3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.

3D printing technology offers significant advantages in the development of objects and tools across an array of fields and has been implemented in an increasing number of ecological studies. As rates of degradation or chemical leaching of 3D printed models has not been well documented under environm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily J Ruhl, Danielle L Dixson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221157
id doaj-4627fe2676234aa9bc244360920e49f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4627fe2676234aa9bc244360920e49f02021-03-03T21:22:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01148e022115710.1371/journal.pone.02211573D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.Emily J RuhlDanielle L Dixson3D printing technology offers significant advantages in the development of objects and tools across an array of fields and has been implemented in an increasing number of ecological studies. As rates of degradation or chemical leaching of 3D printed models has not been well documented under environmental conditions, it is essential to examine if these objects will alter the behavior or impact the survivorship of the focal species prior to widespread implementation. Here, we explored the efficacy of using 3D printed models in coral reef behavioral research, an area of study where this form of additive manufacturing could offer significant advantages. Coral-associated blue-green chromis (Chromis viridis) individuals were exposed to natural and 3D printed coral habitats, and larval mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) were offered 3D printed substrate as a settlement surface. Habitat association and behavioral analyses indicated that C. viridis did not discriminate or display modified behaviors between 3D printed and natural coral skeletons or between 3D printed materials. P. astreoides displayed significantly higher settlement when provided with 3D printed settlement surfaces than when provided with no settlement surface and settled at similar rates between 3D printed surfaces of differing materials. Additionally, growth and mortality of P. astreoides settled on different 3D printed surfaces did not significantly differ. Our results suggest that the 3D printed models used in this study are not inherently harmful to a coral reef fish or species of brooding coral, supporting further exploration of the benefits that these objects and others produced with additive manufacturing may offer as ecological research tools.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221157
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily J Ruhl
Danielle L Dixson
spellingShingle Emily J Ruhl
Danielle L Dixson
3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Emily J Ruhl
Danielle L Dixson
author_sort Emily J Ruhl
title 3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
title_short 3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
title_full 3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
title_fullStr 3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
title_full_unstemmed 3D printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
title_sort 3d printed objects do not impact the behavior of a coral-associated damselfish or survival of a settling stony coral.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description 3D printing technology offers significant advantages in the development of objects and tools across an array of fields and has been implemented in an increasing number of ecological studies. As rates of degradation or chemical leaching of 3D printed models has not been well documented under environmental conditions, it is essential to examine if these objects will alter the behavior or impact the survivorship of the focal species prior to widespread implementation. Here, we explored the efficacy of using 3D printed models in coral reef behavioral research, an area of study where this form of additive manufacturing could offer significant advantages. Coral-associated blue-green chromis (Chromis viridis) individuals were exposed to natural and 3D printed coral habitats, and larval mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) were offered 3D printed substrate as a settlement surface. Habitat association and behavioral analyses indicated that C. viridis did not discriminate or display modified behaviors between 3D printed and natural coral skeletons or between 3D printed materials. P. astreoides displayed significantly higher settlement when provided with 3D printed settlement surfaces than when provided with no settlement surface and settled at similar rates between 3D printed surfaces of differing materials. Additionally, growth and mortality of P. astreoides settled on different 3D printed surfaces did not significantly differ. Our results suggest that the 3D printed models used in this study are not inherently harmful to a coral reef fish or species of brooding coral, supporting further exploration of the benefits that these objects and others produced with additive manufacturing may offer as ecological research tools.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221157
work_keys_str_mv AT emilyjruhl 3dprintedobjectsdonotimpactthebehaviorofacoralassociateddamselfishorsurvivalofasettlingstonycoral
AT danielleldixson 3dprintedobjectsdonotimpactthebehaviorofacoralassociateddamselfishorsurvivalofasettlingstonycoral
_version_ 1714817202889162752