The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

When selective pressures differ between males and females, the genes experiencing these conflicting evolutionary forces are said to be sexually antagonistic. Although the phenotypic effect of these genes has been documented in both wild and laboratory populations, their identity, number, and locatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo Innocenti, Edward H Morrow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-03-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20305719/?tool=EBI
id doaj-4678c7f21f4144fd9557264ccf4f1971
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4678c7f21f4144fd9557264ccf4f19712021-07-02T21:21:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852010-03-0183e100033510.1371/journal.pbio.1000335The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.Paolo InnocentiEdward H MorrowWhen selective pressures differ between males and females, the genes experiencing these conflicting evolutionary forces are said to be sexually antagonistic. Although the phenotypic effect of these genes has been documented in both wild and laboratory populations, their identity, number, and location remains unknown. Here, by combining data on sex-specific fitness and genome-wide transcript abundance in a quantitative genetic framework, we identified a group of candidate genes experiencing sexually antagonistic selection in the adult, which correspond to 8% of Drosophila melanogaster genes. As predicted, the X chromosome is enriched for these genes, but surprisingly they represent only a small proportion of the total number of sex-biased transcripts, indicating that the latter is a poor predictor of sexual antagonism. Furthermore, the majority of genes whose expression profiles showed a significant relationship with either male or female adult fitness are also sexually antagonistic. These results provide a first insight into the genetic basis of intralocus sexual conflict and indicate that genetic variation for fitness is dominated and maintained by sexual antagonism, potentially neutralizing any indirect genetic benefits of sexual selection.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20305719/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paolo Innocenti
Edward H Morrow
spellingShingle Paolo Innocenti
Edward H Morrow
The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Paolo Innocenti
Edward H Morrow
author_sort Paolo Innocenti
title The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
title_short The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
title_full The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
title_fullStr The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
title_full_unstemmed The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
title_sort sexually antagonistic genes of drosophila melanogaster.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2010-03-01
description When selective pressures differ between males and females, the genes experiencing these conflicting evolutionary forces are said to be sexually antagonistic. Although the phenotypic effect of these genes has been documented in both wild and laboratory populations, their identity, number, and location remains unknown. Here, by combining data on sex-specific fitness and genome-wide transcript abundance in a quantitative genetic framework, we identified a group of candidate genes experiencing sexually antagonistic selection in the adult, which correspond to 8% of Drosophila melanogaster genes. As predicted, the X chromosome is enriched for these genes, but surprisingly they represent only a small proportion of the total number of sex-biased transcripts, indicating that the latter is a poor predictor of sexual antagonism. Furthermore, the majority of genes whose expression profiles showed a significant relationship with either male or female adult fitness are also sexually antagonistic. These results provide a first insight into the genetic basis of intralocus sexual conflict and indicate that genetic variation for fitness is dominated and maintained by sexual antagonism, potentially neutralizing any indirect genetic benefits of sexual selection.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/20305719/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT paoloinnocenti thesexuallyantagonisticgenesofdrosophilamelanogaster
AT edwardhmorrow thesexuallyantagonisticgenesofdrosophilamelanogaster
AT paoloinnocenti sexuallyantagonisticgenesofdrosophilamelanogaster
AT edwardhmorrow sexuallyantagonisticgenesofdrosophilamelanogaster
_version_ 1721322043818901504