COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)

In the field of archaeological surveying, remote sensors and especially photogrammetric and laser scanner systems are widely used to create 3D models. The use of photogrammetric surveying with UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), combined with Computer Vision algorithms, allows the building of three-dim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Barba, M. Barbarella, A. Di Benedetto, M. Fiani, M. Limongiello
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-05-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2-W11/179/2019/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-179-2019.pdf
id doaj-4565d20112204977b4e9d6d7e9c8e678
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4565d20112204977b4e9d6d7e9c8e6782020-11-25T01:02:31ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342019-05-01XLII-2-W1117918610.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-179-2019COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)S. Barba0M. Barbarella1A. Di Benedetto2M. Fiani3M. Limongiello4Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano (SA), ItalyDepartment of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano (SA), ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano (SA), ItalyDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano (SA), ItalyIn the field of archaeological surveying, remote sensors and especially photogrammetric and laser scanner systems are widely used to create 3D models. The use of photogrammetric surveying with UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), combined with Computer Vision algorithms, allows the building of three-dimensional models, characterized by photo-realistic textures. The choice of which method to use mainly depends on the complexity of the investigated site, the accuracy requirements and the available budget and time. The different components of the UAV system determine its characteristics in terms of performance and accuracy, therefore define its quality and the cost too. This study presents an assessment of the accuracy of point clouds derived by two UAV systems, a commercial quadcopter (DJI Phantom 3 Professional), a professional assembled hexacopter, and by a TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanner) in order to compare photogrammetric and laser scanner data for archaeological applications. In this paper, we present a case study to compare and analyse the metric accuracy of the point clouds and the distribution of the GCPs (Ground Control Points). This accuracy assessment will serve to quantify the uncertainty in the absolute position of the GCPs, identified on the panoramic images in the absence of artificial targets. Executed experiments showed that in tested UAVs, the choice of the GCPs has significant impact on point cloud accuracy. Estimated absolute accuracy of point clouds collected during both test flights was better than 5 cm.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2-W11/179/2019/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-179-2019.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Barba
M. Barbarella
A. Di Benedetto
M. Fiani
M. Limongiello
spellingShingle S. Barba
M. Barbarella
A. Di Benedetto
M. Fiani
M. Limongiello
COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
author_facet S. Barba
M. Barbarella
A. Di Benedetto
M. Fiani
M. Limongiello
author_sort S. Barba
title COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)
title_short COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)
title_full COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF UAVS PERFORMANCE FOR A ROMAN AMPHITHEATRE SURVEY: THE CASE OF AVELLA (ITALY)
title_sort comparison of uavs performance for a roman amphitheatre survey: the case of avella (italy)
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
publishDate 2019-05-01
description In the field of archaeological surveying, remote sensors and especially photogrammetric and laser scanner systems are widely used to create 3D models. The use of photogrammetric surveying with UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), combined with Computer Vision algorithms, allows the building of three-dimensional models, characterized by photo-realistic textures. The choice of which method to use mainly depends on the complexity of the investigated site, the accuracy requirements and the available budget and time. The different components of the UAV system determine its characteristics in terms of performance and accuracy, therefore define its quality and the cost too. This study presents an assessment of the accuracy of point clouds derived by two UAV systems, a commercial quadcopter (DJI Phantom 3 Professional), a professional assembled hexacopter, and by a TLS (Terrestrial Laser Scanner) in order to compare photogrammetric and laser scanner data for archaeological applications. In this paper, we present a case study to compare and analyse the metric accuracy of the point clouds and the distribution of the GCPs (Ground Control Points). This accuracy assessment will serve to quantify the uncertainty in the absolute position of the GCPs, identified on the panoramic images in the absence of artificial targets. Executed experiments showed that in tested UAVs, the choice of the GCPs has significant impact on point cloud accuracy. Estimated absolute accuracy of point clouds collected during both test flights was better than 5 cm.
url https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-2-W11/179/2019/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-179-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sbarba comparisonofuavsperformanceforaromanamphitheatresurveythecaseofavellaitaly
AT mbarbarella comparisonofuavsperformanceforaromanamphitheatresurveythecaseofavellaitaly
AT adibenedetto comparisonofuavsperformanceforaromanamphitheatresurveythecaseofavellaitaly
AT mfiani comparisonofuavsperformanceforaromanamphitheatresurveythecaseofavellaitaly
AT mlimongiello comparisonofuavsperformanceforaromanamphitheatresurveythecaseofavellaitaly
_version_ 1725204419058860032