The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?
This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens o...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Baltic Journal of Law & Politics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008 |
id |
doaj-4586ab715b9b4b8e9362d2d25a781616 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4586ab715b9b4b8e9362d2d25a7816162021-09-05T21:00:29ZengSciendoBaltic Journal of Law & Politics2029-04542020-06-0113119121710.2478/bjlp-2020-0008bjlp-2020-0008The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative?Pasvenskienė Aušrinė0Astromskis Paulius1Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Law (Lithuania)Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Law (Lithuania)This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens of the International Labor Organization Centenary Declaration, followed by an analysis of the right to education, leading to the formation of a theoretical justification of the legal duty to adapt the legal education curriculum to a technology-driven future. This article exposes the existing state of the legal education curriculum with a systematic analysis of the existing Law & Tech master’s programs at leading universities worldwide. This research demonstrates that relatively few (9.8%) leading world universities offer specialized Law & Tech master’s programs. This clear underdevelopment of the Law & Tech curriculum suggests that deeply embedded conservatism in legal education might be violating the rights of future lawyers – the right to work and the right to education, in particular.https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008right to workright to educationlegal educationlegaltech |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pasvenskienė Aušrinė Astromskis Paulius |
spellingShingle |
Pasvenskienė Aušrinė Astromskis Paulius The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative? Baltic Journal of Law & Politics right to work right to education legal education legaltech |
author_facet |
Pasvenskienė Aušrinė Astromskis Paulius |
author_sort |
Pasvenskienė Aušrinė |
title |
The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative? |
title_short |
The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative? |
title_full |
The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative? |
title_fullStr |
The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Future of Legal Education: Do Law Schools Have the Right to Be Conservative? |
title_sort |
future of legal education: do law schools have the right to be conservative? |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Baltic Journal of Law & Politics |
issn |
2029-0454 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
This article explores how emerging technologies should shape legal studies, recognizing that the new technological era requires a new generation of tech-savvy lawyers who possess specific technology-related skills and knowledge. The article builds on analysis of the future of work through the lens of the International Labor Organization Centenary Declaration, followed by an analysis of the right to education, leading to the formation of a theoretical justification of the legal duty to adapt the legal education curriculum to a technology-driven future. This article exposes the existing state of the legal education curriculum with a systematic analysis of the existing Law & Tech master’s programs at leading universities worldwide. This research demonstrates that relatively few (9.8%) leading world universities offer specialized Law & Tech master’s programs. This clear underdevelopment of the Law & Tech curriculum suggests that deeply embedded conservatism in legal education might be violating the rights of future lawyers – the right to work and the right to education, in particular. |
topic |
right to work right to education legal education legaltech |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2020-0008 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pasvenskieneausrine thefutureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative AT astromskispaulius thefutureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative AT pasvenskieneausrine futureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative AT astromskispaulius futureoflegaleducationdolawschoolshavetherighttobeconservative |
_version_ |
1717782850809364480 |