Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites

Background and Aim : Determining the best restorative material to decrease microleakage in class V restorations is of great importance in operative dentistry. The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of silorane-based composites compared to low shrinkage methacrylate-based com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamid Kermanshah, Esmaeil Yassini, Raziyeh Hoseinifar, Mansoreh Mirzaei, Ayub Pahlavan, Masomeh Hasani Tabatabaie, Sakineh Arami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2013-07-01
Series:Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-692&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-453dab6a2c064783b3379f512a816e61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-453dab6a2c064783b3379f512a816e612020-11-25T01:18:25ZengIslamic Dental Association of IranJournal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran2383-30412383-30412013-07-01253147154Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based CompositesHamid Kermanshah0Esmaeil Yassini1Raziyeh Hoseinifar2Mansoreh Mirzaei3Ayub Pahlavan4Masomeh Hasani Tabatabaie5Sakineh Arami6 Member of Dental Research Center and Laser Research and Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science. Tehran, Iran Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science. Tehran, Iran Member of Dental Diseases Research Center and Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Science. Kerman, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science. Tehran, Iran Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science. Tehran, Iran Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science. Tehran, Iran Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Science. Tehran, Iran Background and Aim : Determining the best restorative material to decrease microleakage in class V restorations is of great importance in operative dentistry. The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of silorane-based composites compared to low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites in class V restorations.   Materials and Methods : In this in vitro study, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 24 human premolars and molars (48 cavities). The specimens were divided into four groups of 6(12 cavities) as follows: group 1 ( LS System Adhesive, Primer & Bond + Filtek P90), group 2 ( Kalore-GC+ Clearfil SE bond ), group 3 ( Clearfil SE bond + Grandio) and group4 ( Clearfil SE bond + Aelite LS Posterior) . All the specimens were thermocycled for 2000 cycles (5-50oC).   The teeth were then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours at 370C, sectioned and observed under stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests at a P<0.05 level of significance .   Results : There were no significant differences in microleakage among the four groups at the occlusal margin (P>0.05). But, there were statistically significant differences in microleakage between Silorane and Aelite at the gingival margin (P<0.05).   Statistically significant differences were also found in microleakage between occlusal and gingival margins (except for Kalore and Silorane) (P>0.05 )   Conclusion : Silorane was not superior to the conventional low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites except for Aelite in terms of microleakage .http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-692&slc_lang=en&sid=1Composite resinsmethacrylatemicroleakage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hamid Kermanshah
Esmaeil Yassini
Raziyeh Hoseinifar
Mansoreh Mirzaei
Ayub Pahlavan
Masomeh Hasani Tabatabaie
Sakineh Arami
spellingShingle Hamid Kermanshah
Esmaeil Yassini
Raziyeh Hoseinifar
Mansoreh Mirzaei
Ayub Pahlavan
Masomeh Hasani Tabatabaie
Sakineh Arami
Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran
Composite resins
methacrylate
microleakage
author_facet Hamid Kermanshah
Esmaeil Yassini
Raziyeh Hoseinifar
Mansoreh Mirzaei
Ayub Pahlavan
Masomeh Hasani Tabatabaie
Sakineh Arami
author_sort Hamid Kermanshah
title Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
title_short Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
title_full Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
title_fullStr Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage Evaluation of Silorane-Based Composites Versus Low Shirinkage Methacrylate-Based Composites
title_sort microleakage evaluation of silorane-based composites versus low shirinkage methacrylate-based composites
publisher Islamic Dental Association of Iran
series Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran
issn 2383-3041
2383-3041
publishDate 2013-07-01
description Background and Aim : Determining the best restorative material to decrease microleakage in class V restorations is of great importance in operative dentistry. The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the microleakage of silorane-based composites compared to low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites in class V restorations.   Materials and Methods : In this in vitro study, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 24 human premolars and molars (48 cavities). The specimens were divided into four groups of 6(12 cavities) as follows: group 1 ( LS System Adhesive, Primer & Bond + Filtek P90), group 2 ( Kalore-GC+ Clearfil SE bond ), group 3 ( Clearfil SE bond + Grandio) and group4 ( Clearfil SE bond + Aelite LS Posterior) . All the specimens were thermocycled for 2000 cycles (5-50oC).   The teeth were then immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours at 370C, sectioned and observed under stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests at a P<0.05 level of significance .   Results : There were no significant differences in microleakage among the four groups at the occlusal margin (P>0.05). But, there were statistically significant differences in microleakage between Silorane and Aelite at the gingival margin (P<0.05).   Statistically significant differences were also found in microleakage between occlusal and gingival margins (except for Kalore and Silorane) (P>0.05 )   Conclusion : Silorane was not superior to the conventional low shrinkage methacrylate-based composites except for Aelite in terms of microleakage .
topic Composite resins
methacrylate
microleakage
url http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-692&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidkermanshah microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
AT esmaeilyassini microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
AT raziyehhoseinifar microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
AT mansorehmirzaei microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
AT ayubpahlavan microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
AT masomehhasanitabatabaie microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
AT sakineharami microleakageevaluationofsiloranebasedcompositesversuslowshirinkagemethacrylatebasedcomposites
_version_ 1725142658132738048