What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Encouraging men to make more effective use of (preventive) health services is considered one way of improving their health. The aim of this study was to appraise the available evidence of effective interventions aimed at improving me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reid Garth, Ludbrook Anne, Douglas Flora, Robertson Lynn M, van Teijlingen Edwin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/141
id doaj-4506d99dac424cde9736bf1541f463b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4506d99dac424cde9736bf1541f463b22020-11-24T23:57:48ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632008-07-018114110.1186/1472-6963-8-141What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting menReid GarthLudbrook AnneDouglas FloraRobertson Lynn Mvan Teijlingen Edwin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Encouraging men to make more effective use of (preventive) health services is considered one way of improving their health. The aim of this study was to appraise the available evidence of effective interventions aimed at improving men's health.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Systematic review of relevant studies identified through 14 electronic databases and other information resources. Results were pooled within health topic and described qualitatively.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 11,749 citations screened, 338 articles were assessed and 27 met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were male sex-specific, i.e. prostate cancer screening and testicular self-examination. Other topics included alcohol, cardiovascular disease, diet and physical activity, skin cancer and smoking cessation. Twenty-three interventions were effective or partially effective and 18 studies satisfied all quality criteria.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Most of the existing evidence relates to male sex-specific health problems as opposed to general health concerns relevant to both men and women. There is little published evidence on how to improve men's uptake of services. We cannot conclude from this review that targeting men works better than providing services for all people. Large-scale studies are required to help produce evidence that is sufficiently robust to add to the small evidence base that currently exists in this field.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/141
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Reid Garth
Ludbrook Anne
Douglas Flora
Robertson Lynn M
van Teijlingen Edwin
spellingShingle Reid Garth
Ludbrook Anne
Douglas Flora
Robertson Lynn M
van Teijlingen Edwin
What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Reid Garth
Ludbrook Anne
Douglas Flora
Robertson Lynn M
van Teijlingen Edwin
author_sort Reid Garth
title What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
title_short What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
title_full What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
title_fullStr What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
title_full_unstemmed What works with men? A systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
title_sort what works with men? a systematic review of health promoting interventions targeting men
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2008-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Encouraging men to make more effective use of (preventive) health services is considered one way of improving their health. The aim of this study was to appraise the available evidence of effective interventions aimed at improving men's health.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Systematic review of relevant studies identified through 14 electronic databases and other information resources. Results were pooled within health topic and described qualitatively.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 11,749 citations screened, 338 articles were assessed and 27 met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were male sex-specific, i.e. prostate cancer screening and testicular self-examination. Other topics included alcohol, cardiovascular disease, diet and physical activity, skin cancer and smoking cessation. Twenty-three interventions were effective or partially effective and 18 studies satisfied all quality criteria.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Most of the existing evidence relates to male sex-specific health problems as opposed to general health concerns relevant to both men and women. There is little published evidence on how to improve men's uptake of services. We cannot conclude from this review that targeting men works better than providing services for all people. Large-scale studies are required to help produce evidence that is sufficiently robust to add to the small evidence base that currently exists in this field.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/8/141
work_keys_str_mv AT reidgarth whatworkswithmenasystematicreviewofhealthpromotinginterventionstargetingmen
AT ludbrookanne whatworkswithmenasystematicreviewofhealthpromotinginterventionstargetingmen
AT douglasflora whatworkswithmenasystematicreviewofhealthpromotinginterventionstargetingmen
AT robertsonlynnm whatworkswithmenasystematicreviewofhealthpromotinginterventionstargetingmen
AT vanteijlingenedwin whatworkswithmenasystematicreviewofhealthpromotinginterventionstargetingmen
_version_ 1725453167956590592