PH), chlorophyll content (CC), stem diameter (SD), proline content (Pro), photochemical efficiency of photosystem...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Agronomy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/8/12/287 |
id |
doaj-46799be07aae43719615a62e93106320 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-46799be07aae43719615a62e931063202021-04-02T07:49:38ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952018-12-0181228710.3390/agronomy8120287agronomy8120287Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling StageNyasha E. Chiuta0Charles S. Mutengwa1Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South AfricaDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South AfricaThis study seeks to evaluate the response of 17 yellow Quality Protein Maize (QPM) inbred line seedlings to drought stress (DS), using different morphophysiological traits (plant height (PH), chlorophyll content (CC), stem diameter (SD), proline content (Pro), photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PS II), canopy temperature (CT) and substomatal carbon dioxide concentration (C<i>i</i>). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times in a growth chamber. The seedlings were exposed to DS treatment by growing them at 20% field capacity. The control/well-watered (WW) treatments were kept at 80% field capacity throughout the experiment. Highly significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed for PH, SD, and Pro across environments. On the other hand, significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed for CC and PS II, while DS had no significant effects on C<i>i</i> and CT. Proline content increased under DS compared to WW conditions. Inbred lines L34, L7, L5, L2, L16, and L6 had approximately equal or more Pro than the drought tolerant check (ZM1523). As such, these lines were regarded as drought tolerant. Taking all measured parameters into consideration, L7 performed notably better than the other inbred lines under DS.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/8/12/287drought stressmorphophysiological traitsprolineQPMtolerant |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nyasha E. Chiuta Charles S. Mutengwa |
spellingShingle |
Nyasha E. Chiuta Charles S. Mutengwa Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage Agronomy drought stress morphophysiological traits proline QPM tolerant |
author_facet |
Nyasha E. Chiuta Charles S. Mutengwa |
author_sort |
Nyasha E. Chiuta |
title |
Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage |
title_short |
Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage |
title_full |
Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage |
title_fullStr |
Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Response of Yellow Quality Protein Maize Inbred Lines to Drought stress at Seedling Stage |
title_sort |
response of yellow quality protein maize inbred lines to drought stress at seedling stage |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Agronomy |
issn |
2073-4395 |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
This study seeks to evaluate the response of 17 yellow Quality Protein Maize (QPM) inbred line seedlings to drought stress (DS), using different morphophysiological traits (plant height (PH), chlorophyll content (CC), stem diameter (SD), proline content (Pro), photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PS II), canopy temperature (CT) and substomatal carbon dioxide concentration (C<i>i</i>). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times in a growth chamber. The seedlings were exposed to DS treatment by growing them at 20% field capacity. The control/well-watered (WW) treatments were kept at 80% field capacity throughout the experiment. Highly significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.001) were observed for PH, SD, and Pro across environments. On the other hand, significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were observed for CC and PS II, while DS had no significant effects on C<i>i</i> and CT. Proline content increased under DS compared to WW conditions. Inbred lines L34, L7, L5, L2, L16, and L6 had approximately equal or more Pro than the drought tolerant check (ZM1523). As such, these lines were regarded as drought tolerant. Taking all measured parameters into consideration, L7 performed notably better than the other inbred lines under DS. |
topic |
drought stress morphophysiological traits proline QPM tolerant |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/8/12/287 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nyashaechiuta responseofyellowqualityproteinmaizeinbredlinestodroughtstressatseedlingstage AT charlessmutengwa responseofyellowqualityproteinmaizeinbredlinestodroughtstressatseedlingstage |
_version_ |
1724170774515810304 |