A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family

The analyses were performed on a right third premolar (P<sub>3</sub>) of a white rhinoceros female (<i>Ceratotherium</i><i> </i><i>simum</i>, Burchell 1817). The specimen was born in captivity at London Zoo (Zoological Society of London), then in the 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edyta Pasicka, Dariusz Nowakowski, Robin Bendrey, Oleg P. Melnyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/910
id doaj-4520d185a90040adb38235e042b66304
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4520d185a90040adb38235e042b663042021-03-23T00:06:01ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-03-011191091010.3390/ani11030910A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae FamilyEdyta Pasicka0Dariusz Nowakowski1Robin Bendrey2Oleg P. Melnyk3Archaeozoology Laboratory and Museum of Standards, Division of Animal Anatomy, Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 1/3, 51-631 Wrocław, PolandDepartment of Anthropology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kożuchowska 5, 51-631 Wrocław, PolandSchool of History, Classics and Archaeology, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UKDepartment of Animal Anatomy, Histology and Pathomorphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Potekhin 16, 03041 Kyiv, UkraineThe analyses were performed on a right third premolar (P<sub>3</sub>) of a white rhinoceros female (<i>Ceratotherium</i><i> </i><i>simum</i>, Burchell 1817). The specimen was born in captivity at London Zoo (Zoological Society of London), then in the 1970s transferred to Kiev Zoo (Peremohy Avenue), Ukraine, and was kept there until it died at a documented chronological age of 48 years. The female died because of its age, which indicates it was kept in good conditions adequate to the requirements of this species. Photographs and micrographs with radiological documentation were taken on the said tooth. Its structural characteristics were determined, and on the occlusal surface areas and points of anatomical constitution of its crown were identified. The tooth was also histologically evaluated via sections taken horizontally in a mesial-distal plane through the crown, horizontally in a mesial-distal plane through the coronal portion of the root, and longitudinally in a lingual-buccal plane through the crown and the root. Preparations with ground sections were made and observed in white, polarized, and reflected light. In the subsequent stage X-ray and SEM imaging has also been used, for analysis of the distribution of annual growth layers of mineralized dental tissues of cement and dentine, counted from the root canal center to the buccal surface. An attempt was also made to confirm the annual season in which the animal died, based on cement growth lines. It was observed that the growth lines were visible in all the analyzed sections, in dentine and cement. In the cement, the lines were relatively few and did not represent the attested age of the animal. The analysis of the coloration of the cement lines indicated that the animal was regularly fed a diet that was not seasonally differentiated. From the X-ray examination comes a conclusion that the animal did not suffer from periodontal diseases. Visible growth lines were observed on the dentine. On the horizontal section through the crown growth lines in the dentine were few and unclear. On the longitudinal section, both on the caudal and rostral roots, these lines were clearly visible and much more numerous than expected considering the known age of the animal, as more than 50 were counted. On horizontal sections through the upper part of both roots, distinct growth lines were observed in the dentine, and their number—48 for both roots—corresponded precisely to the age of the animal. The results of our study indicate that this method has significant potential for application to verify the age at death for modern and fossil representatives of rhinoceros.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/910age estimationdentitioncementdentinelight microscope (LM)scanning electron microscope (SEM)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edyta Pasicka
Dariusz Nowakowski
Robin Bendrey
Oleg P. Melnyk
spellingShingle Edyta Pasicka
Dariusz Nowakowski
Robin Bendrey
Oleg P. Melnyk
A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family
Animals
age estimation
dentition
cement
dentine
light microscope (LM)
scanning electron microscope (SEM)
author_facet Edyta Pasicka
Dariusz Nowakowski
Robin Bendrey
Oleg P. Melnyk
author_sort Edyta Pasicka
title A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family
title_short A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family
title_full A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family
title_fullStr A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family
title_full_unstemmed A Model for Dental Age Verification Using Ultrastructural Imaging for Modern and Fossil Representatives of the Rhinocerotidae Family
title_sort model for dental age verification using ultrastructural imaging for modern and fossil representatives of the rhinocerotidae family
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The analyses were performed on a right third premolar (P<sub>3</sub>) of a white rhinoceros female (<i>Ceratotherium</i><i> </i><i>simum</i>, Burchell 1817). The specimen was born in captivity at London Zoo (Zoological Society of London), then in the 1970s transferred to Kiev Zoo (Peremohy Avenue), Ukraine, and was kept there until it died at a documented chronological age of 48 years. The female died because of its age, which indicates it was kept in good conditions adequate to the requirements of this species. Photographs and micrographs with radiological documentation were taken on the said tooth. Its structural characteristics were determined, and on the occlusal surface areas and points of anatomical constitution of its crown were identified. The tooth was also histologically evaluated via sections taken horizontally in a mesial-distal plane through the crown, horizontally in a mesial-distal plane through the coronal portion of the root, and longitudinally in a lingual-buccal plane through the crown and the root. Preparations with ground sections were made and observed in white, polarized, and reflected light. In the subsequent stage X-ray and SEM imaging has also been used, for analysis of the distribution of annual growth layers of mineralized dental tissues of cement and dentine, counted from the root canal center to the buccal surface. An attempt was also made to confirm the annual season in which the animal died, based on cement growth lines. It was observed that the growth lines were visible in all the analyzed sections, in dentine and cement. In the cement, the lines were relatively few and did not represent the attested age of the animal. The analysis of the coloration of the cement lines indicated that the animal was regularly fed a diet that was not seasonally differentiated. From the X-ray examination comes a conclusion that the animal did not suffer from periodontal diseases. Visible growth lines were observed on the dentine. On the horizontal section through the crown growth lines in the dentine were few and unclear. On the longitudinal section, both on the caudal and rostral roots, these lines were clearly visible and much more numerous than expected considering the known age of the animal, as more than 50 were counted. On horizontal sections through the upper part of both roots, distinct growth lines were observed in the dentine, and their number—48 for both roots—corresponded precisely to the age of the animal. The results of our study indicate that this method has significant potential for application to verify the age at death for modern and fossil representatives of rhinoceros.
topic age estimation
dentition
cement
dentine
light microscope (LM)
scanning electron microscope (SEM)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/910
work_keys_str_mv AT edytapasicka amodelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT dariusznowakowski amodelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT robinbendrey amodelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT olegpmelnyk amodelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT edytapasicka modelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT dariusznowakowski modelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT robinbendrey modelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
AT olegpmelnyk modelfordentalageverificationusingultrastructuralimagingformodernandfossilrepresentativesoftherhinocerotidaefamily
_version_ 1724206891165286400