Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
This paper presents the proposed criteria for measuring the quality and completeness of field spectroscopy metadata in a spectral archive. Definitions for metadata quality and completeness for field spectroscopy datasets are introduced. Unique methods for measuring quality and completeness of metada...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/4/4499 |
id |
doaj-456307986ba143e4a03d62f7b29ee7d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-456307986ba143e4a03d62f7b29ee7d12020-11-24T22:02:00ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922015-04-01744499452610.3390/rs70404499rs70404499Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata QualityBarbara A. Rasaiah0Simon. D. Jones1Chris Bellman2Tim J. Malthus3Andreas Hueni4Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaRemote Sensing and Photogrammetry Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaRemote Sensing and Photogrammetry Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaCSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaRemote Sensing Laboratories, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, SwitzerlandThis paper presents the proposed criteria for measuring the quality and completeness of field spectroscopy metadata in a spectral archive. Definitions for metadata quality and completeness for field spectroscopy datasets are introduced. Unique methods for measuring quality and completeness of metadata to meet the requirements of field spectroscopy datasets are presented. Field spectroscopy metadata quality can be defined in terms of (but is not limited to) logical consistency, lineage, semantic and syntactic error rates, compliance with a quality standard, quality assurance by a recognized authority, and reputational authority of the data owners/data creators. Two spectral libraries are examined as case studies of operationalized metadata policies, and the degree to which they are aligned with the needs of field spectroscopy scientists. The case studies reveal that the metadata in publicly available spectral datasets are underperforming on the quality and completeness measures. This paper is part two in a series examining the issues central to a metadata standard for field spectroscopy datasets.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/4/4499metadatadatabasesdata qualityfield spectroscopy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Barbara A. Rasaiah Simon. D. Jones Chris Bellman Tim J. Malthus Andreas Hueni |
spellingShingle |
Barbara A. Rasaiah Simon. D. Jones Chris Bellman Tim J. Malthus Andreas Hueni Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality Remote Sensing metadata databases data quality field spectroscopy |
author_facet |
Barbara A. Rasaiah Simon. D. Jones Chris Bellman Tim J. Malthus Andreas Hueni |
author_sort |
Barbara A. Rasaiah |
title |
Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality |
title_short |
Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality |
title_full |
Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality |
title_fullStr |
Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality |
title_sort |
assessing field spectroscopy metadata quality |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
This paper presents the proposed criteria for measuring the quality and completeness of field spectroscopy metadata in a spectral archive. Definitions for metadata quality and completeness for field spectroscopy datasets are introduced. Unique methods for measuring quality and completeness of metadata to meet the requirements of field spectroscopy datasets are presented. Field spectroscopy metadata quality can be defined in terms of (but is not limited to) logical consistency, lineage, semantic and syntactic error rates, compliance with a quality standard, quality assurance by a recognized authority, and reputational authority of the data owners/data creators. Two spectral libraries are examined as case studies of operationalized metadata policies, and the degree to which they are aligned with the needs of field spectroscopy scientists. The case studies reveal that the metadata in publicly available spectral datasets are underperforming on the quality and completeness measures. This paper is part two in a series examining the issues central to a metadata standard for field spectroscopy datasets. |
topic |
metadata databases data quality field spectroscopy |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/4/4499 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT barbaraarasaiah assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality AT simondjones assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality AT chrisbellman assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality AT timjmalthus assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality AT andreashueni assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality |
_version_ |
1725837411104063488 |