The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring
Risk models developed on one dataset are often applied to new data and, in such cases, it is prudent to check that the model is suitable for the new data. An important application is in the banking industry, where statistical models are applied to loans to determine provisions and capital requiremen...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Risks |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/53 |
id |
doaj-466410a742704ded8172c3b2cdb7aa53 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-466410a742704ded8172c3b2cdb7aa532020-11-25T01:01:28ZengMDPI AGRisks2227-90912019-05-01725310.3390/risks7020053risks7020053The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model MonitoringRoss Taplin0Clive Hunt1School of Accounting, Curtin Business School, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, AustraliaPrivate Practice, Perth, WA 6009, AustraliaRisk models developed on one dataset are often applied to new data and, in such cases, it is prudent to check that the model is suitable for the new data. An important application is in the banking industry, where statistical models are applied to loans to determine provisions and capital requirements. These models are developed on historical data, and regulations require their monitoring to ensure they remain valid on current portfolios—often years since the models were developed. The Population Stability Index (PSI) is an industry standard to measure whether the distribution of the current data has shifted significantly from the distribution of data used to develop the model. This paper explores several disadvantages of the PSI and proposes the Prediction Accuracy Index (PAI) as an alternative. The superior properties and interpretation of the PAI are discussed and it is concluded that the PAI can more accurately summarise the level of population stability, helping risk analysts and managers determine whether the model remains fit-for-purpose.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/53population stability index (PSI)Basel AccordIFRS 9model monitoringmodel validation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ross Taplin Clive Hunt |
spellingShingle |
Ross Taplin Clive Hunt The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring Risks population stability index (PSI) Basel Accord IFRS 9 model monitoring model validation |
author_facet |
Ross Taplin Clive Hunt |
author_sort |
Ross Taplin |
title |
The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring |
title_short |
The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring |
title_full |
The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring |
title_fullStr |
The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Population Accuracy Index: A New Measure of Population Stability for Model Monitoring |
title_sort |
population accuracy index: a new measure of population stability for model monitoring |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Risks |
issn |
2227-9091 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Risk models developed on one dataset are often applied to new data and, in such cases, it is prudent to check that the model is suitable for the new data. An important application is in the banking industry, where statistical models are applied to loans to determine provisions and capital requirements. These models are developed on historical data, and regulations require their monitoring to ensure they remain valid on current portfolios—often years since the models were developed. The Population Stability Index (PSI) is an industry standard to measure whether the distribution of the current data has shifted significantly from the distribution of data used to develop the model. This paper explores several disadvantages of the PSI and proposes the Prediction Accuracy Index (PAI) as an alternative. The superior properties and interpretation of the PAI are discussed and it is concluded that the PAI can more accurately summarise the level of population stability, helping risk analysts and managers determine whether the model remains fit-for-purpose. |
topic |
population stability index (PSI) Basel Accord IFRS 9 model monitoring model validation |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/7/2/53 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rosstaplin thepopulationaccuracyindexanewmeasureofpopulationstabilityformodelmonitoring AT clivehunt thepopulationaccuracyindexanewmeasureofpopulationstabilityformodelmonitoring AT rosstaplin populationaccuracyindexanewmeasureofpopulationstabilityformodelmonitoring AT clivehunt populationaccuracyindexanewmeasureofpopulationstabilityformodelmonitoring |
_version_ |
1725209270634414080 |