Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change

<p>Permafrost is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the Arctic. Its future evolution is likely to control changes in northern high-latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. J. Burke, Y. Zhang, G. Krinner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-09-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/3155/2020/tc-14-3155-2020.pdf
id doaj-4652526ced5242aeb34975b8a9272bdb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4652526ced5242aeb34975b8a9272bdb2020-11-25T03:41:20ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242020-09-01143155317410.5194/tc-14-3155-2020Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate changeE. J. Burke0Y. Zhang1G. Krinner2Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UKCanada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaInstitut des Géosciences de l'Environnement, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France<p>Permafrost is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the Arctic. Its future evolution is likely to control changes in northern high-latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous generation – CMIP5) along with the sensitivity of permafrost to climate change. Whilst the northern high-latitude air temperatures are relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air temperature. This paper shows that the climate, snow and permafrost physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main differences are that a small number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 and a small number have a deeper soil profile. These changes lead to a small overall improvement in the representation of the permafrost extent. There is little improvement in the simulation of maximum summer thaw depth between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that more models should include a better-resolved and deeper soil profile as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed volume of the top 2&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">m</span> of the soil defined from the model soil profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost dynamics. The CMIP6 models project that the annual mean frozen volume in the top 2&thinsp;m of the soil could decrease by 10&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">%</span>–40&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">%</mi><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><msup><mi/><mo>∘</mo></msup><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="1fff85a0ad5c0c31ee7cc8d065798af2"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" src="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> of global mean surface air temperature increase.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/3155/2020/tc-14-3155-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. J. Burke
Y. Zhang
G. Krinner
spellingShingle E. J. Burke
Y. Zhang
G. Krinner
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
The Cryosphere
author_facet E. J. Burke
Y. Zhang
G. Krinner
author_sort E. J. Burke
title Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_short Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_full Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_fullStr Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
title_sort evaluating permafrost physics in the coupled model intercomparison project 6 (cmip6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The Cryosphere
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
publishDate 2020-09-01
description <p>Permafrost is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the Arctic. Its future evolution is likely to control changes in northern high-latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous generation – CMIP5) along with the sensitivity of permafrost to climate change. Whilst the northern high-latitude air temperatures are relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air temperature. This paper shows that the climate, snow and permafrost physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main differences are that a small number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 and a small number have a deeper soil profile. These changes lead to a small overall improvement in the representation of the permafrost extent. There is little improvement in the simulation of maximum summer thaw depth between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that more models should include a better-resolved and deeper soil profile as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed volume of the top 2&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">m</span> of the soil defined from the model soil profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost dynamics. The CMIP6 models project that the annual mean frozen volume in the top 2&thinsp;m of the soil could decrease by 10&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">%</span>–40&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">%</mi><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><msup><mi/><mo>∘</mo></msup><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="1fff85a0ad5c0c31ee7cc8d065798af2"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" src="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> of global mean surface air temperature increase.</p>
url https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/3155/2020/tc-14-3155-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ejburke evaluatingpermafrostphysicsinthecoupledmodelintercomparisonproject6cmip6modelsandtheirsensitivitytoclimatechange
AT yzhang evaluatingpermafrostphysicsinthecoupledmodelintercomparisonproject6cmip6modelsandtheirsensitivitytoclimatechange
AT gkrinner evaluatingpermafrostphysicsinthecoupledmodelintercomparisonproject6cmip6modelsandtheirsensitivitytoclimatechange
_version_ 1724530308747886592