Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa

Adoption of mobile money technology in peripheral regions of Africa where conventional banking services are entirely lacking is very important for financial inclusion. Although the population of mobile money users has recently increased, its adoption in rural areas remains low. This study investigat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babatope E. Akinyemi, Abbyssinia Mushunje
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Cogent Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1815963
id doaj-4646180d46794a5a949f664e893d738b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4646180d46794a5a949f664e893d738b2021-08-24T15:34:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Social Sciences2331-18862020-01-016110.1080/23311886.2020.18159631815963Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of AfricaBabatope E. Akinyemi0Abbyssinia Mushunje1University of Fort HareUniversity of Fort HareAdoption of mobile money technology in peripheral regions of Africa where conventional banking services are entirely lacking is very important for financial inclusion. Although the population of mobile money users has recently increased, its adoption in rural areas remains low. This study investigates the determinants of mobile money adoption in rural areas of Africa. Data from Research ICT Africa Access Survey were analysed with the two-part model. The first part involves the adoption of mobile money; second part, how much money was sent or received using mobile money. Relative to other means of sending or receiving money, 88%, 83%, 78%, 80%, and 89% agreed that mobile money is easier, safer, more trustworthy, more convenient, and faster, respectively. Two-part model findings show that age, years of education, unemployment, and ownership of bank accounts explain both the adoption and the amount of money sent using mobile money technology. Conversely, age, bank account ownership, and net monthly income determine both the adoption of mobile money and the amount of money received using mobile money technology. We recommend that mobile money operators target rural dwellers that are young and educated with a net monthly income in their marketing strategies in order to encourage its adoption among the unbanked.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1815963adoptionafricamobile moneytechnologytwo-part model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Babatope E. Akinyemi
Abbyssinia Mushunje
spellingShingle Babatope E. Akinyemi
Abbyssinia Mushunje
Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa
Cogent Social Sciences
adoption
africa
mobile money
technology
two-part model
author_facet Babatope E. Akinyemi
Abbyssinia Mushunje
author_sort Babatope E. Akinyemi
title Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa
title_short Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa
title_full Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa
title_fullStr Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of Africa
title_sort determinants of mobile money technology adoption in rural areas of africa
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Social Sciences
issn 2331-1886
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Adoption of mobile money technology in peripheral regions of Africa where conventional banking services are entirely lacking is very important for financial inclusion. Although the population of mobile money users has recently increased, its adoption in rural areas remains low. This study investigates the determinants of mobile money adoption in rural areas of Africa. Data from Research ICT Africa Access Survey were analysed with the two-part model. The first part involves the adoption of mobile money; second part, how much money was sent or received using mobile money. Relative to other means of sending or receiving money, 88%, 83%, 78%, 80%, and 89% agreed that mobile money is easier, safer, more trustworthy, more convenient, and faster, respectively. Two-part model findings show that age, years of education, unemployment, and ownership of bank accounts explain both the adoption and the amount of money sent using mobile money technology. Conversely, age, bank account ownership, and net monthly income determine both the adoption of mobile money and the amount of money received using mobile money technology. We recommend that mobile money operators target rural dwellers that are young and educated with a net monthly income in their marketing strategies in order to encourage its adoption among the unbanked.
topic adoption
africa
mobile money
technology
two-part model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1815963
work_keys_str_mv AT babatopeeakinyemi determinantsofmobilemoneytechnologyadoptioninruralareasofafrica
AT abbyssiniamushunje determinantsofmobilemoneytechnologyadoptioninruralareasofafrica
_version_ 1721197245202694144