Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data
Abstract Background Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z |
id |
doaj-4631e70daa064592b724390ec11bafb6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4631e70daa064592b724390ec11bafb62020-11-25T02:30:10ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632020-08-0120111610.1186/s12913-020-05646-zExploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview dataRóisín O’Donovan0Eilish McAuliffe1Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College DublinCentre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, Health Sciences Centre, University College DublinAbstract Background Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of psychological safety is needed. Psychological safety concepts, including voice, silence, learning behaviour, support and familiarity, informed the current study’s investigation of psychological safety. This study aims to use a mixed-methods approach to develop an in-depth understanding of psychological safety within healthcare teams and to build on this understanding to inform the development of future interventions to improve it. Methods Survey, observational and interview data are triangulated in order to develop an in- depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams, working within one case study hospital. The teams taking part included one multidisciplinary and three unidisciplinary teams. Observational and survey data were collected during and immediately following team meetings. Individual interviews were conducted with 31 individuals across the four teams. Thematic analysis was used to analyse these interviews. Results Survey results indicated a high level of psychological safety. However, observations and interviews captured examples of silence and situations where participants felt less psychologically safe. Findings from across all three data sources are discussed in relation to voice and silence, learning, familiarity and support. Conclusion The results of this study provide a detailed description and in-depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams. Based on this, recommendations are made for future research and the development of interventions to improve psychological safety.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05646-zPsychological safetyMixed methodsHealthcare teams |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Róisín O’Donovan Eilish McAuliffe |
spellingShingle |
Róisín O’Donovan Eilish McAuliffe Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data BMC Health Services Research Psychological safety Mixed methods Healthcare teams |
author_facet |
Róisín O’Donovan Eilish McAuliffe |
author_sort |
Róisín O’Donovan |
title |
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data |
title_short |
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data |
title_full |
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data |
title_fullStr |
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data |
title_sort |
exploring psychological safety in healthcare teams to inform the development of interventions: combining observational, survey and interview data |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Psychological safety allows healthcare professionals to take the interpersonal risks needed to engage in effective teamwork and to maintain patient safety. In order to improve psychological safety in healthcare teams, an in-depth understanding of the complex and nuanced nature of psychological safety is needed. Psychological safety concepts, including voice, silence, learning behaviour, support and familiarity, informed the current study’s investigation of psychological safety. This study aims to use a mixed-methods approach to develop an in-depth understanding of psychological safety within healthcare teams and to build on this understanding to inform the development of future interventions to improve it. Methods Survey, observational and interview data are triangulated in order to develop an in- depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams, working within one case study hospital. The teams taking part included one multidisciplinary and three unidisciplinary teams. Observational and survey data were collected during and immediately following team meetings. Individual interviews were conducted with 31 individuals across the four teams. Thematic analysis was used to analyse these interviews. Results Survey results indicated a high level of psychological safety. However, observations and interviews captured examples of silence and situations where participants felt less psychologically safe. Findings from across all three data sources are discussed in relation to voice and silence, learning, familiarity and support. Conclusion The results of this study provide a detailed description and in-depth understanding of psychological safety within four healthcare teams. Based on this, recommendations are made for future research and the development of interventions to improve psychological safety. |
topic |
Psychological safety Mixed methods Healthcare teams |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-05646-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT roisinodonovan exploringpsychologicalsafetyinhealthcareteamstoinformthedevelopmentofinterventionscombiningobservationalsurveyandinterviewdata AT eilishmcauliffe exploringpsychologicalsafetyinhealthcareteamstoinformthedevelopmentofinterventionscombiningobservationalsurveyandinterviewdata |
_version_ |
1724829480107638784 |