Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action

Collective action is a fundamental feature of human social life. If public goods are to materialize, social norms are to emerge, and social protests are to succeed, individuals must act jointly to achieve their collective ends. But how can collective action evolve when individuals receive the benefi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blaine G. Robbins, Ross L. Matsueda, Steven J. Pfaff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-12-01
Series:Socius
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120977722
id doaj-45e71289be0f4ca3b886b71e155549f8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-45e71289be0f4ca3b886b71e155549f82021-04-02T20:22:34ZengSAGE PublishingSocius2378-02312020-12-01610.1177/2378023120977722Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective ActionBlaine G. Robbins0Ross L. Matsueda1Steven J. Pfaff2New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USAUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USACollective action is a fundamental feature of human social life. If public goods are to materialize, social norms are to emerge, and social protests are to succeed, individuals must act jointly to achieve their collective ends. But how can collective action evolve when individuals receive the benefits of a common good without contributing to its production? According to theories of the critical mass, the success of collective action hinges on the type of production function required for the provision of a common good. Production functions and mobilization functions, however, have proven difficult to observe empirically in large groups. Here, the authors report results from a factorial survey experiment administered to a disproportionate stratified random sample of undergraduate students ( n = 880) that required respondents to rate their perceptions of and intentions to participate in a hypothetical student protest. Results show that the population-average production and mobilization functions are decelerating, but individual heterogeneity is observed around the population averages. Moreover, the experiment demonstrates that latent class trajectories of production and mobilization functions, rather than population-level consensus or complete individual heterogeneity, exist in the population. The authors show that the majority of latent class trajectories are decelerating, while a minority are linear or relatively constant. The authors find that subjective interest in the common good and attitudes toward protest predict membership in latent class trajectories. Importantly, the authors provide evidence for the predictive validity of their estimates. The authors discuss the implications of these results for theories of the critical mass and for promoting collective action.https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120977722
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Blaine G. Robbins
Ross L. Matsueda
Steven J. Pfaff
spellingShingle Blaine G. Robbins
Ross L. Matsueda
Steven J. Pfaff
Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action
Socius
author_facet Blaine G. Robbins
Ross L. Matsueda
Steven J. Pfaff
author_sort Blaine G. Robbins
title Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action
title_short Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action
title_full Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action
title_fullStr Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the Production and Mobilization Functions of Collective Action
title_sort mapping the production and mobilization functions of collective action
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Socius
issn 2378-0231
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Collective action is a fundamental feature of human social life. If public goods are to materialize, social norms are to emerge, and social protests are to succeed, individuals must act jointly to achieve their collective ends. But how can collective action evolve when individuals receive the benefits of a common good without contributing to its production? According to theories of the critical mass, the success of collective action hinges on the type of production function required for the provision of a common good. Production functions and mobilization functions, however, have proven difficult to observe empirically in large groups. Here, the authors report results from a factorial survey experiment administered to a disproportionate stratified random sample of undergraduate students ( n = 880) that required respondents to rate their perceptions of and intentions to participate in a hypothetical student protest. Results show that the population-average production and mobilization functions are decelerating, but individual heterogeneity is observed around the population averages. Moreover, the experiment demonstrates that latent class trajectories of production and mobilization functions, rather than population-level consensus or complete individual heterogeneity, exist in the population. The authors show that the majority of latent class trajectories are decelerating, while a minority are linear or relatively constant. The authors find that subjective interest in the common good and attitudes toward protest predict membership in latent class trajectories. Importantly, the authors provide evidence for the predictive validity of their estimates. The authors discuss the implications of these results for theories of the critical mass and for promoting collective action.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120977722
work_keys_str_mv AT blainegrobbins mappingtheproductionandmobilizationfunctionsofcollectiveaction
AT rosslmatsueda mappingtheproductionandmobilizationfunctionsofcollectiveaction
AT stevenjpfaff mappingtheproductionandmobilizationfunctionsofcollectiveaction
_version_ 1721547444634779648