Genotyping problems of microorganisms

Genotyping efficiency depends on resolution of methods which provided by the target sequence of genome, efficiency of enzymes, primers and conditions of DNA restriction and PCR amplification. The most differential tools are methods involving the high evolutionary markers. They are methods MST, MLVA,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. A. Volkova, E. S. Skolotneva, E. V. Elbert, E. D. Mytsa, D. S. Davydov, A. A. Movsesyants, V. A. Merkulov, V. P. Bondarev, I. V. Borisevich
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Federal State Budgetary Institution «Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products» 2018-02-01
Series:Биопрепараты: Профилактика, диагностика, лечение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.biopreparations.ru/jour/article/view/56
id doaj-45a34f2a30914646a745266cc6aea06f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-45a34f2a30914646a745266cc6aea06f2021-07-28T14:03:34ZrusMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation. Federal State Budgetary Institution «Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products» Биопрепараты: Профилактика, диагностика, лечение2221-996X2619-11562018-02-0116313914456Genotyping problems of microorganismsR. A. Volkova0E. S. Skolotneva1E. V. Elbert2E. D. Mytsa3D. S. Davydov4A. A. Movsesyants5V. A. Merkulov6V. P. Bondarev7I. V. Borisevich8Scientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsMoscow Lomonosov State University, Biological facultyScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsScientific Center for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal ProductsGenotyping efficiency depends on resolution of methods which provided by the target sequence of genome, efficiency of enzymes, primers and conditions of DNA restriction and PCR amplification. The most differential tools are methods involving the high evolutionary markers. They are methods MST, MLVA, DGE, HRM against to the method MLST based on the slow evolutionary marker. Methods PFGE, AFLP, DNA chips exploit the preliminary information of genome and have the better resolution than ribotyping and RFLP-PCR limited by certain loci. Monitoring of local outbreaks may be carried out using a rapidly evolving markers (methods RAPD-PCR, MST, or MLVA, DGE, HRM). The most suitable methods for prolongated epidemiological or population researches are MLST, PFGE, ribotyping and pyrosequencing analysis. Polymicrobial samples are investigated with DNA specific methods PCR-RFLP, MLVA, DGE, HRM, MLST, MST, DNA chips. The metagenomic analysis is the most informative to identify the species of bacterium from the polymicrobial sample. It is essential to use the conservative DNA sequences, for example 16S rRNA. The modern genotyping assays provide the informative and technological platform for phylogenetic studies of bacterial strains even through the several generations. The important results are figures of genetic distances between strains involving in complex of epidemiological characteristics: virulence, antibiotic resistance and the others. The computing tools for integration the phenotyping and sequencing data have developed. Whole-genome sequencing is the optimal method for bacterial genotyping. But there are several crucial restrictions of this method. It is still rather expensive and needs to operate with high quality DNA.https://www.biopreparations.ru/jour/article/view/56генотипированиемикроорганизмымолекулярно-генетические методыgenotypingmicroorganismsmolecular-genetic methods
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. A. Volkova
E. S. Skolotneva
E. V. Elbert
E. D. Mytsa
D. S. Davydov
A. A. Movsesyants
V. A. Merkulov
V. P. Bondarev
I. V. Borisevich
spellingShingle R. A. Volkova
E. S. Skolotneva
E. V. Elbert
E. D. Mytsa
D. S. Davydov
A. A. Movsesyants
V. A. Merkulov
V. P. Bondarev
I. V. Borisevich
Genotyping problems of microorganisms
Биопрепараты: Профилактика, диагностика, лечение
генотипирование
микроорганизмы
молекулярно-генетические методы
genotyping
microorganisms
molecular-genetic methods
author_facet R. A. Volkova
E. S. Skolotneva
E. V. Elbert
E. D. Mytsa
D. S. Davydov
A. A. Movsesyants
V. A. Merkulov
V. P. Bondarev
I. V. Borisevich
author_sort R. A. Volkova
title Genotyping problems of microorganisms
title_short Genotyping problems of microorganisms
title_full Genotyping problems of microorganisms
title_fullStr Genotyping problems of microorganisms
title_full_unstemmed Genotyping problems of microorganisms
title_sort genotyping problems of microorganisms
publisher Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Federal State Budgetary Institution «Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products»
series Биопрепараты: Профилактика, диагностика, лечение
issn 2221-996X
2619-1156
publishDate 2018-02-01
description Genotyping efficiency depends on resolution of methods which provided by the target sequence of genome, efficiency of enzymes, primers and conditions of DNA restriction and PCR amplification. The most differential tools are methods involving the high evolutionary markers. They are methods MST, MLVA, DGE, HRM against to the method MLST based on the slow evolutionary marker. Methods PFGE, AFLP, DNA chips exploit the preliminary information of genome and have the better resolution than ribotyping and RFLP-PCR limited by certain loci. Monitoring of local outbreaks may be carried out using a rapidly evolving markers (methods RAPD-PCR, MST, or MLVA, DGE, HRM). The most suitable methods for prolongated epidemiological or population researches are MLST, PFGE, ribotyping and pyrosequencing analysis. Polymicrobial samples are investigated with DNA specific methods PCR-RFLP, MLVA, DGE, HRM, MLST, MST, DNA chips. The metagenomic analysis is the most informative to identify the species of bacterium from the polymicrobial sample. It is essential to use the conservative DNA sequences, for example 16S rRNA. The modern genotyping assays provide the informative and technological platform for phylogenetic studies of bacterial strains even through the several generations. The important results are figures of genetic distances between strains involving in complex of epidemiological characteristics: virulence, antibiotic resistance and the others. The computing tools for integration the phenotyping and sequencing data have developed. Whole-genome sequencing is the optimal method for bacterial genotyping. But there are several crucial restrictions of this method. It is still rather expensive and needs to operate with high quality DNA.
topic генотипирование
микроорганизмы
молекулярно-генетические методы
genotyping
microorganisms
molecular-genetic methods
url https://www.biopreparations.ru/jour/article/view/56
work_keys_str_mv AT ravolkova genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT esskolotneva genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT evelbert genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT edmytsa genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT dsdavydov genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT aamovsesyants genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT vamerkulov genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT vpbondarev genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
AT ivborisevich genotypingproblemsofmicroorganisms
_version_ 1721268687497854976