Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method

The Match method quantifies chemical ozone loss in the polar stratosphere. The basic idea consists in calculating the forward trajectory of an air parcel that has been probed by an ozone measurement (e.g., by an ozonesonde or satellite instrument) and finding a second ozone measurement close to this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Lehmann, P. von der Gathen, M. Rex, M. Streibel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2713/2005/acp-5-2713-2005.pdf
id doaj-46640c13b25447889e0d0d0f2e8ec549
record_format Article
spelling doaj-46640c13b25447889e0d0d0f2e8ec5492020-11-24T22:13:55ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242005-01-0151027132727Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match methodR. LehmannP. von der GathenM. RexM. StreibelThe Match method quantifies chemical ozone loss in the polar stratosphere. The basic idea consists in calculating the forward trajectory of an air parcel that has been probed by an ozone measurement (e.g., by an ozonesonde or satellite instrument) and finding a second ozone measurement close to this trajectory. Such an event is called a 'match'. A rate of chemical ozone destruction can be obtained by a statistical analysis of several tens of such match events. Information on the uncertainty of the calculated rate can be inferred from the scatter of the ozone mixing ratio difference (second measurement minus first measurement) associated with individual matches. A standard analysis would assume that the errors of these differences are statistically independent. However, this assumption may be violated because different matches can share a common ozone measurement, so that the errors associated with these match events become statistically dependent. Taking this effect into account, we present an analysis of the uncertainty of the final Match result. It has been applied to Match data from the Arctic winters 1995, 1996, 2000, and 2003. For these ozonesonde Match studies the effect of the error correlation on the uncertainty estimates is rather small: compared to a standard error analysis, the uncertainty estimates increase by 15% on average. However, the effect may be more pronounced for typical satellite Match analyses: for an Antarctic satellite Match study (2003), the uncertainty estimates increase by 60% on average. <P style='line-height: 20px;'> The analysis showed that the random errors of the ozone measurements and the 'net match errors', which result from a displacement of the second ozone measurement of a match from the required position, are of similar magnitude. This demonstrates that the criteria for accepting a match (maximum trajectory duration, match radius, spread of trajectory clusters etc.) ensure that, given the unavoidable ozone-measurement errors, the magnitude of the net match errors is adequate. The estimate of the random errors of the ozonesonde measurements agrees well with laboratory results.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2713/2005/acp-5-2713-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. Lehmann
P. von der Gathen
M. Rex
M. Streibel
spellingShingle R. Lehmann
P. von der Gathen
M. Rex
M. Streibel
Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet R. Lehmann
P. von der Gathen
M. Rex
M. Streibel
author_sort R. Lehmann
title Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method
title_short Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method
title_full Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method
title_fullStr Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method
title_full_unstemmed Statistical analysis of the precision of the Match method
title_sort statistical analysis of the precision of the match method
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2005-01-01
description The Match method quantifies chemical ozone loss in the polar stratosphere. The basic idea consists in calculating the forward trajectory of an air parcel that has been probed by an ozone measurement (e.g., by an ozonesonde or satellite instrument) and finding a second ozone measurement close to this trajectory. Such an event is called a 'match'. A rate of chemical ozone destruction can be obtained by a statistical analysis of several tens of such match events. Information on the uncertainty of the calculated rate can be inferred from the scatter of the ozone mixing ratio difference (second measurement minus first measurement) associated with individual matches. A standard analysis would assume that the errors of these differences are statistically independent. However, this assumption may be violated because different matches can share a common ozone measurement, so that the errors associated with these match events become statistically dependent. Taking this effect into account, we present an analysis of the uncertainty of the final Match result. It has been applied to Match data from the Arctic winters 1995, 1996, 2000, and 2003. For these ozonesonde Match studies the effect of the error correlation on the uncertainty estimates is rather small: compared to a standard error analysis, the uncertainty estimates increase by 15% on average. However, the effect may be more pronounced for typical satellite Match analyses: for an Antarctic satellite Match study (2003), the uncertainty estimates increase by 60% on average. <P style='line-height: 20px;'> The analysis showed that the random errors of the ozone measurements and the 'net match errors', which result from a displacement of the second ozone measurement of a match from the required position, are of similar magnitude. This demonstrates that the criteria for accepting a match (maximum trajectory duration, match radius, spread of trajectory clusters etc.) ensure that, given the unavoidable ozone-measurement errors, the magnitude of the net match errors is adequate. The estimate of the random errors of the ozonesonde measurements agrees well with laboratory results.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/2713/2005/acp-5-2713-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rlehmann statisticalanalysisoftheprecisionofthematchmethod
AT pvondergathen statisticalanalysisoftheprecisionofthematchmethod
AT mrex statisticalanalysisoftheprecisionofthematchmethod
AT mstreibel statisticalanalysisoftheprecisionofthematchmethod
_version_ 1725799326655971328