TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?

The present article is aimed at examining the category of the reality status by discussing the dichotomy “realis / irrealis” in the context of the categories of modality, habituality and futurity. Prototype analysis is juxtaposed with scope analysis, and the category of the habitual is discussed fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paulina Pietras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University 2017-12-01
Series:Respectus Philologicus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/13104
id doaj-4677c9a2134a45e3924440a74645d000
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4677c9a2134a45e3924440a74645d0002020-11-24T22:11:28ZengVilnius University Respectus Philologicus1392-82952335-23882017-12-01323710.15388/RESPECTUS.2017.32.37.09TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?Paulina Pietras0The Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce The present article is aimed at examining the category of the reality status by discussing the dichotomy “realis / irrealis” in the context of the categories of modality, habituality and futurity. Prototype analysis is juxtaposed with scope analysis, and the category of the habitual is discussed from the typological perspective as well as from the perspective of its connection with the category of futurity. The paper presents aspect diversity of habituals (perfective and imperfective aspect and its contextual implications) as well as the differentiation between the habitual and modality. A special focus is on the prototype analysis and its application instances in Polish, English and Hebrew. The primary objective of the paper is to show that, although it is possible to treat irrealis as notional category, the habituals in Polish and many other Slavic languages (e.g. Czech) should be identified with the modality domain rather than irrealis category. The paper is also an attempt to provide an insight into the distinction between (ir)realis and encoding systems of modalities as the habitual aspect displays modal category features in many languages (including Polish). http://www.journals.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/13104Reality Status (Realis/ Irrealis)HabitualModalityFuturityActualization of a SoA (State of Affairs)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulina Pietras
spellingShingle Paulina Pietras
TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?
Respectus Philologicus
Reality Status (Realis/ Irrealis)
Habitual
Modality
Futurity
Actualization of a SoA (State of Affairs)
author_facet Paulina Pietras
author_sort Paulina Pietras
title TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?
title_short TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?
title_full TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?
title_fullStr TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?
title_full_unstemmed TYPOLOGY OF THE REALITY STATUS CATEGORY IN SELECTED LANGUAGES. IS THE HABITUAL IN POLISH AN INSTANCE OF (IR)REALIS OR MODALITY?
title_sort typology of the reality status category in selected languages. is the habitual in polish an instance of (ir)realis or modality?
publisher Vilnius University
series Respectus Philologicus
issn 1392-8295
2335-2388
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The present article is aimed at examining the category of the reality status by discussing the dichotomy “realis / irrealis” in the context of the categories of modality, habituality and futurity. Prototype analysis is juxtaposed with scope analysis, and the category of the habitual is discussed from the typological perspective as well as from the perspective of its connection with the category of futurity. The paper presents aspect diversity of habituals (perfective and imperfective aspect and its contextual implications) as well as the differentiation between the habitual and modality. A special focus is on the prototype analysis and its application instances in Polish, English and Hebrew. The primary objective of the paper is to show that, although it is possible to treat irrealis as notional category, the habituals in Polish and many other Slavic languages (e.g. Czech) should be identified with the modality domain rather than irrealis category. The paper is also an attempt to provide an insight into the distinction between (ir)realis and encoding systems of modalities as the habitual aspect displays modal category features in many languages (including Polish).
topic Reality Status (Realis/ Irrealis)
Habitual
Modality
Futurity
Actualization of a SoA (State of Affairs)
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/13104
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinapietras typologyoftherealitystatuscategoryinselectedlanguagesisthehabitualinpolishaninstanceofirrealisormodality
_version_ 1725805590772449280