Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°

High intensity beams may suffer from serious beam quality degradation if the focusing scheme allows for occurrence of resonances or instabilities. For transverse focusing a commonly accepted and respected lattice design rule is to choose the phase advance per structure period below the 90° resonant...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Rubin, L. Groening, I. Hofmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2020-12-01
Series:Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.124202
id doaj-452157d3a8984ac287d9267140f48a56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-452157d3a8984ac287d9267140f48a562021-02-11T23:55:17ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Accelerators and Beams2469-98882020-12-01231212420210.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.124202Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°A. RubinL. GroeningI. HofmannHigh intensity beams may suffer from serious beam quality degradation if the focusing scheme allows for occurrence of resonances or instabilities. For transverse focusing a commonly accepted and respected lattice design rule is to choose the phase advance per structure period below the 90° resonant stop band, which was implicitly applied to the longitudinal phase advance the same way. A recent study pointed out that for lattice structures with more than one rf gap per period the 90° restriction needs not to be applied the same way to the longitudinal focusing as to the transverse one [I. Hofmann and Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 114803 (2017)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.118.114803], thus offering more design flexibility. The present paper is motivated by an interest to accelerate intense proton beams above longitudinal 90° in the new poststripper drift tube linac of the GSI universal linear accelerator by using the rf power supplies optimized for the much stiffer heavy ions. We confirm that a strictly periodic prolongation of the first cavity could allow acceleration above longitudinal 90° with only minor beam quality degradation. However, the combination of a high longitudinal phase advance with intercavity sections breaking the periodicity shows that matching challenges—rather than resonances—determine emittance growth. In the present case it is found tolerable for up to three such sections. This confirms the validity of the principle and at the same time its limits under practical conditions.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.124202
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Rubin
L. Groening
I. Hofmann
spellingShingle A. Rubin
L. Groening
I. Hofmann
Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
author_facet A. Rubin
L. Groening
I. Hofmann
author_sort A. Rubin
title Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
title_short Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
title_full Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
title_fullStr Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
title_full_unstemmed Simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
title_sort simulation study of a high-intensity linear accelerator operated at longitudinal phase advances above 90°
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
issn 2469-9888
publishDate 2020-12-01
description High intensity beams may suffer from serious beam quality degradation if the focusing scheme allows for occurrence of resonances or instabilities. For transverse focusing a commonly accepted and respected lattice design rule is to choose the phase advance per structure period below the 90° resonant stop band, which was implicitly applied to the longitudinal phase advance the same way. A recent study pointed out that for lattice structures with more than one rf gap per period the 90° restriction needs not to be applied the same way to the longitudinal focusing as to the transverse one [I. Hofmann and Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 114803 (2017)PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.118.114803], thus offering more design flexibility. The present paper is motivated by an interest to accelerate intense proton beams above longitudinal 90° in the new poststripper drift tube linac of the GSI universal linear accelerator by using the rf power supplies optimized for the much stiffer heavy ions. We confirm that a strictly periodic prolongation of the first cavity could allow acceleration above longitudinal 90° with only minor beam quality degradation. However, the combination of a high longitudinal phase advance with intercavity sections breaking the periodicity shows that matching challenges—rather than resonances—determine emittance growth. In the present case it is found tolerable for up to three such sections. This confirms the validity of the principle and at the same time its limits under practical conditions.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.124202
work_keys_str_mv AT arubin simulationstudyofahighintensitylinearacceleratoroperatedatlongitudinalphaseadvancesabove90
AT lgroening simulationstudyofahighintensitylinearacceleratoroperatedatlongitudinalphaseadvancesabove90
AT ihofmann simulationstudyofahighintensitylinearacceleratoroperatedatlongitudinalphaseadvancesabove90
_version_ 1724274014320328704