How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Improvements in communication and information technologies have allowed for the globalisation of health services, especially the provision of health services from other countries, such as the use of telemedicine. This has led countri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chanda Rupa, Martínez Álvarez Melisa, Smith Richard D
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-05-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Online Access:http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/7/1/17
id doaj-46776786a29c4b5cb8950df4de485339
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46776786a29c4b5cb8950df4de4853392020-11-25T00:42:04ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032011-05-01711710.1186/1744-8603-7-17How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and IndiaChanda RupaMartínez Álvarez MelisaSmith Richard D<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Improvements in communication and information technologies have allowed for the globalisation of health services, especially the provision of health services from other countries, such as the use of telemedicine. This has led countries to evaluate their position on whether and to what extent they should open their health systems to trade. This often takes place from the context of multi-lateral trade agreements (under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation), which is misplaced as a significant amount of trade takes place regionally or bi-laterally. We report here the results of a qualitative study assessing stakeholders' views on the potential for a bi-lateral trade relationship between India and the UK, where India acts as an exporter and the UK as an importer of telemedicine services.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>19 semi-structured interviews were carried out with stakeholders from India and the UK. The themes discussed include prospects on the viability of a bi-lateral relationship between the UK and India on telemedicine, current activities and operations, barriers, benefits and risks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The participants in general believed there were good prospects for telemedicine trade, and that this could bring benefits to "importing" countries in terms of cost-savings and faster delivery of care and to "exporting" countries in the form of foreign exchange and quality improvement. However, there were some concerns regarding quality of care, regulation, accreditation and data security.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>There is potential for trade in this type of health services to succeed and bring about important benefits to the countries involved. However, issues around data security and accreditation need to be taken into consideration. Countries may wish to consider entering bi-lateral agreements, as they provide more potential to address the concerns and capitalise on the benefits. Finally, this paper concludes that more data should be collected, both on the volume of telemedicine trade and on the impact it is having on health systems, as currently there is very limited data on this.</p> http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/7/1/17
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chanda Rupa
Martínez Álvarez Melisa
Smith Richard D
spellingShingle Chanda Rupa
Martínez Álvarez Melisa
Smith Richard D
How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
Globalization and Health
author_facet Chanda Rupa
Martínez Álvarez Melisa
Smith Richard D
author_sort Chanda Rupa
title How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
title_short How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
title_full How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
title_fullStr How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
title_full_unstemmed How is Telemedicine perceived? A qualitative study of perspectives from the UK and India
title_sort how is telemedicine perceived? a qualitative study of perspectives from the uk and india
publisher BMC
series Globalization and Health
issn 1744-8603
publishDate 2011-05-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Improvements in communication and information technologies have allowed for the globalisation of health services, especially the provision of health services from other countries, such as the use of telemedicine. This has led countries to evaluate their position on whether and to what extent they should open their health systems to trade. This often takes place from the context of multi-lateral trade agreements (under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation), which is misplaced as a significant amount of trade takes place regionally or bi-laterally. We report here the results of a qualitative study assessing stakeholders' views on the potential for a bi-lateral trade relationship between India and the UK, where India acts as an exporter and the UK as an importer of telemedicine services.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>19 semi-structured interviews were carried out with stakeholders from India and the UK. The themes discussed include prospects on the viability of a bi-lateral relationship between the UK and India on telemedicine, current activities and operations, barriers, benefits and risks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The participants in general believed there were good prospects for telemedicine trade, and that this could bring benefits to "importing" countries in terms of cost-savings and faster delivery of care and to "exporting" countries in the form of foreign exchange and quality improvement. However, there were some concerns regarding quality of care, regulation, accreditation and data security.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>There is potential for trade in this type of health services to succeed and bring about important benefits to the countries involved. However, issues around data security and accreditation need to be taken into consideration. Countries may wish to consider entering bi-lateral agreements, as they provide more potential to address the concerns and capitalise on the benefits. Finally, this paper concludes that more data should be collected, both on the volume of telemedicine trade and on the impact it is having on health systems, as currently there is very limited data on this.</p>
url http://www.globalizationandhealth.com/content/7/1/17
work_keys_str_mv AT chandarupa howistelemedicineperceivedaqualitativestudyofperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT martinezalvarezmelisa howistelemedicineperceivedaqualitativestudyofperspectivesfromtheukandindia
AT smithrichardd howistelemedicineperceivedaqualitativestudyofperspectivesfromtheukandindia
_version_ 1725284048335536128