Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality

This paper presents the proposed criteria for measuring the quality and completeness of field spectroscopy metadata in a spectral archive. Definitions for metadata quality and completeness for field spectroscopy datasets are introduced. Unique methods for measuring quality and completeness of metada...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara A. Rasaiah, Simon. D. Jones, Chris Bellman, Tim J. Malthus, Andreas Hueni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-04-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/4/4499
id doaj-456307986ba143e4a03d62f7b29ee7d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-456307986ba143e4a03d62f7b29ee7d12020-11-24T22:02:00ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922015-04-01744499452610.3390/rs70404499rs70404499Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata QualityBarbara A. Rasaiah0Simon. D. Jones1Chris Bellman2Tim J. Malthus3Andreas Hueni4Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaRemote Sensing and Photogrammetry Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaRemote Sensing and Photogrammetry Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, AustraliaCSIRO Land and Water, Canberra, ACT 2601, AustraliaRemote Sensing Laboratories, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, SwitzerlandThis paper presents the proposed criteria for measuring the quality and completeness of field spectroscopy metadata in a spectral archive. Definitions for metadata quality and completeness for field spectroscopy datasets are introduced. Unique methods for measuring quality and completeness of metadata to meet the requirements of field spectroscopy datasets are presented. Field spectroscopy metadata quality can be defined in terms of (but is not limited to) logical consistency, lineage, semantic and syntactic error rates, compliance with a quality standard, quality assurance by a recognized authority, and reputational authority of the data owners/data creators. Two spectral libraries are examined as case studies of operationalized metadata policies, and the degree to which they are aligned with the needs of field spectroscopy scientists. The case studies reveal that the metadata in publicly available spectral datasets are underperforming on the quality and completeness measures. This paper is part two in a series examining the issues central to a metadata standard for field spectroscopy datasets.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/4/4499metadatadatabasesdata qualityfield spectroscopy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barbara A. Rasaiah
Simon. D. Jones
Chris Bellman
Tim J. Malthus
Andreas Hueni
spellingShingle Barbara A. Rasaiah
Simon. D. Jones
Chris Bellman
Tim J. Malthus
Andreas Hueni
Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
Remote Sensing
metadata
databases
data quality
field spectroscopy
author_facet Barbara A. Rasaiah
Simon. D. Jones
Chris Bellman
Tim J. Malthus
Andreas Hueni
author_sort Barbara A. Rasaiah
title Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
title_short Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
title_full Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
title_fullStr Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Field Spectroscopy Metadata Quality
title_sort assessing field spectroscopy metadata quality
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2015-04-01
description This paper presents the proposed criteria for measuring the quality and completeness of field spectroscopy metadata in a spectral archive. Definitions for metadata quality and completeness for field spectroscopy datasets are introduced. Unique methods for measuring quality and completeness of metadata to meet the requirements of field spectroscopy datasets are presented. Field spectroscopy metadata quality can be defined in terms of (but is not limited to) logical consistency, lineage, semantic and syntactic error rates, compliance with a quality standard, quality assurance by a recognized authority, and reputational authority of the data owners/data creators. Two spectral libraries are examined as case studies of operationalized metadata policies, and the degree to which they are aligned with the needs of field spectroscopy scientists. The case studies reveal that the metadata in publicly available spectral datasets are underperforming on the quality and completeness measures. This paper is part two in a series examining the issues central to a metadata standard for field spectroscopy datasets.
topic metadata
databases
data quality
field spectroscopy
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/7/4/4499
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaraarasaiah assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality
AT simondjones assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality
AT chrisbellman assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality
AT timjmalthus assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality
AT andreashueni assessingfieldspectroscopymetadataquality
_version_ 1725837411104063488