HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK

This paper focuses on the development and growth of standard-led reform and regulation of TVET teachers and trainers in the UK by developing a theoretical discussion and critique of standards that has a wider relevance to that in other countries. It shows how standards-led regulation in the UK has m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norman Lucas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press 2012-05-01
Series:International Journal of Education
Online Access:http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ije/article/view/5297
id doaj-459ebc7f8b2f4c9fae797cc9543fe33f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-459ebc7f8b2f4c9fae797cc9543fe33f2020-11-24T23:50:16ZengUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia PressInternational Journal of Education1978-13422442-47302012-05-016211412810.17509/ije.v6i2.52973966HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UKNorman Lucas0Institute of Education, University of LondonThis paper focuses on the development and growth of standard-led reform and regulation of TVET teachers and trainers in the UK by developing a theoretical discussion and critique of standards that has a wider relevance to that in other countries. It shows how standards-led regulation in the UK has moved from a permissive to a more rigid approach where new standards have been defined. The study also illustrates how standards are mediated and interpreted differently within the diverse contexts and communities of practice by developing a critique of the standards-led model, an attempt to codify both situated and non-situated knowledge. Here, standards are treated as decontextualised, vertical knowledge simply applicable across diverse contexts, subjects/vocational practices, learning in the workplace and training TVET teachers. Within the diverse practices of TVET teachers and teacher educators, different types of understandings exist and different types of knowledge and pedagogy are learnt, used and transformed. Not only do attempts to deal with the complex zone of professional practice by standards fail to address the inherent ambiguity of standards, but also lead to a bureaucratic, competency-based framework which marginalizes professional knowledge and understanding.   Keywords: TVET teachers and trainers, standard-led reform and regulation, professional knowledgehttp://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ije/article/view/5297
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Norman Lucas
spellingShingle Norman Lucas
HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK
International Journal of Education
author_facet Norman Lucas
author_sort Norman Lucas
title HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK
title_short HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK
title_full HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK
title_fullStr HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK
title_full_unstemmed HOW STANDARDS ‘TRAVEL AND CHANGE BETWEEN CONTEXTS: NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR TVET TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE UK
title_sort how standards ‘travel and change between contexts: national standards for tvet teacher education in the uk
publisher Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press
series International Journal of Education
issn 1978-1342
2442-4730
publishDate 2012-05-01
description This paper focuses on the development and growth of standard-led reform and regulation of TVET teachers and trainers in the UK by developing a theoretical discussion and critique of standards that has a wider relevance to that in other countries. It shows how standards-led regulation in the UK has moved from a permissive to a more rigid approach where new standards have been defined. The study also illustrates how standards are mediated and interpreted differently within the diverse contexts and communities of practice by developing a critique of the standards-led model, an attempt to codify both situated and non-situated knowledge. Here, standards are treated as decontextualised, vertical knowledge simply applicable across diverse contexts, subjects/vocational practices, learning in the workplace and training TVET teachers. Within the diverse practices of TVET teachers and teacher educators, different types of understandings exist and different types of knowledge and pedagogy are learnt, used and transformed. Not only do attempts to deal with the complex zone of professional practice by standards fail to address the inherent ambiguity of standards, but also lead to a bureaucratic, competency-based framework which marginalizes professional knowledge and understanding.   Keywords: TVET teachers and trainers, standard-led reform and regulation, professional knowledge
url http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ije/article/view/5297
work_keys_str_mv AT normanlucas howstandardstravelandchangebetweencontextsnationalstandardsfortvetteachereducationintheuk
_version_ 1725479462528614400