A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of two different age groups (children and young adult) to learning of temporal-special coordination hand movement pattern. Materials and Methods: Sixty subjects according to the age (children-young adult) and receiving feedback (10...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mehdi Roozbahani, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi, Hassan Khalaji
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Vesnu Publications 2012-09-01
Series:مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی
Online Access:http://jrrs.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrrs/article/view/447
id doaj-45a2cb0c2e7c4ccebde5895eb93a6f62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-45a2cb0c2e7c4ccebde5895eb93a6f622020-11-24T20:43:10ZfasVesnu Publications مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی1735-75192008-26062012-09-018467168310.22122/jrrs.v8i4.447309A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitationMehdi Roozbahani0Seyed Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi1Hassan Khalaji2Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Academic Member and Member of Young Researchers club Borujerd, Islamic Azad University, Borujerd, IranProfessor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Imam Hossein University, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Arak University, Arak, IranIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of two different age groups (children and young adult) to learning of temporal-special coordination hand movement pattern. Materials and Methods: Sixty subjects according to the age (children-young adult) and receiving feedback (100%, omitted, self-control) were randomly divided in to six groups. This study was done in three days. All subjects practice 100 trails of movement task in each day of first and second days. Retention tests were done in second and third days and reacquisition test was done in the third day. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures and two way ANOVA was used to data analysis. Results: All participants in the first day improved their accuracy across practice trials. In the second day children did not improve their accuracy but young adult experienced improvement across practice trials. There was no significant difference between retention children tests but that was significant about young adult. During the retention tests children who received 100% feedback was significantly better than other children feedback groups and there was no significant between young adult feedback groups. During the reacquisition test children who received 100% feedback was significantly better than other children feedback groups and there was no significant between young adult feedback groups. Conclusion: Results from this study showed young adult were better than children in the learning of this pattern, receiving more feedback can improve motor learning in children (in contrast with guidance hypothesis) and we must not expect motor skill acquisition occur in fast rate like young adult in children. Keywords: Age, Young adult, Children, Motor learning, Feedbackhttp://jrrs.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrrs/article/view/447
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mehdi Roozbahani
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi
Hassan Khalaji
spellingShingle Mehdi Roozbahani
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi
Hassan Khalaji
A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی
author_facet Mehdi Roozbahani
Seyed Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi
Hassan Khalaji
author_sort Mehdi Roozbahani
title A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
title_short A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
title_full A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
title_fullStr A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
title_sort comparison of learning a hand movement pattern in 20 to 26 young adults and 8-10 years old children and its application in rehabilitation
publisher Vesnu Publications
series مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی
issn 1735-7519
2008-2606
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of two different age groups (children and young adult) to learning of temporal-special coordination hand movement pattern. Materials and Methods: Sixty subjects according to the age (children-young adult) and receiving feedback (100%, omitted, self-control) were randomly divided in to six groups. This study was done in three days. All subjects practice 100 trails of movement task in each day of first and second days. Retention tests were done in second and third days and reacquisition test was done in the third day. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures and two way ANOVA was used to data analysis. Results: All participants in the first day improved their accuracy across practice trials. In the second day children did not improve their accuracy but young adult experienced improvement across practice trials. There was no significant difference between retention children tests but that was significant about young adult. During the retention tests children who received 100% feedback was significantly better than other children feedback groups and there was no significant between young adult feedback groups. During the reacquisition test children who received 100% feedback was significantly better than other children feedback groups and there was no significant between young adult feedback groups. Conclusion: Results from this study showed young adult were better than children in the learning of this pattern, receiving more feedback can improve motor learning in children (in contrast with guidance hypothesis) and we must not expect motor skill acquisition occur in fast rate like young adult in children. Keywords: Age, Young adult, Children, Motor learning, Feedback
url http://jrrs.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jrrs/article/view/447
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdiroozbahani acomparisonoflearningahandmovementpatternin20to26youngadultsand810yearsoldchildrenanditsapplicationinrehabilitation
AT seyedmohammadkazemvaezmousavi acomparisonoflearningahandmovementpatternin20to26youngadultsand810yearsoldchildrenanditsapplicationinrehabilitation
AT hassankhalaji acomparisonoflearningahandmovementpatternin20to26youngadultsand810yearsoldchildrenanditsapplicationinrehabilitation
AT mehdiroozbahani comparisonoflearningahandmovementpatternin20to26youngadultsand810yearsoldchildrenanditsapplicationinrehabilitation
AT seyedmohammadkazemvaezmousavi comparisonoflearningahandmovementpatternin20to26youngadultsand810yearsoldchildrenanditsapplicationinrehabilitation
AT hassankhalaji comparisonoflearningahandmovementpatternin20to26youngadultsand810yearsoldchildrenanditsapplicationinrehabilitation
_version_ 1716820350580293632