Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?

The classification of agricultural producers by legal-organizational form (agricultural enterprises, peasant (family farms), household plots and gardening associations), traditionally used by the Russian official statistics, is outdated and masks the dynamic changes that have taken p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renata Yanbykh, Valeriy Saraikin, Zvi Lerman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Voprosy Ekonomiki 2020-03-01
Series:Russian Journal of Economics
Online Access:https://rujec.org/article/49746/download/pdf/
id doaj-45da2dc76d8a4294a27823e36ea82231
record_format Article
spelling doaj-45da2dc76d8a4294a27823e36ea822312020-11-25T02:31:43ZengVoprosy EkonomikiRussian Journal of Economics2405-47392020-03-0161264110.32609/j.ruje.6.4974649746Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?Renata Yanbykh0Valeriy Saraikin1Zvi Lerman2HSE UniversityHSE UniversityThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem The classification of agricultural producers by legal-organizational form (agricultural enterprises, peasant (family farms), household plots and gardening associations), traditionally used by the Russian official statistics, is outdated and masks the dynamic changes that have taken place. Due to the lack of output and sales data in 2016 agricultural census, the paper uses some assumptions to calculate the so called “standard revenue” as a measure of the potential output in each census farm. The results highlight that there is only a small share of commercial production units in Russia and there is high heterogeneity of agricultural producers within each legal-organizational farm type. Contrary to a priori expectations, a large number of household plots became commercialized between the previous census in 2006 and the latest census in 2016 and they contribute 19% of the standard revenue of all commercial census units, more than the share of family farms. These results suggest that the old classification used for statistical purposes does not reflect adequately the dynamic changes stemming from the response to market signals. https://rujec.org/article/49746/download/pdf/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renata Yanbykh
Valeriy Saraikin
Zvi Lerman
spellingShingle Renata Yanbykh
Valeriy Saraikin
Zvi Lerman
Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?
Russian Journal of Economics
author_facet Renata Yanbykh
Valeriy Saraikin
Zvi Lerman
author_sort Renata Yanbykh
title Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?
title_short Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?
title_full Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?
title_fullStr Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?
title_full_unstemmed Changes in Russia’s agrarian structure: What can we learn from agricultural census?
title_sort changes in russia’s agrarian structure: what can we learn from agricultural census?
publisher Voprosy Ekonomiki
series Russian Journal of Economics
issn 2405-4739
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The classification of agricultural producers by legal-organizational form (agricultural enterprises, peasant (family farms), household plots and gardening associations), traditionally used by the Russian official statistics, is outdated and masks the dynamic changes that have taken place. Due to the lack of output and sales data in 2016 agricultural census, the paper uses some assumptions to calculate the so called “standard revenue” as a measure of the potential output in each census farm. The results highlight that there is only a small share of commercial production units in Russia and there is high heterogeneity of agricultural producers within each legal-organizational farm type. Contrary to a priori expectations, a large number of household plots became commercialized between the previous census in 2006 and the latest census in 2016 and they contribute 19% of the standard revenue of all commercial census units, more than the share of family farms. These results suggest that the old classification used for statistical purposes does not reflect adequately the dynamic changes stemming from the response to market signals.
url https://rujec.org/article/49746/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT renatayanbykh changesinrussiasagrarianstructurewhatcanwelearnfromagriculturalcensus
AT valeriysaraikin changesinrussiasagrarianstructurewhatcanwelearnfromagriculturalcensus
AT zvilerman changesinrussiasagrarianstructurewhatcanwelearnfromagriculturalcensus
_version_ 1724822492754739200