Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results
Numerical simulation is used to predict the behavior and response of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP). Sometimes zero thickness of interface layer is introduced into the numerical model to investigate the inter-layer behavior like delamination. To investigate the influence of critical volume-t...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2016-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166706083 |
id |
doaj-46010fd2f55c47eabcbc1cfbcdab5e81 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-46010fd2f55c47eabcbc1cfbcdab5e812021-02-02T08:58:54ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2016-01-01670608310.1051/matecconf/20166706083matecconf_smae2016_06083Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation ResultsLiu Xueshu0Huang Li1Xu Maoqing2Zhang Zhipeng3School of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of TechnologySchool of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of TechnologySchool of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of TechnologySchool of Automotive Engineering, Dalian University of TechnologyNumerical simulation is used to predict the behavior and response of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP). Sometimes zero thickness of interface layer is introduced into the numerical model to investigate the inter-layer behavior like delamination. To investigate the influence of critical volume-type defect like void, usually appeared in matrix rich region at the interface between layers, on mechanical properties of CFRP, numerical models with different interface thickness were created and tensile property and three-point bending simulation results were compared to experimental ones. It is found that accurate result is obtained with increasing of the interface thickness and up to 20% that of layer thickness is recommended to model the matrix rich region.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166706083 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Liu Xueshu Huang Li Xu Maoqing Zhang Zhipeng |
spellingShingle |
Liu Xueshu Huang Li Xu Maoqing Zhang Zhipeng Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Liu Xueshu Huang Li Xu Maoqing Zhang Zhipeng |
author_sort |
Liu Xueshu |
title |
Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results |
title_short |
Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results |
title_full |
Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results |
title_fullStr |
Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of Different Modeling Strategies for CFRP on Finite Element Simulation Results |
title_sort |
influence of different modeling strategies for cfrp on finite element simulation results |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Numerical simulation is used to predict the behavior and response of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP). Sometimes zero thickness of interface layer is introduced into the numerical model to investigate the inter-layer behavior like delamination. To investigate the influence of critical volume-type defect like void, usually appeared in matrix rich region at the interface between layers, on mechanical properties of CFRP, numerical models with different interface thickness were created and tensile property and three-point bending simulation results were compared to experimental ones. It is found that accurate result is obtained with increasing of the interface thickness and up to 20% that of layer thickness is recommended to model the matrix rich region. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166706083 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liuxueshu influenceofdifferentmodelingstrategiesforcfrponfiniteelementsimulationresults AT huangli influenceofdifferentmodelingstrategiesforcfrponfiniteelementsimulationresults AT xumaoqing influenceofdifferentmodelingstrategiesforcfrponfiniteelementsimulationresults AT zhangzhipeng influenceofdifferentmodelingstrategiesforcfrponfiniteelementsimulationresults |
_version_ |
1724295875976495104 |