Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record

<strong>Objective</strong> We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. <strong>Methods</strong> A pre- and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Wrobel, William Chagares, Rodney Stuck, Frances Weaver, Ryan Crews, Lauren Rapacki, Rhonda Paulson, David Armstrong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2010-12-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/783
id doaj-460970a138254ebfa804ad0e56d89664
record_format Article
spelling doaj-460970a138254ebfa804ad0e56d896642020-11-25T01:02:52ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632010-12-0118428328710.14236/jhi.v18i4.783725Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical recordJames WrobelWilliam ChagaresRodney StuckFrances WeaverRyan CrewsLauren RapackiRhonda PaulsonDavid Armstrong<strong>Objective</strong> We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. <strong>Methods</strong> A pre- and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk and clinician acceptability. The intervention hospital's reminder was replaced with a dialogue tick box containing the International Diabetic Foot Classification System to populate risk using health factors. <strong>Results</strong> There were no hospital agreement differences for each foot condition except diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, demonstrating higher agreement at the intervention hospital. There were no differences in service agreement adherence or consulting rates although both demonstrated significantly lower consulting rates at study end. The intervention hospital had a significantly lower patient cancellation rate (1% v. 5%, P=0.01) and better coding for grade 3 patients. The new reminder demonstrated high acceptability. <strong>Conclusions</strong> The registry system resulted in improved discrimination of the highest foot risk. Further testing is recommended.http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/783amputationamputation preventiondiabetesdiabetic footelectronic medical recordpatient care planningquality improvementregistriesreproducibility of resultsvalidation studies
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Wrobel
William Chagares
Rodney Stuck
Frances Weaver
Ryan Crews
Lauren Rapacki
Rhonda Paulson
David Armstrong
spellingShingle James Wrobel
William Chagares
Rodney Stuck
Frances Weaver
Ryan Crews
Lauren Rapacki
Rhonda Paulson
David Armstrong
Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
amputation
amputation prevention
diabetes
diabetic foot
electronic medical record
patient care planning
quality improvement
registries
reproducibility of results
validation studies
author_facet James Wrobel
William Chagares
Rodney Stuck
Frances Weaver
Ryan Crews
Lauren Rapacki
Rhonda Paulson
David Armstrong
author_sort James Wrobel
title Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
title_short Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
title_full Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
title_fullStr Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
title_full_unstemmed Creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
title_sort creating a diabetes foot reminder-based registry using the electronic medical record
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
publishDate 2010-12-01
description <strong>Objective</strong> We created a new diabetes foot examination clinical reminder to directly populate a foot risk registry and examined its accuracy versus administrative data. <strong>Methods</strong> A pre- and post-test design assessed accuracy of coding foot risk and clinician acceptability. The intervention hospital's reminder was replaced with a dialogue tick box containing the International Diabetic Foot Classification System to populate risk using health factors. <strong>Results</strong> There were no hospital agreement differences for each foot condition except diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, demonstrating higher agreement at the intervention hospital. There were no differences in service agreement adherence or consulting rates although both demonstrated significantly lower consulting rates at study end. The intervention hospital had a significantly lower patient cancellation rate (1% v. 5%, P=0.01) and better coding for grade 3 patients. The new reminder demonstrated high acceptability. <strong>Conclusions</strong> The registry system resulted in improved discrimination of the highest foot risk. Further testing is recommended.
topic amputation
amputation prevention
diabetes
diabetic foot
electronic medical record
patient care planning
quality improvement
registries
reproducibility of results
validation studies
url http://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/783
work_keys_str_mv AT jameswrobel creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT williamchagares creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT rodneystuck creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT francesweaver creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT ryancrews creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT laurenrapacki creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT rhondapaulson creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
AT davidarmstrong creatingadiabetesfootreminderbasedregistryusingtheelectronicmedicalrecord
_version_ 1725203223867817984