Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer
Background and study aims Durable biliary drainage is essential during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic cancer who present with biliary obstruction. Plastic stents (PS) tend to occlude readily, resulting in delay/interruption of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0599-6190 |
id |
doaj-45005873804241b0bbf5c97f778285c0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-45005873804241b0bbf5c97f778285c02020-11-25T02:50:39ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362018-05-010606E714E72110.1055/a-0599-6190Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancerDarren D. Ballard0Syed Rahman1Brian Ginnebaugh2Abdul Khan3Kulwinder S. Dua4Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, U.S.A.Background and study aims Durable biliary drainage is essential during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic cancer who present with biliary obstruction. Plastic stents (PS) tend to occlude readily, resulting in delay/interruption of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for biliary drainage in patients receiving NAT for pancreatic cancer. Patients and methods From 2009 to 2014, all consecutive patients with resectable pancreatic cancer at one tertiary center had SEMS placed for biliary drainage before NAT was started. Data on biliary drainage efficacy, stent malfunction rates and procedural adverse events were collected. Results One hundred forty-two consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer (mean age 66 ± 9 SD years; 81 male, 61 female; 67 resectable, 75 borderline resectable) were enrolled. Eight-seven patients (61 %) had prior PS exchanged to SEMS and 55 (39 %) had SEMS placed upfront. Median duration from SEMS placement to the end of NAT/surgery was 111 days (range 44 – 282). During NAT, SEMS malfunction requiring reintervention occurred in 16 patients (11.2 %): tissue ingrowth 11, stent occlusion from food 6, stent migration 3, incomplete expansion 1, “tissue cheese-cutter” effect 1, and cystic duct obstruction 1. On subgroup analysis, no correlation between SEMS malfunction and stage of disease, prior PS, or duration of NAT was found (r2 = 0.05, P = 0.34). Presence of SEMS in situ did not affect pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusion SEMS provide safe, effective and durable biliary drainage during NAT for pancreas cancer. Previously placed PS can be exchanged for SEMS. SEMS do not require removal prior to surgery. Meeting presentations: Digestive Disease Week 2015 and 2017http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0599-6190 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Darren D. Ballard Syed Rahman Brian Ginnebaugh Abdul Khan Kulwinder S. Dua |
spellingShingle |
Darren D. Ballard Syed Rahman Brian Ginnebaugh Abdul Khan Kulwinder S. Dua Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer Endoscopy International Open |
author_facet |
Darren D. Ballard Syed Rahman Brian Ginnebaugh Abdul Khan Kulwinder S. Dua |
author_sort |
Darren D. Ballard |
title |
Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer |
title_short |
Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer |
title_full |
Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer |
title_fullStr |
Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer |
title_sort |
safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents for biliary drainage in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
series |
Endoscopy International Open |
issn |
2364-3722 2196-9736 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
Background and study aims Durable biliary drainage is essential during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with pancreatic cancer who present with biliary obstruction. Plastic stents (PS) tend to occlude readily, resulting in delay/interruption of treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for biliary drainage in patients receiving NAT for pancreatic cancer.
Patients and methods From 2009 to 2014, all consecutive patients with resectable pancreatic cancer at one tertiary center had SEMS placed for biliary drainage before NAT was started. Data on biliary drainage efficacy, stent malfunction rates and procedural adverse events were collected.
Results One hundred forty-two consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer (mean age 66 ± 9 SD years; 81 male, 61 female; 67 resectable, 75 borderline resectable) were enrolled. Eight-seven patients (61 %) had prior PS exchanged to SEMS and 55 (39 %) had SEMS placed upfront. Median duration from SEMS placement to the end of NAT/surgery was 111 days (range 44 – 282). During NAT, SEMS malfunction requiring reintervention occurred in 16 patients (11.2 %): tissue ingrowth 11, stent occlusion from food 6, stent migration 3, incomplete expansion 1, “tissue cheese-cutter” effect 1, and cystic duct obstruction 1. On subgroup analysis, no correlation between SEMS malfunction and stage of disease, prior PS, or duration of NAT was found (r2 = 0.05, P = 0.34). Presence of SEMS in situ did not affect pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Conclusion SEMS provide safe, effective and durable biliary drainage during NAT for pancreas cancer. Previously placed PS can be exchanged for SEMS. SEMS do not require removal prior to surgery. Meeting presentations: Digestive Disease Week 2015 and 2017 |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0599-6190 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT darrendballard safetyandefficacyofselfexpandingmetalstentsforbiliarydrainageinpatientsreceivingneoadjuvanttherapyforpancreaticcancer AT syedrahman safetyandefficacyofselfexpandingmetalstentsforbiliarydrainageinpatientsreceivingneoadjuvanttherapyforpancreaticcancer AT brianginnebaugh safetyandefficacyofselfexpandingmetalstentsforbiliarydrainageinpatientsreceivingneoadjuvanttherapyforpancreaticcancer AT abdulkhan safetyandefficacyofselfexpandingmetalstentsforbiliarydrainageinpatientsreceivingneoadjuvanttherapyforpancreaticcancer AT kulwindersdua safetyandefficacyofselfexpandingmetalstentsforbiliarydrainageinpatientsreceivingneoadjuvanttherapyforpancreaticcancer |
_version_ |
1724737383064141824 |