Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?

This paper investigates the relationship between corporate social and environmental performance and financial performance for a sample of publicly traded US real estate companies. Using the MSCI ESG (formerly KLD) database on seven Environmental, Social & Governance dimensions in the 2003–2010...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcelo Cajias, Franz Fuerst, Patrick McAllister, Anupam Nanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2014-03-01
Series:International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/3443
id doaj-4504244bcdd347539c3685a5bade9d90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4504244bcdd347539c3685a5bade9d902021-07-02T02:04:20ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management1648-715X1648-91792014-03-0118110.3846/1648715X.2013.866601Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?Marcelo Cajias0Franz Fuerst1Patrick McAllister2Anupam Nanda3University of Regensburg, IREBS Competence Center of Sustainable Real Estate, Gebäude PT, Raum 50.0.05, D-93053 Regensburg, GermanyUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EP, UKBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Wates House, 22 Gordon Street, WC1H OQBUniversity of Reading, Real Estate & Planning, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 5UD United Kingdom This paper investigates the relationship between corporate social and environmental performance and financial performance for a sample of publicly traded US real estate companies. Using the MSCI ESG (formerly KLD) database on seven Environmental, Social & Governance dimensions in the 2003–2010 period, and weighting the dimensions according to prominence in the real estate sector, we model Tobin's Q and annual total return in a panel data framework. The results indicate a positive relationship between ESG rating and Tobin's Q but this effect is driven by ESG concerns rather than strengths. Consistently across all model specifications, overall ESG ratings are associated with lower returns. Negative scores appear to result in higher returns, at least in the short run, but positive scores have no significant impact on returns. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/3443Corporate social responsibilityReal estatePanel data
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcelo Cajias
Franz Fuerst
Patrick McAllister
Anupam Nanda
spellingShingle Marcelo Cajias
Franz Fuerst
Patrick McAllister
Anupam Nanda
Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
International Journal of Strategic Property Management
Corporate social responsibility
Real estate
Panel data
author_facet Marcelo Cajias
Franz Fuerst
Patrick McAllister
Anupam Nanda
author_sort Marcelo Cajias
title Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
title_short Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
title_full Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
title_fullStr Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
title_full_unstemmed Do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
title_sort do responsible real estate companies outperform their peers?
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
series International Journal of Strategic Property Management
issn 1648-715X
1648-9179
publishDate 2014-03-01
description This paper investigates the relationship between corporate social and environmental performance and financial performance for a sample of publicly traded US real estate companies. Using the MSCI ESG (formerly KLD) database on seven Environmental, Social & Governance dimensions in the 2003–2010 period, and weighting the dimensions according to prominence in the real estate sector, we model Tobin's Q and annual total return in a panel data framework. The results indicate a positive relationship between ESG rating and Tobin's Q but this effect is driven by ESG concerns rather than strengths. Consistently across all model specifications, overall ESG ratings are associated with lower returns. Negative scores appear to result in higher returns, at least in the short run, but positive scores have no significant impact on returns.
topic Corporate social responsibility
Real estate
Panel data
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/IJSPM/article/view/3443
work_keys_str_mv AT marcelocajias doresponsiblerealestatecompaniesoutperformtheirpeers
AT franzfuerst doresponsiblerealestatecompaniesoutperformtheirpeers
AT patrickmcallister doresponsiblerealestatecompaniesoutperformtheirpeers
AT anupamnanda doresponsiblerealestatecompaniesoutperformtheirpeers
_version_ 1721343929046007808