Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland

<p><strong>Context:</strong> The measures taken to counter the COVID-19 pandemic restricted the circular migration of live-in care workers between their countries of origin and the elderly persons’ households.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> In this compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Leiblfinger, Veronika Prieler, Karin Schwiter, Jennifer Steiner, Aranka Benazha, Helma Lutz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LSE Press 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Long-Term Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.ilpnetwork.org/articles/51
id doaj-466ba65541cc4edba9a2c64d8ad5dfe8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-466ba65541cc4edba9a2c64d8ad5dfe82021-10-08T13:41:11ZengLSE PressJournal of Long-Term Care2516-91222020-10-010202010.31389/jltc.5135Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and SwitzerlandMichael Leiblfinger0Veronika Prieler1Karin Schwiter2Jennifer Steiner3Aranka Benazha4Helma Lutz5Johannes Kepler University LinzJohannes Kepler University LinzUniversity of ZurichUniversity of ZurichGoethe University FrankfurtGoethe University Frankfurt<p><strong>Context:</strong> The measures taken to counter the COVID-19 pandemic restricted the circular migration of live-in care workers between their countries of origin and the elderly persons’ households.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> In this comparative policy analysis, the impact of COVID-19 related policy measures for transnationally organised live-in care in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland is investigated.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Policy measures and media debates were analysed and inquiries with care workers, representatives of care agencies, unions, and activist groups were carried out between March and June 2020.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> In accordance with their institutionalisation of live-in care, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland responded differently to the challenges the pandemic posed to live-in care arrangements. However, all three countries focused on extending care workers’ rotas and re-establishing transnational mobility. These priorities subordinated the interests of care workers to those of care recipients. Furthermore, the measures remained short-term solutions that failed to acknowledge the fundamental flaws and inequalities of a care model that relies primarily on female migrant workers and wage differentials within Europe.</p><p><strong>Limitations:</strong> This policy comparison is based on an in-depth analysis of COVID-19 related policies, supplemented by inquiries among stakeholders with whom research had been done prior to the pandemic. More in-depth interviews are required to further substantiate the findings concerning their perspectives and gain insight into the longer-term effects of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Implications:</strong> The pandemic has brought the flaws of the live-in care model to the fore. Countries need to rethink their fragile care policies, which build on social inequality and uninhibited transnational mobility.</p>https://journal.ilpnetwork.org/articles/51live-in carehome-based caretransnational caremigrationcare workercovid-19 policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Leiblfinger
Veronika Prieler
Karin Schwiter
Jennifer Steiner
Aranka Benazha
Helma Lutz
spellingShingle Michael Leiblfinger
Veronika Prieler
Karin Schwiter
Jennifer Steiner
Aranka Benazha
Helma Lutz
Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
Journal of Long-Term Care
live-in care
home-based care
transnational care
migration
care worker
covid-19 policy
author_facet Michael Leiblfinger
Veronika Prieler
Karin Schwiter
Jennifer Steiner
Aranka Benazha
Helma Lutz
author_sort Michael Leiblfinger
title Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
title_short Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
title_full Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
title_fullStr Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
title_sort impact of covid-19 policy responses on live-in care workers in austria, germany, and switzerland
publisher LSE Press
series Journal of Long-Term Care
issn 2516-9122
publishDate 2020-10-01
description <p><strong>Context:</strong> The measures taken to counter the COVID-19 pandemic restricted the circular migration of live-in care workers between their countries of origin and the elderly persons’ households.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> In this comparative policy analysis, the impact of COVID-19 related policy measures for transnationally organised live-in care in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland is investigated.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Policy measures and media debates were analysed and inquiries with care workers, representatives of care agencies, unions, and activist groups were carried out between March and June 2020.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> In accordance with their institutionalisation of live-in care, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland responded differently to the challenges the pandemic posed to live-in care arrangements. However, all three countries focused on extending care workers’ rotas and re-establishing transnational mobility. These priorities subordinated the interests of care workers to those of care recipients. Furthermore, the measures remained short-term solutions that failed to acknowledge the fundamental flaws and inequalities of a care model that relies primarily on female migrant workers and wage differentials within Europe.</p><p><strong>Limitations:</strong> This policy comparison is based on an in-depth analysis of COVID-19 related policies, supplemented by inquiries among stakeholders with whom research had been done prior to the pandemic. More in-depth interviews are required to further substantiate the findings concerning their perspectives and gain insight into the longer-term effects of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Implications:</strong> The pandemic has brought the flaws of the live-in care model to the fore. Countries need to rethink their fragile care policies, which build on social inequality and uninhibited transnational mobility.</p>
topic live-in care
home-based care
transnational care
migration
care worker
covid-19 policy
url https://journal.ilpnetwork.org/articles/51
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelleiblfinger impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland
AT veronikaprieler impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland
AT karinschwiter impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland
AT jennifersteiner impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland
AT arankabenazha impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland
AT helmalutz impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland
_version_ 1716838265161515008