Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers

Let’s be realistic, counter-trafficking teams will never be as effective as the proactive and flexible networks of outlaws that violate the rights of millions of people each year. The ‘bad guys’ operate without the same financial limitations such as bureaucratic red tape and donor criteria, and take...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vincent Tournecuillert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women 2014-09-01
Series:Anti-Trafficking Review
Online Access:http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/71
id doaj-457c7f9f44e9434aa6933505f375adc2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-457c7f9f44e9434aa6933505f375adc22020-11-24T22:34:28ZengGlobal Alliance Against Traffic in WomenAnti-Trafficking Review2286-75112287-01132014-09-01310.14197/atr.20121431071Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to TraffickersVincent TournecuillertLet’s be realistic, counter-trafficking teams will never be as effective as the proactive and flexible networks of outlaws that violate the rights of millions of people each year. The ‘bad guys’ operate without the same financial limitations such as bureaucratic red tape and donor criteria, and take advantage of patchy and often uncoordinated border surveillance that is chronically untrained in detecting trafficking in persons.  Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) involved in the fight against human trafficking—and in direct contact with presumed victims (their status is not assessed until at a stage later than this initial contact)—are in a diametrically opposite situation. They must carefully abide by the national and international legal frameworks that their criminal antagonists ignore. Donors and national authorities operate within the constraints of geographic target areas and funding cycles. Since counter-trafficking actors neither create the markets nor devise the routes for trafficking, their strategic cross-border (or long distance) partnerships are always a few steps behind the traffickers, if not many steps behind, and rarely efficient.http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/71
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vincent Tournecuillert
spellingShingle Vincent Tournecuillert
Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers
Anti-Trafficking Review
author_facet Vincent Tournecuillert
author_sort Vincent Tournecuillert
title Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers
title_short Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers
title_full Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers
title_fullStr Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers
title_full_unstemmed Debate: Strategically Working in Parallel to Traffickers
title_sort debate: strategically working in parallel to traffickers
publisher Global Alliance Against Traffic in Women
series Anti-Trafficking Review
issn 2286-7511
2287-0113
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Let’s be realistic, counter-trafficking teams will never be as effective as the proactive and flexible networks of outlaws that violate the rights of millions of people each year. The ‘bad guys’ operate without the same financial limitations such as bureaucratic red tape and donor criteria, and take advantage of patchy and often uncoordinated border surveillance that is chronically untrained in detecting trafficking in persons.  Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) involved in the fight against human trafficking—and in direct contact with presumed victims (their status is not assessed until at a stage later than this initial contact)—are in a diametrically opposite situation. They must carefully abide by the national and international legal frameworks that their criminal antagonists ignore. Donors and national authorities operate within the constraints of geographic target areas and funding cycles. Since counter-trafficking actors neither create the markets nor devise the routes for trafficking, their strategic cross-border (or long distance) partnerships are always a few steps behind the traffickers, if not many steps behind, and rarely efficient.
url http://www.antitraffickingreview.org/index.php/atrjournal/article/view/71
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenttournecuillert debatestrategicallyworkinginparalleltotraffickers
_version_ 1725727301062098944