Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change
<p>Permafrost is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the Arctic. Its future evolution is likely to control changes in northern high-latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present g...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-09-01
|
Series: | The Cryosphere |
Online Access: | https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/3155/2020/tc-14-3155-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-4652526ced5242aeb34975b8a9272bdb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4652526ced5242aeb34975b8a9272bdb2020-11-25T03:41:20ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242020-09-01143155317410.5194/tc-14-3155-2020Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate changeE. J. Burke0Y. Zhang1G. Krinner2Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UKCanada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaInstitut des Géosciences de l'Environnement, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France<p>Permafrost is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the Arctic. Its future evolution is likely to control changes in northern high-latitude hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous generation – CMIP5) along with the sensitivity of permafrost to climate change. Whilst the northern high-latitude air temperatures are relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air temperature. This paper shows that the climate, snow and permafrost physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main differences are that a small number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 and a small number have a deeper soil profile. These changes lead to a small overall improvement in the representation of the permafrost extent. There is little improvement in the simulation of maximum summer thaw depth between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that more models should include a better-resolved and deeper soil profile as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed volume of the top 2 <span class="inline-formula">m</span> of the soil defined from the model soil profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost dynamics. The CMIP6 models project that the annual mean frozen volume in the top 2 m of the soil could decrease by 10 <span class="inline-formula">%</span>–40 <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">%</mi><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><msup><mi/><mo>∘</mo></msup><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="1fff85a0ad5c0c31ee7cc8d065798af2"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" src="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> of global mean surface air temperature increase.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/3155/2020/tc-14-3155-2020.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
E. J. Burke Y. Zhang G. Krinner |
spellingShingle |
E. J. Burke Y. Zhang G. Krinner Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change The Cryosphere |
author_facet |
E. J. Burke Y. Zhang G. Krinner |
author_sort |
E. J. Burke |
title |
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
title_short |
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
title_full |
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
title_sort |
evaluating permafrost physics in the coupled model intercomparison project 6 (cmip6) models and their sensitivity to climate change |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
The Cryosphere |
issn |
1994-0416 1994-0424 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
<p>Permafrost is a ubiquitous phenomenon in the Arctic. Its future
evolution is likely to control changes in northern high-latitude
hydrology and biogeochemistry. Here we evaluate the permafrost
dynamics in the global models participating in the Coupled Model
Intercomparison Project (present generation – CMIP6; previous
generation – CMIP5) along with the sensitivity of permafrost to
climate change. Whilst the northern high-latitude air temperatures are
relatively well simulated by the climate models, they do introduce a
bias into any subsequent model estimate of permafrost. Therefore
evaluation metrics are defined in relation to the air
temperature. This paper shows that the climate, snow and permafrost
physics of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble is very similar to that of
the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. The main differences are that a small
number of models have demonstrably better snow insulation in CMIP6
than in CMIP5 and a small number have a deeper soil profile. These
changes lead to a small overall improvement in the representation of
the permafrost extent. There is little improvement in the simulation
of maximum summer thaw depth between CMIP5 and CMIP6. We suggest that
more models should include a better-resolved and deeper soil profile
as a first step towards addressing this. We use the annual mean thawed
volume of the top 2 <span class="inline-formula">m</span> of the soil defined from the model soil
profiles for the permafrost region to quantify changes in permafrost
dynamics. The CMIP6 models project that the annual mean frozen volume
in the top 2 m of the soil could decrease by
10 <span class="inline-formula">%</span>–40 <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">%</mi><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><msup><mi/><mo>∘</mo></msup><msup><mi mathvariant="normal">C</mi><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">1</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="1fff85a0ad5c0c31ee7cc8d065798af2"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.svg" width="35pt" height="13pt" src="tc-14-3155-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> of global mean surface air
temperature increase.</p> |
url |
https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/14/3155/2020/tc-14-3155-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ejburke evaluatingpermafrostphysicsinthecoupledmodelintercomparisonproject6cmip6modelsandtheirsensitivitytoclimatechange AT yzhang evaluatingpermafrostphysicsinthecoupledmodelintercomparisonproject6cmip6modelsandtheirsensitivitytoclimatechange AT gkrinner evaluatingpermafrostphysicsinthecoupledmodelintercomparisonproject6cmip6modelsandtheirsensitivitytoclimatechange |
_version_ |
1724530308747886592 |