The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?

This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pasvenskienė Aušrinė, Astromskis Paulius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-06-01
Series:Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008
id doaj-4586ab715b9b4b8e9362d2d25a781616
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4586ab715b9b4b8e9362d2d25a7816162021-09-05T21:00:29ZengSciendoBaltic Journal of Law & Politics2029-04542020-06-0113119121710.2478/bjlp-2020-0008bjlp-2020-0008The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?Pasvenskienė Aušrinė0Astromskis Paulius1Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Law (Lithuania)Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Law (Lithuania)This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens of the International Labor Organization Centenary Declaration, followed by an analysis of the right to education, leading to the formation of a theoretical justification of the legal duty to adapt the legal education curriculum to a technology-driven future. This article exposes the existing state of the legal education curriculum with a systematic analysis of the existing Law & Tech master’s programs at leading universities worldwide. This research demonstrates that relatively few (9.8%) leading world universities offer specialized Law & Tech master’s programs. This clear underdevelopment of the Law & Tech curriculum suggests that deeply embedded conservatism in legal education might be violating the rights of future lawyers – the right to work and the right to education, in particular.https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008right to workright to educationlegal educationlegaltech
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pasvenskienė Aušrinė
Astromskis Paulius
spellingShingle Pasvenskienė Aušrinė
Astromskis Paulius
The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
right to work
right to education
legal education
legaltech
author_facet Pasvenskienė Aušrinė
Astromskis Paulius
author_sort Pasvenskienė Aušrinė
title The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
title_short The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
title_full The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
title_fullStr The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
title_full_unstemmed The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
title_sort future of legal education: do law schools have the right to be conservative?
publisher Sciendo
series Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
issn 2029-0454
publishDate 2020-06-01
description This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens of the International Labor Organization Centenary Declaration, followed by an analysis of the right to education, leading to the formation of a theoretical justification of the legal duty to adapt the legal education curriculum to a technology-driven future. This article exposes the existing state of the legal education curriculum with a systematic analysis of the existing Law & Tech master’s programs at leading universities worldwide. This research demonstrates that relatively few (9.8%) leading world universities offer specialized Law & Tech master’s programs. This clear underdevelopment of the Law & Tech curriculum suggests that deeply embedded conservatism in legal education might be violating the rights of future lawyers – the right to work and the right to education, in particular.
topic right to work
right to education
legal education
legaltech
url https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT pasvenskieneausrine thefutureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative
AT astromskispaulius thefutureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative
AT pasvenskieneausrine futureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative
AT astromskispaulius futureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative
_version_ 1717782850809364480