Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland
<p><strong>Context:</strong> The measures taken to counter the COVID-19 pandemic restricted the circular migration of live-in care workers between their countries of origin and the elderly persons’ households.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> In this compar...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
LSE Press
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Long-Term Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.ilpnetwork.org/articles/51 |
id |
doaj-466ba65541cc4edba9a2c64d8ad5dfe8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-466ba65541cc4edba9a2c64d8ad5dfe82021-10-08T13:41:11ZengLSE PressJournal of Long-Term Care2516-91222020-10-010202010.31389/jltc.5135Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and SwitzerlandMichael Leiblfinger0Veronika Prieler1Karin Schwiter2Jennifer Steiner3Aranka Benazha4Helma Lutz5Johannes Kepler University LinzJohannes Kepler University LinzUniversity of ZurichUniversity of ZurichGoethe University FrankfurtGoethe University Frankfurt<p><strong>Context:</strong> The measures taken to counter the COVID-19 pandemic restricted the circular migration of live-in care workers between their countries of origin and the elderly persons’ households.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> In this comparative policy analysis, the impact of COVID-19 related policy measures for transnationally organised live-in care in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland is investigated.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Policy measures and media debates were analysed and inquiries with care workers, representatives of care agencies, unions, and activist groups were carried out between March and June 2020.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> In accordance with their institutionalisation of live-in care, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland responded differently to the challenges the pandemic posed to live-in care arrangements. However, all three countries focused on extending care workers’ rotas and re-establishing transnational mobility. These priorities subordinated the interests of care workers to those of care recipients. Furthermore, the measures remained short-term solutions that failed to acknowledge the fundamental flaws and inequalities of a care model that relies primarily on female migrant workers and wage differentials within Europe.</p><p><strong>Limitations:</strong> This policy comparison is based on an in-depth analysis of COVID-19 related policies, supplemented by inquiries among stakeholders with whom research had been done prior to the pandemic. More in-depth interviews are required to further substantiate the findings concerning their perspectives and gain insight into the longer-term effects of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Implications:</strong> The pandemic has brought the flaws of the live-in care model to the fore. Countries need to rethink their fragile care policies, which build on social inequality and uninhibited transnational mobility.</p>https://journal.ilpnetwork.org/articles/51live-in carehome-based caretransnational caremigrationcare workercovid-19 policy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael Leiblfinger Veronika Prieler Karin Schwiter Jennifer Steiner Aranka Benazha Helma Lutz |
spellingShingle |
Michael Leiblfinger Veronika Prieler Karin Schwiter Jennifer Steiner Aranka Benazha Helma Lutz Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland Journal of Long-Term Care live-in care home-based care transnational care migration care worker covid-19 policy |
author_facet |
Michael Leiblfinger Veronika Prieler Karin Schwiter Jennifer Steiner Aranka Benazha Helma Lutz |
author_sort |
Michael Leiblfinger |
title |
Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland |
title_short |
Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland |
title_full |
Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland |
title_fullStr |
Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of COVID-19 Policy Responses on Live-In Care Workers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland |
title_sort |
impact of covid-19 policy responses on live-in care workers in austria, germany, and switzerland |
publisher |
LSE Press |
series |
Journal of Long-Term Care |
issn |
2516-9122 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
<p><strong>Context:</strong> The measures taken to counter the COVID-19 pandemic restricted the circular migration of live-in care workers between their countries of origin and the elderly persons’ households.</p><p><strong>Objective:</strong> In this comparative policy analysis, the impact of COVID-19 related policy measures for transnationally organised live-in care in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland is investigated.</p><p><strong>Method:</strong> Policy measures and media debates were analysed and inquiries with care workers, representatives of care agencies, unions, and activist groups were carried out between March and June 2020.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> In accordance with their institutionalisation of live-in care, Austria, Germany, and Switzerland responded differently to the challenges the pandemic posed to live-in care arrangements. However, all three countries focused on extending care workers’ rotas and re-establishing transnational mobility. These priorities subordinated the interests of care workers to those of care recipients. Furthermore, the measures remained short-term solutions that failed to acknowledge the fundamental flaws and inequalities of a care model that relies primarily on female migrant workers and wage differentials within Europe.</p><p><strong>Limitations:</strong> This policy comparison is based on an in-depth analysis of COVID-19 related policies, supplemented by inquiries among stakeholders with whom research had been done prior to the pandemic. More in-depth interviews are required to further substantiate the findings concerning their perspectives and gain insight into the longer-term effects of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Implications:</strong> The pandemic has brought the flaws of the live-in care model to the fore. Countries need to rethink their fragile care policies, which build on social inequality and uninhibited transnational mobility.</p> |
topic |
live-in care home-based care transnational care migration care worker covid-19 policy |
url |
https://journal.ilpnetwork.org/articles/51 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelleiblfinger impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland AT veronikaprieler impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland AT karinschwiter impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland AT jennifersteiner impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland AT arankabenazha impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland AT helmalutz impactofcovid19policyresponsesonliveincareworkersinaustriagermanyandswitzerland |
_version_ |
1716838265161515008 |